Mafiascum.net

Votecount 1.2

HoldenGolden(2)

~ ceejayvinoya(1), Tuxedo Mask(2)

Kilgamayan(1)

~ enomis(3)

Hoctac(1)

~ DkKoba(5)

DkKoba(1)

~ Kilgamayan(2)

clidd(1)

~ Night 3 Roses(5)


Not Voting (3): HoldenGolden(0), clidd(0), Hoctac(0)

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2020-05-29 05:21:12)

FLAVOR

imo what to do with someone that doesn't want to hammer depends on how they handle the situation. Someone that goes "no I'm townreading them and that's that" and shoves their fingers in their ears can be sent to the guillotine the next day because that reeks of scum wanting to avoid hammering a supersaint. I'd be substantially more willing to give leeway to someone that goes "I'm townreading this person for A B C reasons and I think the case against them doesn't fly for X Y Z reasons" and actually makes an effort to dissuade the lynch onto someone else they find scummier. (Assuming their argumentation isn't all bunk, of course.)

Dissuade, persuade, everything means the same thing, what are words anyway

it was pretty much the first scenario, yeah.
-D

Hello!

Hoctac, no reason, but this should be your new avatar.

The shitposting life is hard

i may or may not have bullied george into changing his avatar back.

sorry holden.

-D

In post 8, Night 3 Roses wrote:I see my Rose counterpart already voted.

Looking forward to this

-Ico

Rose's are red,
Violets are blue,
I cant rhyme,
And neither will you

VOTE: Night Three Rose's

Pedit: ah then you really shall die now

In post 32, Night 3 Roses wrote:i may or may not have bullied george into changing his avatar back.

sorry holden.

-D

How could you, coward. I loved that monstrosity.

How do I look?? Be honest.

Hardclaiming insane novice macho cop/doc watcher btw

In post 35, Hoctac wrote:How do I look?? Be honest.

Beautiful.

In post 36, HoldenGolden wrote:Hardclaiming insane novice macho cop/doc watcher btw

I CC, let's lynch this scum.

In post 18, Tuxedo Mask wrote:VOTE: Holden The donkey knows what they did.

#rude

I'm totally not watching you day 2

In post 37, Tuxedo Mask wrote:

In post 35, Hoctac wrote:How do I look?? Be honest.

Beautiful.

In post 36, HoldenGolden wrote:Hardclaiming insane novice macho cop/doc watcher btw

I CC, let's lynch this scum.

Haha that was a gambit son. You just got gambitted. That role doesnt even exist in this set up! Only a moron would claim it!

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Tuxedo Mask

In post 36, HoldenGolden wrote:Hardclaiming insane novice macho cop/doc watcher btw

In post 39, HoldenGolden wrote:Only a moron would claim it!

-D

I'm very confused. It seems we have a claim and a counterclaim already? I think that means one of them is lying and we should lynch one.

In post 26, Kilgamayan wrote:imo what to do with someone that doesn't want to hammer depends on how they handle the situation. Someone that goes "no I'm townreading them and that's that" and shoves their fingers in their ears can be sent to the guillotine the next day because that reeks of scum wanting to avoid hammering a supersaint. I'd be substantially more willing to give leeway to someone that goes "I'm townreading this person for A B C reasons and I think the case against them doesn't fly for X Y Z reasons" and actually makes an effort to dissuade the lynch onto someone else they find scummier. (Assuming their argumentation isn't all bunk, of course.)

Too much word salad 2/10
VOTE: kilga

In post 41, Hoctac wrote:I'm very confused. It seems we have a claim and a counterclaim already? I think that means one of them is lying and we should lynch one.

Vote the admitted liar, I, on the other hand, would never admit to something as incriminating as pretending to be a PR not in the setup.

I want you to vote Holden if that wasn't clear.

Okay!

VOTE: Holden

In post 40, Night 3 Roses wrote:

In post 36, HoldenGolden wrote:Hardclaiming insane novice macho cop/doc watcher btw

In post 39, HoldenGolden wrote:Only a moron would claim it!

-D

Let's break down this post.

On surface level, this post is apperently attempting to to point out the logical conclusion that I, HoldenGolden, am calling myself a Moron. However, this post gets much deeper by using Emjoi Analysis (EA), where the real scummy intentions come alive. We all know that such a contradiction coming from a townie PoV would use either the (if you are a filthy casual) or (If you want a comedic option). Coupled with a lack of any other analysis besides EA, this is certainly a scummy attempt at discrediting my intelligence.

You not only get my Finger, but my own Arm of Suspicion

In post 43, Tuxedo Mask wrote:

In post 41, Hoctac wrote:I'm very confused. It seems we have a claim and a counterclaim already? I think that means one of them is lying and we should lynch one.

Vote the admitted liar, I, on the other hand, would never admit to something as incriminating as pretending to be a PR not in the setup.

I want you to vote Holden if that wasn't clear.

Ah but by trying to defeat the evil you saw in my lying ways, you too lied to CC me. So which one of us is a real liar. The one who admitted to lying, or the one trying to cover up the lie he told?

Hoctac vote Tuxedo

In post 45, HoldenGolden wrote:

In post 40, Night 3 Roses wrote:

In post 36, HoldenGolden wrote:Hardclaiming insane novice macho cop/doc watcher btw

In post 39, HoldenGolden wrote:Only a moron would claim it!

-D

Let's break down this post.

On surface level, this post is apperently attempting to to point out the logical conclusion that I, HoldenGolden, am calling myself a Moron. However, this post gets much deeper by using Emjoi Analysis (EA), where the real scummy intentions come alive. We all know that such a contradiction coming from a townie PoV would use either the (if you are a filthy casual) or (If you want a comedic option). Coupled with a lack of any other analysis besides EA, this is certainly a scummy attempt at discrediting my intelligence.

You not only get my Finger, but my own Arm of Suspicion

-D

In post 47, HoldenGolden wrote:Hoctac vote Tuxedo

Compromise, we both vote Hoctac.

VOTE: Hoctac