Mafiascum.net

Yeah, quite different from what we're seeing of her right now

In post 23, notscience wrote:Nai because I’ve only played with them once if I’m remembering correctly and I don’t even remember the exact game let alone what hooplas alignment was

The style of posting is just something I think I would remember, you know? Like pirate mollie i automatically associate a certain text style with her and same for kkb, who both have weird posting styles

This is a really long winded way to say idk but I don’t think it has anything to do with alignment in this instance- maybe more excitement for this game?

I see, yeah that's fair, then i'm pretty sure that these posts make me lean towards thinking hoop is here to have a fun game, maybe take a little bit of time before getting serious

Does anyone with more experience know hooplas alignment preference?

Why not ask Hoopla?

Because that would be the smart thing to do and I clearly don’t have my thinking cap on today.

Hoopla what’s your alignment pref

I would guess that Hoopla's alignment preference isn't allowed in this game.

Hello again, Espeonage!

In post 25, Gypyx wrote:Yeah, quite different from what we're seeing of her right now

Who were you were responding to here?

Oh shit I just actually looked at this playerlist. This playerlist is stacked. Hi like 80% of this game who I know.

In post 32, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 25, Gypyx wrote:Yeah, quite different from what we're seeing of her right now

Who were you were responding to here?

I was responding to you here

In post 7, Espeonage wrote:It's fun to see Hoopa avoiding making a claim in post 1.

Claim Night 1 Vig

This is something that should be worked out as well.

Goddamn it, I was going to rvs vote espe for saying he wanted to play with me in the queue. Now I can't responsibly.

In post 7, Espeonage wrote:It's fun to see Hoopa avoiding making a claim in post 1.

Claim Night 1 Vig

This is something that should be worked out as well.

Yeah, I'm not sure it makes sense either, because it eliminates the possibility of scum counter claiming on d2. I guess we still get doctor wifom, but I his vig should come before the scum kill, so I don't think t makes sense for them to kill him, unless he has multiple shots. That would be very strange for a mini though. If there is only one kill on night 1 we lynch espe.

In post 9, notscience wrote:Ehhhhh

What’s up doc?

Huntin wabbits.

In post 12, Gypyx wrote:Isn't the N1 vig claim a meme claim? It doesn't really look serious to me tbh

VOTE: vote: Gypyx
Angling for claimed PR lynch.

In post 15, Hoopla wrote:a meme claim, you say?

i don't know how i feel about someone treating the early game with such disrespect.

Damn. I'm just going to hard sheep hoopla this game.

In post 21, Gypyx wrote:

In post 10, notscience wrote:Hoopla did you used to be tails

Idk why I keep thinking of tails when I read your name

Also I don’t think I remember you being quite this over the top verbose

also curious about why claim n1 vig instead of crumb it

So, what does Hoopla's "change" in behaviour means to you, is it towny / scummy / NAI?

Fucking post #21 meta discussion. obligatory "meta is bullshit" comment. This might be the earliest I have said that in a game....

Hi. On iPad for now, more meat post tonight after work. For now,


What the fuck has changed in the four years since I last played because lol this is not the first page and a half I expected.

Currently I have cooldog and notsci as potential scum for going in to night prep immediately. Seems like a scum thing to focus on right now no?

It's apparently not painfully obvious. I'm not a vig.

In post 35, CooLDoG wrote:

In post 7, Espeonage wrote:It's fun to see Hoopa avoiding making a claim in post 1.

Claim Night 1 Vig

This is something that should be worked out as well.

Goddamn it, I was going to rvs vote espe for saying he wanted to play with me in the queue. Now I can't responsibly.

In post 7, Espeonage wrote:It's fun to see Hoopa avoiding making a claim in post 1.

Claim Night 1 Vig

This is something that should be worked out as well.

Yeah, I'm not sure it makes sense either, because it eliminates the possibility of scum counter claiming on d2. I guess we still get doctor wifom, but I his vig should come before the scum kill, so I don't think t makes sense for them to kill him, unless he has multiple shots. That would be very strange for a mini though. If there is only one kill on night 1 we lynch espe.

In post 9, notscience wrote:Ehhhhh

What’s up doc?

Huntin wabbits.

In post 12, Gypyx wrote:Isn't the N1 vig claim a meme claim? It doesn't really look serious to me tbh

VOTE: vote: Gypyx
Angling for claimed PR lynch.

In post 15, Hoopla wrote:a meme claim, you say?

i don't know how i feel about someone treating the early game with such disrespect.

Damn. I'm just going to hard sheep hoopla this game.

In post 21, Gypyx wrote:

In post 10, notscience wrote:Hoopla did you used to be tails

Idk why I keep thinking of tails when I read your name

Also I don’t think I remember you being quite this over the top verbose

also curious about why claim n1 vig instead of crumb it

So, what does Hoopla's "change" in behaviour means to you, is it towny / scummy / NAI?

Fucking post #21 meta discussion. obligatory "meta is bullshit" comment. This might be the earliest I have said that in a game....

Post 12 : I get where your going, but the reason I questionned the claim was because i've read through a decent number of games, and the few page 1/2 claim i've seen so far were meme claims, plus this one too is quite ambiguous too

Post 21 : Meta isn't really bullshit, sure it's quite overrated, but it's still a decent tool, especially in the early stages of the game

In post 38, Espeonage wrote:It's apparently not painfully obvious. I'm not a vig.

I know you're not. I am... and so's Una... AND Hoopla.

And my mum.

Night prep?

In post 37, Espeonage wrote:Currently I have cooldog and notsci as potential scum for going in to night prep immediately. Seems like a scum thing to focus on right now no?

Vote: Cooldog

You do realize I am on EST time (in the best country in the world, America ) and the game started at 5 in the morning, right?

In post 38, Espeonage wrote:It's apparently not painfully obvious. I'm not a vig.

Why would you do this? What reaction tells did you get from your stunt?

@gyphx, meta is bullshit. I will not read meta arguments, nor will the hold any sway on my vote what so ever. Feel free to forward them, just know I will not give a shit.

i dont think i'll be RVSing today. maybe tomorrow

^so it wouldn't be an RVS then right? Or are you trying to wait to hop onto a wagon?

rvs doesn't mean posting, its a random vote & i will not be making one of those today

In post 35, CooLDoG wrote:

In post 12, Gypyx wrote:Isn't the N1 vig claim a meme claim? It doesn't really look serious to me tbh

VOTE: vote: Gypyx
Angling for claimed PR lynch.

CoolDog, could you explain how Gypx was angling to lynch a claimed PR here?

In post 36, AGar wrote:What the fuck has changed in the four years since I last played because lol this is not the first page and a half I expected.

What did you expect?

In post 43, Emperor flippyNips wrote:


i dont think i'll be RVSing today. maybe tomorrow

Flippy! Fantastic entrance as always.

In post 46, Emperor flippyNips wrote:VOTE: Gypyx

Why this vote?

In post 41, notscience wrote:Night prep?

I think that Espeonage meant "preparing next night's actions"

And flippy nips, if you aren't RVS'ing, why the naked vote?