Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 2:45 am
this was the 12th post afer mine VOTE: notscienceIn post 17, notscience wrote:In post 16, farside22 wrote:Town or scum im enjoying hk-50 commitment for posting style.
this was the 12th post afer mine VOTE: notscienceIn post 17, notscience wrote:In post 16, farside22 wrote:Town or scum im enjoying hk-50 commitment for posting style.
this was the 12th post after nine VOTE: notscienceIn post 21, notscience wrote:Why? I don't think it really is going to change how we read him.
I hope this wont be a thing. I get bitey after awhile if you dont form your own opinion.In post 17, notscience wrote:In post 16, farside22 wrote:Town or scum im enjoying hk-50 commitment for posting style.
Why is votato part of this sentence?In post 20, Dunnstral wrote:He's scum with votato, but I'll let him live for being amusingIn post 16, farside22 wrote:Town or scum im enjoying hk-50 commitment for posting style.
Sorry. Creating a charter or pretending to post a way that isn't real isnt AI. I just found it entertaining.In post 22, HK 50 wrote:[Irradiated Statement:]More shameless buddying? How can I enjoy executing my assassination protocols by wrapping my durasteel vicegrips around organic's boney necks when they offer no countermeasure? I've never seen such a species who end up praising a self-proclaimed harbinger of their doom over the forced expression of said harbinger's vocalizer.
[Wearily Resignation:]Farside and Notscience imitate the mindless pacifistic ideology of the idoitic jedi, and thus should be terminated with exterminated with extreme prejudice. Such passive behavioral tendencies and mindset tend to come from our targets, the organization known as the mafia, who prefer subtle influencing and lack the backbone to call out the rest of the ship early on.
[Confession:]They are also preventing the very conflict I wish to experience.
Did you learn your lesson from animal mafia or do you really think NS is scummy?In post 28, Dunnstral wrote:That's what you get for being passive on page 1
I vaguely saw his first post as a partner postIn post 29, farside22 wrote:Why is votato part of this sentence?
That's how the real world worksnotscience wrote:You can’t just tell me not to do something and then expect me not to do that thing
What lesson applies here?farside22 wrote:Did you learn your lesson from animal mafia or do you really think NS is scummy?In post 28, Dunnstral wrote:That's what you get for being passive on page 1
Being passive. I called you out day 1 for putting a player at l-1 while you said nothing until thenIn post 32, Dunnstral wrote:I vaguely saw his first post as a partner postIn post 29, farside22 wrote:Why is votato part of this sentence?
That's how the real world worksnotscience wrote:You can’t just tell me not to do something and then expect me not to do that thing
What lesson applies here?farside22 wrote:Did you learn your lesson from animal mafia or do you really think NS is scummy?In post 28, Dunnstral wrote:That's what you get for being passive on page 1
I picked up that game though. I post when I'm interestedIn post 33, farside22 wrote:Being passive. I called you out day 1 for putting a player at l-1 while you said nothing until then
Id call that pretty damn passive.
I thought you were saying you were trying to use your mmmmmm.......... performance to do a reaction test, so I was apologizing if I ruined your fun.In post 39, HK 50 wrote:[Statement:]Master Farside! I would advise you not to argue my existence is "made up". It accidently trips my Mark II Philosophy unit, making me ponder my programming. After all, I'm currently in a state of ethical bliss where I massacre all organics in the same, wanton style. Tempering which such a perfect wiring will only lead to decrease efficiency.
UNVOTE: notscience
VOTE: Farside
[Observation:]However master, I am rather perplexed by the tonal discharge displayed by you in post 29. Despite my strewed desires, you seem deadly serious in your apology when the thread's tone was akin to cheerful banter. Why did you felt the need to Apolgize for the lack of murdering?
[Addendum:]Assuming your dialogue with Dunnstral has reached its concordance with its primary directive, what did you hope to gain from asking him such a question? It seems you believe that Dunnstral demonstrated a logical gap in that another game he was pushed for being passive as town, yet pushes Notscience here for it. Is this correct? If so, what makes you believe the phrasing by Dunnstral in said evidence is not influenced by random voting stage behavior? As that would be the consequence of such a read.
Hey bob. How are you feeling this game so far?
In post 35, Malakittens wrote:Herrrrrrro everyone.
VOTE: ns
Also HK50 posting style is funny.
I kinda have to agree with Dunn that I saw Vot’s post regarding HK50 as a “why do they know so much about his posting style”
I don’t mind the odd fun gimmick. IDK i just read Vot’s as he has more information that others has, but I guess that more because I’m not a Star Wars fan and not something that’s AI. I’m letting it go for now, but just note that it’s something that’s on the back burner if one of them flips scum.In post 47, bob3141 wrote:In post 35, Malakittens wrote:Herrrrrrro everyone.
VOTE: ns
Also HK50 posting style is funny.
I kinda have to agree with Dunn that I saw Vot’s post regarding HK50 as a “why do they know so much about his posting style”
I have feeling who HK 50 might be.
Might be another player that likes the odd fun gimmick.