Mafiascum.net

sorry Galron... i dont understand what you asking.

Hi everyone
If there is a priest in the game, they would know who the sinner is.
I was thinking about this for a bit but as I'm corrupt and a corrupt role is a potential place for wolves to hide behind - I'm the sinner.
I would ask that the priest comes out so that if one of us dies during the night it can confirm the other/or clairvoyant checks the priest it's potentially confirmed I'm telling the truth?
Either way doesn't matter exactly because I would rather that I get burned than a confirmable non-corrupt villager gets burned so it's probably better to have this out in the open.



Galron: "Also posting our votes her in thread as well seems like a good idea." Well maybe good point. We can talk about our votes and post them, might be useful for general consensus so that the wolves don't end up being the only ones with agreement on votes and the other votes are scattered and thus the wolves get what they wanted. (although I guess that'd more happen on a ballot but still)

In post 18, Galron wrote:I wanna know how A50 scored a named role?

Come again?

In post 21, Galron wrote:Morning announcements must be via pm.

I'm sorry to report I am trying to decipher what you're saying into something comprehensible, but -so far- I failed miserably.

Waiting for Spicer and WLC to post
Priest should not claim until the sinner and or (seducer if claimed) are checked. The Inn keeper and (Bard if they exsist ) prob should claim either.

I am claiming NC Town aligned... if the cop invesigate me I should come up as NC ,if they get anything else I need to be executed

Also if the seducer exsist they needs to claim today if not any such claim should be consider as fake.

TheFuzzylogic99:
I'm a waste of the clairvoyant nightly check because if I'm telling the truth I will show as Corrupt AND if I'm lying I'll show as Corrupt. You're better off with clairvoyant checking a random other person and then potentially burning them or me tomorrow depending on what town finds.


If the bard/innkeeper are revealed it might be an easy way for wolves to stop information from spreading anonymously and thus force the clairvoyant into claiming and becoming a target so I would personally advise against them from claiming.

@Skies -I never claimed the clairvoyant should investigate you... I am not sure how you got that.
Reread the Roles, If there is a Priest in the game they need to claim today. There is no reason for them not to claim today imho

In post 29, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Waiting for Spicer and WLC to post
Priest should not claim until the sinner and or (seducer if claimed) are checked. The Inn keeper and (Bard if they exsist ) prob should claim either.

I am claiming NC Town aligned... if the cop invesigate me I should come up as NC ,if they get anything else I need to be executed

to be clear this should read inn keeper and bard should NOT claim either

In post 27, Almost50 wrote:

In post 18, Galron wrote:I wanna know how A50 scored a named role?

Come again?

In post 25, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:sorry Galron... i dont understand what you asking.

I've voted twice so far. How many times have you voted?

In post 28, Almost50 wrote:

In post 21, Galron wrote:Morning announcements must be via pm.

I'm sorry to report I am trying to decipher what you're saying into something comprehensible, but -so far- I failed miserably.

We can circle back to this after the thread develops a bit more.

In post 36, Galron wrote:

In post 25, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:sorry Galron... i dont understand what you asking.

I've voted twice so far. How many times have you voted?

what does that have to do with anything? I am confused

In post 38, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:

In post 36, Galron wrote:

In post 25, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:sorry Galron... i dont understand what you asking.

I've voted twice so far. How many times have you voted?

what does that have to do with anything? I am confused

I can tell you that I voted, but you don't know whether I did, how many times, or who for. My point is we can talk about our votes and even post them, and as brighteningskies pointed out, it may be a good idea to at least talk about them to aid in seeing what coalitions develop, wagons and all that. I think that has utility. But we need to be cautious because the votes out here -- like the polls before and after elections -- aren't the votes that count.

Btw, I haven't voted.

In post 39, Galron wrote:

In post 38, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:

In post 36, Galron wrote:

In post 25, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:sorry Galron... i dont understand what you asking.

I've voted twice so far. How many times have you voted?

what does that have to do with anything? I am confused

I can tell you that I voted, but you don't know whether I did, how many times, or who for. My point is we can talk about our votes and even post them, and as brighteningskies pointed out, it may be a good idea to at least talk about them to aid in seeing what coalitions develop, wagons and all that. I think that has utility. But we need to be cautious because the votes out here -- like the polls before and after elections -- aren't the votes that count.

Btw, I haven't voted.

uh why lie like this? whats the point?

In post 29, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:The Inn keeper and (Bard if they exsist ) prob should claim either.

Uhhh, they definitely should not.

Don’t know anything that’s going on right now, so I’m going to follow the player who I feel is the most pro village.

The jury is still out on that.

slow game we got here

You say that like it’s a bad thing.

I believe brighteningskies, and am inclined to think TFL99 would not be so bold or reckless as scum. A50 lean Town.

Disliking Taylor Swift and Galron, but gut says they’re not S/S. Suspicious of Italiano as well.

In post 29, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Waiting for Spicer and WLC to post
Priest should not claim until the sinner and or (seducer if claimed) are checked. The Inn keeper and (Bard if they exsist ) prob should claim either.

I am claiming NC Town aligned... if the cop invesigate me I should come up as NC ,if they get anything else I need to be executed

Why all the claims?? It serves no purpose to ask someone to claim unless you tell us the pros and cons.

For example, I don't see why the Inn Keeper should claim at all. We got the morning news through them. If they claim they die and we no longer get the announcement.

I also don't know why the Priest should claim. We have the Sinner claiming already. A Seducer may or may not exist. If not, then that's a sweet spot for a Wolf to fakeclaim and get caught lying. If there there is, then te Seducer themselves can CC.

But -as I said- I am not sure I am on top of everything yet. I probably need you to talk to me about how you're seeing things from a mechanical perspective to help polish my grasp.

Note: I am assuming NC = Non-Corrupt?

In post 42, ItalianoVD wrote:Don’t know anything that’s going on right now, so

I’m going to follow the player who I feel is the most pro village

.

The jury is still out on that.

This post means nothing unless you tell us who that is.

In post 32, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@Skies -I never claimed the clairvoyant should investigate you... I am not sure how you got that.
Reread the Roles, If there is a Priest in the game they need to claim today. There is no reason for them not to claim today imho

Well you said "Priest should not claim until the sinner and or (seducer if claimed) are checked" and I don't know what else you mean other than clairvoyant check by "checked" so that's where I got that from lol

If the clairvoyant can check a claimed priest and we get news that they're non corrupt/no news it's more likely I'm not lying so there's fewer places for wolves to hide. But to be fair priest could be defector and thus non corrupt so that's not even foolproof and I understand either way claiming or not claiming. You could argue either way ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

In post 44, Pine wrote:and am inclined to think TFL99 would not be so bold or reckless as scum

Is this a general read or accustomed to what you know of TFL?

Regardless of what the answer is, what posts did you perceive as "bold" or reckless for page 1?