Page 2 of 183

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:25 am
by petapan
VOTE: hoopla

obviously the team is hoopla/penguingpower/thegoldenparadox, gg

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:31 am
by DrippingGoofball
VOTE: Uncrowned

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:36 am
by Hoopla
In post 23, Uncrowned wrote:Go on?
looks to me like a sneaky opening line cooked up behind the scenes.

the intention of course being to feign surprise & assert innocence.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:37 am
by JacksonVirgo
In post 23, Uncrowned wrote:
In post 22, Hoopla wrote:
In post 20, skitter30 wrote:Also i'm intrigued that scum picked informed, i prob would have picked multitasking
you're lucky you voted correctly, otherwise i would be all over this.
Go on?
I think this is saying that saying "I did would have done X but scum did Y so I can't be scum" kind of self-defense which is generally really scummy in some circumstances

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:46 am
by skitter30
Nah, just making an observation that's meant to spark conversation (like it did!).

And I've been scum in x|y setups twice and multitasking is vastly more useful imo, you can get a p decent sense of the spread of roles just from knowing where scum sits in the draft + like two flips/claims

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:47 am
by skitter30
Also obligatory max one scum in each of the sets of 4's and 5's, imo

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:49 am
by petapan
In post 30, skitter30 wrote:Also obligatory max one scum in each of the sets of 4's and 5's, imo
no that is hooplas trick

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:51 am
by Hoopla
In post 29, skitter30 wrote:Nah, just making an observation that's meant to spark conversation (like it did!).

And I've been scum in x|y setups twice and multitasking is vastly more useful imo, you can get a p decent sense of the spread of roles just from knowing where scum sits in the draft + like two flips/claims
doubling down, i see.

did you get outvoted in the scum PT?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:55 am
by Uncrowned
In post 27, Hoopla wrote:
In post 23, Uncrowned wrote:Go on?
looks to me like a sneaky opening line cooked up behind the scenes.

the intention of course being to feign surprise & assert innocence.
In post 28, JacksonVirgo wrote:
In post 23, Uncrowned wrote:
In post 22, Hoopla wrote:
In post 20, skitter30 wrote:Also i'm intrigued that scum picked informed, i prob would have picked multitasking
you're lucky you voted correctly, otherwise i would be all over this.
Go on?
I think this is saying that saying "I did would have done X but scum did Y so I can't be scum" kind of self-defense which is generally really scummy in some circumstances
I guess? I see the point being made, but that could easily come from either alignment.

If anything, I like skitter more for making a post like that in a circumstance where it could draw unnecessary attention at this stage of the game.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:56 am
by Hoopla
In post 31, petapan wrote:no that is hooplas trick
i say we slice & dice the singletons.

seeing such a large amount of medium & high numbers looks like a deliberate scum strategy to land unique numbers. a high number selection usually guarantees a pick in the top half of the draft.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:58 am
by skitter30
In post 31, petapan wrote:
In post 30, skitter30 wrote:Also obligatory max one scum in each of the sets of 4's and 5's, imo
no that is hooplas trick
you mean she normally makes that observation or that scum!her would deliberately double up?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:58 am
by Uncrowned
In post 26, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: Uncrowned
I unironically like this vote.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:59 am
by skitter30
In post 32, Hoopla wrote:doubling down, i see.

did you get outvoted in the scum PT?
i mean, if i did, i kinda doubt i'd be airing scum dirty's laundry here, or that i'd choose to make a point of it
and if i were scum ... there's a p decent chance i just talk everyone into agreeing to multitasking, depending on who exactly comprises the scumteam

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:01 am
by Uncrowned
In post 28, JacksonVirgo wrote:
In post 23, Uncrowned wrote:
In post 22, Hoopla wrote:
In post 20, skitter30 wrote:Also i'm intrigued that scum picked informed, i prob would have picked multitasking
you're lucky you voted correctly, otherwise i would be all over this.
Go on?
I think this is saying that saying "I did would have done X but scum did Y so I can't be scum" kind of self-defense which is generally really scummy in some circumstances
Follow up on this actually: So do you agree with Hoopla's premise or are you just giving your interpretation of what it meant?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:04 am
by skitter30
Also early townpings on uncrowned

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:05 am
by Hoopla
In post 37, skitter30 wrote:i mean, if i did, i kinda doubt i'd be airing scum dirty's laundry here, or that i'd choose to make a point of it
mmm fair point.

it would probably take a moment of brilliance to conceive of such a cunning plan.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:07 am
by Uncrowned
In post 34, Hoopla wrote:
In post 31, petapan wrote:no that is hooplas trick
i say we slice & dice the singletons.

seeing such a large amount of medium & high numbers looks like a deliberate scum strategy to land unique numbers. a high number selection usually guarantees a pick in the top half of the draft.
With this thought process in mind, how many scum do you think there is between myself (14) Infinity (23) and Petapan (100000)?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:15 am
by petapan
In post 35, skitter30 wrote:
In post 31, petapan wrote:
In post 30, skitter30 wrote:Also obligatory max one scum in each of the sets of 4's and 5's, imo
no that is hooplas trick
you mean she normally makes that observation or that scum!her would deliberately double up?
yes she had all her team pick 4. very clever but unfortunately i have seen through it

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:19 am
by Uncrowned
Explain why you've left JV off the scumteam, since they also picked for. Did their P1 posting factor in at all?

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:20 am
by petapan
he is simply too hyper to be scum

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:20 am
by petapan
*they, fuck, sorry, bad reflex

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:22 am
by Uncrowned
Even though it's mostly meme content that often goes unnoticed anyway?

I don't think it's particularly alignment indicative

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:24 am
by petapan
dont harsh my buzz

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:59 am
by Hoopla
In post 41, Uncrowned wrote:With this thought process in mind, how many scum do you think there is between myself (14) Infinity (23) and Petapan (100000)?
i want to say peta's bid of a million is another brazen, highly suspicious scum move cooked up in the PT...

...but she's already pointed the finger at me, and we all know it's improper etiquette to accuse your accuser.

Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:59 am
by PenguinPower
Image