Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:25 am
VOTE: hoopla
obviously the team is hoopla/penguingpower/thegoldenparadox, gg
obviously the team is hoopla/penguingpower/thegoldenparadox, gg
looks to me like a sneaky opening line cooked up behind the scenes.In post 23, Uncrowned wrote:Go on?
I think this is saying that saying "I did would have done X but scum did Y so I can't be scum" kind of self-defense which is generally really scummy in some circumstancesIn post 23, Uncrowned wrote:Go on?In post 22, Hoopla wrote:you're lucky you voted correctly, otherwise i would be all over this.In post 20, skitter30 wrote:Also i'm intrigued that scum picked informed, i prob would have picked multitasking
no that is hooplas trickIn post 30, skitter30 wrote:Also obligatory max one scum in each of the sets of 4's and 5's, imo
doubling down, i see.In post 29, skitter30 wrote:Nah, just making an observation that's meant to spark conversation (like it did!).
And I've been scum in x|y setups twice and multitasking is vastly more useful imo, you can get a p decent sense of the spread of roles just from knowing where scum sits in the draft + like two flips/claims
In post 27, Hoopla wrote:looks to me like a sneaky opening line cooked up behind the scenes.In post 23, Uncrowned wrote:Go on?
the intention of course being to feign surprise & assert innocence.
I guess? I see the point being made, but that could easily come from either alignment.In post 28, JacksonVirgo wrote:I think this is saying that saying "I did would have done X but scum did Y so I can't be scum" kind of self-defense which is generally really scummy in some circumstancesIn post 23, Uncrowned wrote:Go on?In post 22, Hoopla wrote:you're lucky you voted correctly, otherwise i would be all over this.In post 20, skitter30 wrote:Also i'm intrigued that scum picked informed, i prob would have picked multitasking
i say we slice & dice the singletons.In post 31, petapan wrote:no that is hooplas trick
you mean she normally makes that observation or that scum!her would deliberately double up?In post 31, petapan wrote:no that is hooplas trickIn post 30, skitter30 wrote:Also obligatory max one scum in each of the sets of 4's and 5's, imo
I unironically like this vote.
i mean, if i did, i kinda doubt i'd be airing scum dirty's laundry here, or that i'd choose to make a point of it
Follow up on this actually: So do you agree with Hoopla's premise or are you just giving your interpretation of what it meant?In post 28, JacksonVirgo wrote:I think this is saying that saying "I did would have done X but scum did Y so I can't be scum" kind of self-defense which is generally really scummy in some circumstancesIn post 23, Uncrowned wrote:Go on?In post 22, Hoopla wrote:you're lucky you voted correctly, otherwise i would be all over this.In post 20, skitter30 wrote:Also i'm intrigued that scum picked informed, i prob would have picked multitasking
mmm fair point.In post 37, skitter30 wrote:i mean, if i did, i kinda doubt i'd be airing scum dirty's laundry here, or that i'd choose to make a point of it
With this thought process in mind, how many scum do you think there is between myself (14) Infinity (23) and Petapan (100000)?In post 34, Hoopla wrote:i say we slice & dice the singletons.In post 31, petapan wrote:no that is hooplas trick
seeing such a large amount of medium & high numbers looks like a deliberate scum strategy to land unique numbers. a high number selection usually guarantees a pick in the top half of the draft.
yes she had all her team pick 4. very clever but unfortunately i have seen through itIn post 35, skitter30 wrote:you mean she normally makes that observation or that scum!her would deliberately double up?In post 31, petapan wrote:no that is hooplas trickIn post 30, skitter30 wrote:Also obligatory max one scum in each of the sets of 4's and 5's, imo
i want to say peta's bid of a million is another brazen, highly suspicious scum move cooked up in the PT...In post 41, Uncrowned wrote:With this thought process in mind, how many scum do you think there is between myself (14) Infinity (23) and Petapan (100000)?