Mafiascum.net

for reference on why nolimming day one is bad

9
no lim + nightkill
8
elim + nightkill
6
no elim (because it's miselim and lose) + nightkill
5


9
elim + nightkill
7
elim + nightkill
5

In post 21, Thynhith wrote:

In post 9, Greeting wrote:Greetings!

I don’t like Aristotle and I guess this extends to wannabes/imposters. VOTE: pseudoAristotle

What's your beef with him?

I don’t like Ancient Greek philosophers. I know literally nothing about the player.

In post 24, MafMen wrote: understandable
if im gonna wave my SE hat around generally you never want to eliminate someone at random, sure day 1 it’s statistically better than a nolim but youd want to get some reasoning behind that first
and 9 days is a lot longer than it seems lol

Noted!

In post 26, Greeting wrote:

In post 21, Thynhith wrote:

In post 9, Greeting wrote:Greetings!

I don’t like Aristotle and I guess this extends to wannabes/imposters. VOTE: pseudoAristotle

What's your beef with him?

I don’t like Ancient Greek philosophers. I know literally nothing about the player.

say what you want about phiolosphers but dont diss my man diogenes

we have 2 scums, right?

In post 29, igorsprite wrote:we have 2 scums, right?

We do.

In post 30, pseudoAristotle wrote:

In post 29, igorsprite wrote:we have 2 scums, right?

We do.

and do you know who they are?

If I did I wouldn't say :p

One other small advice for pseudoAristotle: it's generally a good idea to put votes on separate lines (i.e. not in the middle of a sentence like in 17). This is just a quality of life thing for mods, since votes in the middle of lines are easy to miss.

And yeah, echoing MafMen: we don't really eliminate "at random". One day is plenty of time to get reads on people. I don't really have any material reads yet but I've had plenty of games where I have some real reads at this point.

Hmmm!! Game gets spicy from the start, I see. Mark me present on the attendance sheet now! All here.

:P Of everything so far, I guess I'm most interested in that little back and forth about prev games! Voting for each other, are we, Margot and Thynhith?

In post 32, pseudoAristotle wrote:If I did I wouldn't say :p

good to know

VOTE: pseudoAristotle

In post 33, implosion wrote:One other small advice for pseudoAristotle: it's generally a good idea to put votes on separate lines (i.e. not in the middle of a sentence like in 17). This is just a quality of life thing for mods, since votes in the middle of lines are easy to miss.

And yeah, echoing MafMen: we don't really eliminate "at random". One day is plenty of time to get reads on people. I don't really have any material reads yet but I've had plenty of games where I have some real reads at this point.

good point
ive hosted a few games off site and it was absolute hell to sort through unfairly positioned votes
a simple thing i learned is to use f3 but sometimes even that doesnt save you

In post 35, frogsfrogs wrote: Of everything so far, I guess I'm most interested in that little back and forth about prev games! Voting for each other, are we, Margot and Thynhith?

What about it makes it the most interesting thing so far to you?

In post 15, MafMen wrote:ie. “lets lim catboi for being a weeb”

Big words for a puck avatar (๑و•̀ω•́)و

That being said, your posting so far is pinging my ~gut~, so take this!

VOTE: MafMen

i would hope puck would support my tirade against weebs
hes the goat for a reason

I have two smallish townreads for very silly reasons, a fast start for me in a newbie game.

In post 38, implosion wrote:

In post 35, frogsfrogs wrote::P Of everything so far, I guess I'm most interested in that little back and forth about prev games! Voting for each other, are we, Margot and Thynhith?

What about it makes it the most interesting thing so far to you?

I guess the conflict just stood out to me! Of course it's lighthearted ribbing and I don't think asking for more detail about what happened would be at all productive, but Margo had something pointed to say immediately and then Thynhith's reciprocal vote was the first to be less random, slightly more motivated, as defense of himself and/or a judgement on another player. :) Otherwise, we've been talking about game theory and advice for first timers (like I am, too). Just noting the interaction down, I think! They don't to be on the same side in a maf/maf way to me, that's something I can get from it.

There seem to be two absolutely new peeps in this game, so things should be interesting.
I'd to say I can read Margot reliably after my last game with her, but time will tell.

In post 22, pseudoAristotle wrote:

In post 19, MafMen wrote:

In post 17, pseudoAristotle wrote:hey folks. glad I didn't miss too much during the night. I'm going to

VOTE FrogsFrogs

because I think we should kick someone out night one and FrogsFrogs a) is already 1 vote closer to being hammered and b) hasn't said anything yet.

Also want to note that I did a tarot reading for this game last morning as a little bit of fun, I'm not sure if it's proper etiquette to dump a huge wall of text on day one, but here's a link to it. https://pastebin.com/LWGiTnt2. Omens look fairly good for this game, got a couple cards indicating a town victory.

a bit early for a lim dont you think?

Possibly. I was of the understanding that the meta is to vote someone out on the first day essentially at random, and then look at how people behaved during that vote for tells. I don't want to knock Frogs out *right* now before we've had the chance to see how people react to that, but fortunately there's a long way to go before five votes. I feel odd just voting for joke reasons-this game has to move forward somehow after all.

If you can think of some alternative to advance the game, I'd love to hear it. RQS is also a thing.
Well since you want us to lim someone at random, would you mind us limming you? I'll even get the wagon started ;P
VOTE: pseudoAristotle

VOTE: Greetings

My new choice of vanity vote. I mildly like frogsfrogs's response to me as townish.

Don't have particularly strong feelings on Aristotle. I certainly don't think they're particularly more likely than average to be scum right now.

whoops. Greeting singular.

In post 31, igorsprite wrote:

In post 30, pseudoAristotle wrote:

In post 29, igorsprite wrote:we have 2 scums, right?

We do.

and do you know who they are?

In post 32, pseudoAristotle wrote:If I did I wouldn't say :p

Why?

igorsprite and pseudo interaction looks weird but i think its green for both sides
greeting seems probtown, i like their presence