Activity seems to have picked up a bit. The mod team is still discussing what is to be done about activity as a whole. It is likely that we will seek replacements during a long night and issue a new and more relaxed post restriction. If you guys want to help us recruit players to get the replacement situation fixed more quickly, that would be just ducky.
@Good Host Lovecraft- Blessed art thou loins if you present an updated vote log.
1 Bradley's revelation of where each author stands with her garners much appreciation.
2 Appreciation of the Lord will result in HIS blessing.
3 A counterwagon of Ellis will be looked upon with scrutiny by MY CHOSEN people.
~Revelations 9:1
You have numbered points while I have numbered responses to those numbered specific points.
1] And yet and yet you still vote her (not that I argue with a vote on the Zimmer; I am just simply merely pointing out your self-inconsistency).
2] No response necessary (take this as you will).
3] Difficult to infer your true meaning here; my interpretation is that you would disapprove of any vote other than Ellis. Yet you're voting ZimmerBrad (see point 1).
The day of play in the way seems to be winding down and while Ellis seems to be the favored majority vote, I still think ZimmerBrad is the proper correct perfect choice and yet I see that there shall not be a solid wagon upon her this day.
Still, The Most Esteemed Lord God should be looked upon in regard to his conflict between words and thoughts and actions.
Kindly submit to clams. Or calm. Or claim. Yes, claim now.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:49 am
by Lemony Snicket
I apologize for my absence, but a robust woman named Sandy came to my doorstep and blew down my power lines. She had some nerve.
I will read the posts that transpired and hopefully have something to say then. Apparently we are nearing a consensus on Ellis? Allow me to research and I will consider changing my vote.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:56 am
by Lemony Snicket
Author Joyce is correct - Ellis should "claim," as they say, before we decide to exile him from our gathering. However, since it takes thirteen of us to come to a consensus, not twelve, I see no harm in placing my vote now.
UNVOTE: VOTE: Ellis
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:06 pm
by Dr Seuss
Vote: Bret Easton Ellis
He's a good guy; clearly it's so.
But it's time for someone to go.
Lurk for a month and throw down a hammer.
Shock! Awe! Lock Seuss up in the slammer!
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 5:42 pm
by HP Lovecraft
Bret Easton Ellis,
Vanilla Townie
, was lynched day 1. Night starts now. Night actions are due by 11/12 at 1PM EST. We will be sending a PM detailing the changes to the post restriction.
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:23 am
by HP Lovecraft
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:32 pm
by HP Lovecraft
ooc: Alright folks, here's how it's going to be. We have obviously had a pretty serious activity problem with this game. The mod team has talked it over, and I've given it a lot of thought. While you still need to post with your alts, you're free to post OOC in every post you make. I'm not going to prescribe a specific way of going about the implementation of OOC posting, I just want you to find a way to post more frequently than we have been to this point. As I've said before, I have been very impressed with how well you are all writing in your author voices, and that being the theme of this game, I certainly don't want that to stop. However, the need for actual words to get on the page in support of some kind of mafia game is more important than my desire to read pretty words and phrases. The game is going to go live tomorrow. I hope you've had enough time to recoup and resolve yourselves to participating a bit more diligently.
We're going to have at least one replacement coming into the game tomorrow, and I'm searching for one or two more. If you want to refer anyone to me who you think would be interested in playing, please let me know.
tl;dr you can post more OOC. lol replacements.
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:36 am
by HP Lovecraft
David Foster Wallace, vanilla town, killed night 1
The Daily Bugle, vanilla town, killed night 1
With 21 alive, it's 11 to lynch. Deadline is 12/17 1PM EST
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 8:09 am
by OscarWilde
"Good morning to all. I see that we have a new guest. And we have lost some of our number this night. It is curious though, the number and the names. Somebody has targeted an out of print newspaper for destruction. I do have my pet theories, but I'd like to refrain from making assumptions until more have weighed in, or it becomes exceptionally pertinent."
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:31 am
by Thomas Pynchon
Shakespeare, evil minded Shakespeare, inferred right for once. Williamson showed up looking like any traditional townie, looking for votes on a wagon he cared about. Five minutes later, he's on Wallace's ass for trying to get Poe lynched, doing the same thing.
Vote: Shakespeare
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:53 am
by Jane Austen
Can people argue over whether Seuss is here; that he is hiding, and waiting? The so honorable Poe is still definitely scum, though I'm not voting him, because my suspicions of Seuss have been vindicated; I feel they have been at least.
Vote: Seuss
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:54 pm
by Lemony Snicket
I have a few things I need to look into, since my thoughts on who the criminals are have not been accurate thus far. One of these things is the author Edgar. As of now I still believe he is one of the criminals, however there is a certain post which does not seem like the post a criminal would make, due to its length (some would say it is as long as a snake that is kept by a trio of orphan's estranged late uncle). When I find the time and I am not being chased by a traveling circus troupe, I will examine the logic and breadth of material of that post more in depth, along with the rest of the things he has said at this gathering.
While I dislike Seuss ending the day abruptly (especially immediately after I said he should claim), the lack of content makes me pause at considering the vote. Jane, I realize we've had a variation of this dialogue before, but why do you feel so strongly about Seuss being a criminal when he has said so little to judge upon?
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 9:24 pm
by Marion Zimmer Bradley
I would like to know the answer to that myself Jane?
I am feeling kind of blue at us losing dear David Foster Wallace. I really liked him. But we must move on and find the dastardly Terrans who committed such atrocities as killing him. I guess I will go back to my Keeper for more lessons too. And will then reassess my list of villains once more.... Back soon my fellow Commyn and Commynara.
Also a gracious thank you to our esteemed Hastur of Hasturs for hosting this party so well. Z'parvdu
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:06 am
by Fred Phelps
Y'know, I look at this game, and all I see is one generation after another of queers and queer-enablers. Dr. Seuss? The guy's a pedophile, bent on creating a nation of poetry-spouting sissyboys who mince around in footy pajamas. You're going to hell, Seuss, along with Things 1 and 2. Lord God? How dare you take upon the name of the One True Lord and use that to spread the queer agenda? You couldn't even fathom the punishment that God has for you. I haven't even seen one post from you decrying the homosexualization of America. You are a false prophet, and you too will one day eat your children in the fiery pits of blackest hell. Oscar Wilde? Man, don't even start me on the stuff THAT guy's into. He makes RuPaul look like the Apostle Paul.
But all that is irrelevant, because I've decided to bring judgement on the murderers among us, before letting God Himself judge the rampant collection of nancy sodomites that has assembled here.
Seuss, you called Brett Ellis a "good guy" shortly before contributing to his murder:
He's a good guy; clearly it's so.
But it's time for someone to go.
Lurk for a month and throw down a hammer.
Shock! Awe! Lock Seuss up in the slammer!
If you were anything other than a hell-bound, child-sodomizing lunatic bent on spitting upon the very Bible itself... why would you contribute to his death while calling him a good guy? While it's obvious that Ellis is in hell, there are people here that wish to do us harm. More specifically, they wish to do me--- God's One True Voice--- harm. You need to answer me, Seuss, or soon you'll kneel before your true master, bound eternally in hell.
God bless lynch mobs!
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:29 am
by James Joyce
Bread Phelps! The game just goat butter! I agree with defined dings or my fail low authors.
VOTE: Seuss
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:21 pm
by Jane Austen
↑Lemony Snicket wrote:I realize we've had a variation of this dialogue before, but why do you feel so strongly about Seuss being a criminal when he has said so little to judge upon?
Everything he has said is completely scum; he's had the same number of scummy posts as they the typical scum, but is missing the null posts that normally accompany them. He is still scum because his posts come from opportunism rather than scumhunting, and his lack of posts should not let him be forgiven from it.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:53 pm
by HP Lovecraft
Fred Phelps replaces Brian Jacques
Confucius replaces Moliere
Spinning Paper replaces Tommy Wiseau
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:08 pm
by Spinning Paper
The Room flops - 5 dead.
Vote: Shakespeare
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:44 pm
by Edgar Allan Poe
Is it a dream within a dream? All that we see or seem? And yet he, he still writes on – the Author of the Chronicles. Or can it be more, more? Members of this assembly are still of a mindset akin to a partisan.
A different day; a similar task
he thought.
Poe looked around him to the faces of the others – fewer than the day before. He saw Austen still murmuring the same nonsensical blabbering. He still saw Snicket giving him the evil eye.
But not all hope was withered with grief! Oh how it made him smile! Here was new blood, fresher than the dead parasites of the flu. Newer people to help us catch the criminals, to replace dead slots. Maybe now he would finally get a read on slots he thought long deceased.
“Interesting,” he murmured to himself.
“Well then, I hope you have had time to lax around in comfort provided by the Monsieur. Ultimately, though, you do know why all of you have been summoned? We’re here in a rather awkward state – rather chaotic. Kind are the souls who would please share their thoughts on all the manner, nay?” Slowly he looked at the friar and smiled, a rather sarcastic smile.
And then he looked around, and something caught his eye on the table. A newspaper. Another one.
He couldn't stop laughing.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:32 pm
by HP Lovecraft
ooc: All flavor has been updated. We are hopefully full up on replacements, although we might see one or two more before we are done removing the deadwood. May Yog-Sothoth bless our efforts!
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:58 pm
by Confucius
A superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions.
Players need to talk less and say more. Lurkers need to post.
~
Dr. Seuss, why did you describe your month-long absence as "lurking"? Would you agree you had one of the easier post-restrictions in the game? Why was Bret Easton Ellis "clearly" a good guy at the end of Day One?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:38 am
by James Joyce
↑Thomas Pynchon wrote:Williamson showed up looking like any traditional townie, looking for votes on a wagon he cared about.