Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:24 pm
Translation: I think I'll act as if my vote was always just a random vote - despite the fact that I was tunneling like crazy on ² - because I got called out on something I can't refute.
- b
- b
Page 11 of 31
- b
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:26 pm
I havn't noticed anything in particular, so lean town I suppose.In post 232, goodmorning wrote:Question for everyone: What is your read on Mr E?
- b
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:27 pm
We're town, isn't that right f?In post 234, RedCoyote wrote:² is working overtime to let us know he's town. I don't need him to tell me he's town. I don't need one head agreeing with the other head. That's just noise. That's cluttering the thread with junk.
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:28 pm
It means that leave should be replaced with lead.In post 234, RedCoyote wrote:I don't know what this means. What leave? What should be lead? Should I only listen to -f and not -b?
- b
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:29 pm
I disagree with this premise as well.In post 234, RedCoyote wrote:Why are you making 9 posts in a row? Posts like 178 and 179 are absolute garbage posts that only exist to needlessly inflate your post count and reduce the overall readability of the thread.
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:30 pm
Maybe I'm posting both quality and quantity.In post 234, RedCoyote wrote:Maybe you posting 10 times more than every other player fools tne and goodmorning, but it sure as hell doesn't fool me. Quality > quantity.
- b
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:31 pm
I'm sorry that I didn't get around to responding to it sooner.In post 237, A_Stone wrote:Btw, 2, the Spoilered part of my post was addressed to you
- b
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:33 pm
Oh, well, it still failed.In post 245, goodmorning wrote:When I said it was serious, that was a reaction test.
- b
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:35 pm
I am quite convinced about A_Stone being scum - even more than I was before.
- b
- b
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:38 pm
This is what A_Stone now claims is merely "interesting" and not something he ever thought was a "scum-tell". I think it's clearly between the lines - especially given that this is only the last part of a longer case on us - that he tries to pass this off as a scum-tell.
- b
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:43 pm
That was my point.
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 1:45 pm
Deadline is in
(expired on 2013-05-14 21:34:45)
thenewearth is temporarily V/LA.
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 3:24 pm
Ordinarily I would say yes but I'm really worried about agreeing with you and cluttering up the thread.In post 252, ² wrote:We're town, isn't that right f?In post 234, RedCoyote wrote:² is working overtime to let us know he's town. I don't need him to tell me he's town. I don't need one head agreeing with the other head. That's just noise. That's cluttering the thread with junk.
- f
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:05 pm
Answers to stuffs
|
|
|
So many posts in a row by 2 :/
I understand concise posting, but wut.
Hopefully ETL and Rach will post moar stuffs,
|
|
|
Spoiler:
So many posts in a row by 2 :/
I understand concise posting, but wut.
Hopefully ETL and Rach will post moar stuffs,
I'll look into it a bit more then.In post 241, goodmorning wrote:@Stone: Not off the top of my head.
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:27 pm
Yes you do, but you have to pretend not to at this point to backpedal out of this. It's not going to work.In post 263, A_Stone wrote:I still want to know why you had to ask, you said it wasn't obvious to you it was a player, and yet the post beforehand said he was giving him scumvibes? I don't see *how* the acronym wasn't apparent, everyone else understood it.
- b
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:28 pm
Yes, the initial vote. Then you started tunneling. Then I asked you if it was random, which you didn't answer. Then, when you ran into some trouble, you unvoted me, asserting that the vote had always been random.In post 263, A_Stone wrote:You're overthinking this way too much, my vote on you *was* random.
- b
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 1:00 am
@A_Stone assuming your vote on 2 was random all that time why did you feel it necessary to Unvote at that specific time? You say it’s because we left RVS but without placing a new vote it doesn’t look like
It seems to me you took your vote off of 2 hoping to stop the back and fourth with him.
It also looks like you are trying to redirect attention away from yourself by asking for more content from some of the more lurkerish players.
you
left RVS.It seems to me you took your vote off of 2 hoping to stop the back and fourth with him.
It also looks like you are trying to redirect attention away from yourself by asking for more content from some of the more lurkerish players.
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 2:47 am
I am really getting a bad vibe on A stone dude... uggh
VOTE: A Stone
VOTE: A Stone
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 2:49 am
Syndrome, atm I am leaning town on Squared... that may change when I get a chance to really look at the ISOs, but from what I have seen they seem to be ok, as for the heavy level of posting, both heads are really hyperactive types who post a shitaki amount, so yeah not good enough for a case on them...
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 4:06 am
IIRC, the theory behind it is that Townies tend to be paranoid, which tenses them up.In post 263, A_Stone wrote:I'll look into it a bit more then.In post 241, goodmorning wrote:@Stone: Not off the top of my head.
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 6:19 am
UNVOTE: A Stone
VOTE: RachMarie
serious vote. explain later
VOTE: RachMarie
serious vote. explain later
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 10:58 am
wow.. 80 posts since I last was here.. I have some catching up to do (right now) and will post my thoughts and responses.
(And my apologies for the lack of activity, I've been busy and caught up in other things for a couple days; I am normally much more active and will be now that school is done.)
(And my apologies for the lack of activity, I've been busy and caught up in other things for a couple days; I am normally much more active and will be now that school is done.)
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 11:11 am
My feeling on SoaT was more of a gutfeel. I'm not sure about him. Same with 2, but there are more pings there than with SoaT.In post 198, Mr E Roll wrote:This post made me think that you were reading 2 and Soat as scum.In post 144, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I'm mostly caught up. This post is troubling. Why did 2 feel the need to point out that their playstyle was "pro-town".In post 104, ² wrote:I think that having the second head confirming is pro-town. By not doing it we could,i if we were scum, pretend that the second head got a different perspective on something and backpeddal out of an unfortunate situation/read.
- b
Then, followed by this to SoaT, who was already giving me scumvibes:In post 123, ² wrote:I think I've made it pretty clear already what I want you to do, and I don't buy that you've somehow missed it.
- b
I didn't vote because I didn't feel my suspicion had been verified yet.How come you didn’t vote for either of them?
I'm not uncomfortable with it because the arguments against Stone (at the time of your post here) made sense and gave me a stronger feeling on him than on 2 or SoaT. However, I didn't really think about that until you pointed it out, and until I see other evidence against any of these three, I'll need to think about it more.I’m also a little puzzled that you are now talking about joining them on the Stone bandwagon. Aren’t you a little uncomfortable being on the same wagon as your two early scum reads? Did I misinterpret what you said in post 144? Or have your reads changed?
Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 11:47 am
A_Stone's 230 is really bugging me. The responses in the spoiler come off almost
too agreeable
. Scum will often try to appease the concerns of the town in order to seem more friendly, and think it makes them look less scummy. 230 feels very scummy to me.Posted: Thu May 02, 2013 11:51 am
I liked your points on him. From a quick look at his ISO, he seems intelligent, but smart doesn't always mean town. If you take the fact that he's logical out of the equation, his posts are rather null for me, but the way he went after TNE bothered me at the time because it was pretty clear to me what and why she was asking.In post 232, goodmorning wrote:Question for everyone: What is your read on Mr E?