I am currently searching for a replacement for Sonatine. If you have anyone in mind, feel free to have them send me a PM. <3
Carry on, campers.
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 11:50 am
by DoctorPepper
The sift coaching post.
Anyway, you explaining it, really doesnt explain why you'd use it against her to begin with
I took your page top, sorry ETL <3
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 11:53 am
by GuyInFreezer
Anyway I'm gonna explain why was going on with my head with the whole notepad thing.
1. I saw the language in Spanish.
2. I saw the title in Spanish (I honestly didn't see the mini part. I saw "bloc de notes" or whatever and translated as "blocks of notes" )
2a. Since you type in the title in the notepad and given 2, the user uses Spanish.
3. The content is in English.
4. Given 2a, 3 is unusual.
Q.E.D. The note was forged to be shown off.
But since 2 is wrong, the whole thing is taken apart.
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 11:54 am
by toxic-banana
Looks like we're heading towards a no lynch unless we can get something agreed. That said, we've got plenty of time no need to rush.
You two certainly make our lives more interesting
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 11:55 am
by GuyInFreezer
Er
"The whole thing falls apart" is what I'm looking for.
Also, I missed it <.<
(I rly need to take a break for a few hours)
P-Edit: wtf?
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 11:57 am
by Timeater
fascinating that doctor makes a babbling post with mostly inane irrelevant "me too" observations and with an apparent random vote on me at the end of it
fascinating indeed
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 11:58 am
by Timeater
(I rly need to take a break for a few hours)
your heart is in the right place. but this is true.
vote: doctor
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 11:58 am
by GuyInFreezer
GOD DAMMIT I MISREAD THE POST AGAIN
I'm really taking a break now
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 11:58 am
by toxic-banana
@Timeater has a point on the lack of logic. What's your reasoning on the vote @DoctorPepper? Like, I'm sure you have some reasons, you just didn't mention any in your vote post so I'd be interested to hear it.
I read that. And it blew.
How does that remotely resemble coaching?
P-Edit: HI TNE
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:17 pm
by RachMarie
Hey tne welcome
ya all scared a newbie away bad peeps Sending Saki and Sakura to bed without supper 11 pages already wtf
well we definitely are out of RVS so will take a good look at everyone and sort you all out...
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:19 pm
by DoctorPepper
Interesting, Timeeater completely ignores why I think he is scummy for that, and dismisses it as a random vote.
GiF how does it not? It literally says "why does your first post have to be a bad one"
Though this is hinging on whether sonatine's slot is scum. I think its scummy coaching.
Btw toxic, we are so not heading for a no lynch today. We have a 2 week deadline. Your insistent tone bothers me.
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:20 pm
by Timeater
sigh, all these cute anime girl avatars are going to bias me greatly
pedit: quote where i missed it
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:20 pm
by thenewearth
Hi peeps.
Obviously you need to give me some time to read though.
dont make this a twenty page game by the end of the day, try to be courteous to the other players not online. take it from me, i used to be you.
◕‿◕
pedit: sona pls why does your first post have to be a bad one are you scum pls no
Slowing the game down because this isn't some other site?
That's a terrible reason to ask us to slow down. We need information, content, INFO. The more, the better. We play at our own desired pace; we will not let you dictate our pace.
Vote: Timeater
Well if you guys stop spamming like that then we would.
Fluff post is cool and all but spamming is different. I would not mind it if it was just fluff.
And that's a terrible reason to vote timeater though.
-------------------------
Actual list coming up. Just a bit busy
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:21 pm
by GuyInFreezer
I took that as "your post is bad and you should feel bad" kind of thing, which is just null.
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:22 pm
by RachMarie
yeah chill there nana we gots plenty of time still... Now if we had like less than a day and were at this point, then I would be worried. But 2 weeks is plenty of time to have discussion and discussion is good for town.
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:24 pm
by DoctorPepper
Look at my post that is apparently "full of 'me toos'" and see the post I linked which related to you.
GiF its usually null but the fact that they know each other is the part that bugged me about the post.
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:25 pm
by GuyInFreezer
EM buddies.
I knew sonatine too
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:32 pm
by Timeater
oh one of your many quotes was directed at me, i clicked the bottom ones but not this one.
126 seriously feels like soft coaching. I saw in the OP that they know eachother but this is really pinging my scumdar.
Also why do you want things to slow down? If you meant the fluff, then yes. But the actual content is still there, we shouldnt slow that down.
yes, im coaching, but not in the way you think i am. i shouldn't have to explain why spamming up a thread is bad, or should i? basically the harder a game is to read the more likely people will to skim posts or simply not read posts because the amount of garbage is so high you just stop caring. it just creates a bad atmosphere.
also, bert was the person who talked about "slowing things down", not me. i simply asked that the machine-gun spam stop so players who haven't read the thread yet wont be discouraged when they have to. there is nothing more annoying as a player than coming home from work to find you have to sift through 20 pages to make one or two posts
pedit: i wish sona would have played instead of rqing
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:36 pm
by thenewearth
List:
Ok Let's start off now, shall we?
-----------------
Saki:
In post 132, Saki wrote:
Sakura why did you interrupt my reaction test
Why are you going for a GIF lynch this early
Why are you so opportunistic and aggressive
I didnt, you are the one who said I did, so I replied accordingly.
Because he's scum
I'd think being opportunistic would be to jump on someone with votes with silly reason, so what's your definition of oppportunistic? I'm always aggresive.
That's not a full answer to "why did you interrupt my reaction test on FSnake"
Are you 100% sure that he's scum?
Being opportunistic is pushing someone for a lynch early based on a scumtell that isnt really a scumtell
Excuses
Why are you excusing that... Let me be blunt here... Stupidity as "Reaction testing"? My god...
In post 92, Bert wrote:No, do you? His opening is rather null. I have a feeling his posts will ping my scumdar because of his somewhat sarcastic tone (eventually) lol
Saki, why don't you trust me?
He is null to me. Why did you sheep him?
Why should we trust you?
Because GIF has opened with scummy posts that kinda teasing tone...the teasing is like covering up his true intentions and I'm showing him some tough love <3
Also, I was going to vote GIF for the same reasons timeater mentioned, hence my "sheeping"
dont make this a twenty page game by the end of the day, try to be courteous to the other players not online. take it from me, i used to be you.
◕‿◕
pedit: sona pls why does your first post have to be a bad one are you scum pls no
Slowing the game down because this isn't some other site?
That's a terrible reason to ask us to slow down. We need information, content, INFO. The more, the better. We play at our own desired pace; we will not let you dictate our pace.
If you're scum, to mask your anti-town deficiencies and certain inner reactions that are scum-driven. What else did you think the answer to this would be?
You are so next after saki for this post.
---------------------
Everyone else is pretty null because of all this spam. I'll elaborate later in the day
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:38 pm
by DoctorPepper
Okay that makes sense. Which is why I agreed with you on the stop posting fluff thing.
Well it just bothered me as something experienced scum would say to newb scum partners. Thats why I thought it was fishy
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:41 pm
by thenewearth
Timeater is IC'ing, apparently.
It's pretty null and not a basis to vote him or not