Page 11 of 25

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:31 am
by RationalMadman
shos and angel r scum

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:37 am
by T S O
probably not/no

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:49 am
by RationalMadman
Here we have a scum sympathizer.

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:52 am
by T S O
lol k

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:58 am
by Malakittens
1.06
With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch


Voting:


*bazinga -
*T S O - JacobSavage [1]
*Desperado - ArcAngel9 [1]
*ArcAngel9 -
*penguin_alien -
*Squirrel Girl - bazinga, Squirrel Girl [2]
*shos - RationalMadman, Desperado [2]
*JacobSavage - T S O [1]
*RationalMadman - penguin_alien, shos [2]

Not Voting:
[0]


Day 1 ends in (expired on 2013-11-21 16:22:00)

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:24 am
by shos
In post 247, Desperado wrote:
In post 245, shos wrote:
eh crap, mod, can you make that [/post] become [/spoiler]?


and uh, my plan will result in a death of some of the most scummy people, and in case some of them don't die and others do, we will be able to say what's going on: based on the number of kills know if the CPR/quack is in both groups or just in one, if there are two deaths not on the trio then one is scum having killed the weak doc, easy to determine which kill is the mafia's nightkill, etc.
Can you link to a completed game where this strategy was used and the town won?
No, but you're proving the rule with the case instead of the opposite.

the fact that 1+1=2 does not mean that 3+3=2 and 1545+1545=2. the fact that two games were won using the strategy does not mean that it is an autowin. otherwise, the game would not be balanced as an open game.

I enter opens (mostly) to try and play new setups. this is a setup I've never seen before, and my strategy is the best thing I could come up with, while not investing many minutes of thought. on those minutes, I managed to find holes in your strategy, and could not find a one, single occasion where it is good for town when random luck is RANDOM and not pro-town.

on the same note, someone quickly ISO RationalMadman and see what % of his posts(should be under 10 imo) has content.

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:28 am
by T S O
5.

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:44 am
by RationalMadman
0%

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:47 am
by T S O
5/55 is actually 1/11, just under 10%.

cmon bro

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:29 am
by RationalMadman
Image

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:30 am
by RationalMadman
hey nurse should out and lead a random bw lol

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:34 am
by RationalMadman
see my plan:

1) nurse outs and lynches a random motherfucker
2) all doc on nurse so weak one can't die and cpr one will die for sure [if no more than one person dies n1, it means the one we lynched d1 was cpr or that the one maf killed was cpr]
3) on d4 we laugh and bully the nurse for lynching wrong d1 or congratulate them for doing so and let them lead based on how good their d1 RL was

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:44 am
by RationalMadman
i mean d2, d3 and d4 for step 3

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:09 pm
by shos
FFS RM, are you going to try to play the game or are you just going to troll?

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:39 pm
by RationalMadman
my idea is genius.

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:46 pm
by bazinga
In post 242, shos wrote:
In post 230, bazinga wrote:
In post 225, shos wrote:kay I'm stopping in start of page 8. what I have to say is this:
if each of us targets the one above them, that means that quack doc and CPR doc are 100% killing. in such a case, 2 kills will surely happen. mafia can theoretically stop one if they target the CPR's target, but meh.

this means that mathematically, we have good chance of hitting at least one scum. the bad thing is these chances aren't that good, so we also ahve good chances of losing three peeps in N1.

what do you think about we go through this day and pic two most scummy targets, and then, half targets one and half targets the other? or 3-3-3?
nope, it defeats the purpose. I would rather stick with something that has worked before.
it worked by luck, and only by luck. if you give me any scenario where, without being lucky, you get any information from doing that, I'll give you a cookie.
I did you give you a scenario.

in the very first link I posted.

that you apparently somehow missed. you do realise I was in both games right? mebbe you should see wtf I am talking about.

in the first game that I linked, we caught scum out cos scum did exactly what both tso and rat thing did; they stumbled when talking about the role pm. I think in the game I linked the caughtscum tried to say he was reaction testing lololol. I am good with either of tso or rat thing's lynch for that reason.

I think it was 3 town down on d2. by poe, we were able to narrow down what kind of doc the remaining players were.

n2 2 more town down

d3 was lylo and scum were caught by simple poe. town win \o/

and just a thought, mebbe you should how the game played out before for jumping to an erroneous conclusion backed by insufficient information.

I now want my cookie.

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:18 pm
by RationalMadman
bazinga is the VI :D

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:45 pm
by shos
...you didn't give me the link :roll:

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:01 pm
by bazinga
the link has already been provided itt as has been mentioned like 4 times

do your own legwork

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:30 pm
by shos
Got your game.
Read day 2 please.

The night actions are literally not talked about.

Also, scum was lynched d1, and the other was stupid enough to not shoot the one below them, so that TWO kills were wasted.

Im not counting on scum being stupid and unlucky to win.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:44 am
by shos
^^ I posted this like 10 hours ago during a course from my phone, and suddenly nobody speaks.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:35 am
by T S O
I tripped on my role PM

Are you fucking kidding me? Read the game, mollie.

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:24 am
by shos
huh?

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:46 am
by RationalMadman
mollie getting attacked by the army avi!

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:05 am
by T S O
I'm saying if mollie really believes that, she's a fucking moron.