Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 8:35 pm
In post 251, Street Hassle wrote:Looking forward to it.
In post 257, Street Hassle wrote:Man, it's scary how our reads are quite similar to yours (same reasoning on a lot of them too).
This is...strange. Does he just always scum read you either way?Herself wrote: what if I told you that fitz's vote on me is the safest vote he can possibly make since he has voted me in nearly every single game we have ever been in
First instinct would be Banksys. Though I had to admit a town flip on you would significantly increase my suspicion of fitz, so I'd probably reevaluate my read on him.Herself wrote: if we were dayvigged right now and you finally had to face the fact that you have been tunneling on town for shoddy reasons who would you go after next?
In post 257, Street Hassle wrote: I'm about to crash but I've been conflicted on TvK for basically the entire game. I remember at some point he said he townread my slot for "asking him a question" and that raised my eyebrow
I know I throw the word "like" around a bit too often, but here I didn't mean it in a townread-way. I just stated that I'm way more productive when people ask me questions throughout the game.In post 65, TvK wrote:I like Street Hassle for asking me questions. I always come up with better things when answering people's questions.
I got the exact opposite vibe from you when I read through, there's a lot of people you've voiced concern with and it's one of my largest issues with you; reads as leaving lots of doors open for later. But lets run through this, who do you currently have read as town and why?In post 261, TvK wrote:Anyway, I'm having a hard time reading people in here.Too many people come across as town
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAIn post 255, Regfan wrote:It hurts to say this, it really does you have no idea how long I tried to convince myself "Well that can be faked, they can still be scum!" or "Mollies line of attack on Street for their town read on Orestes is bad, they might be scum!!" when following the game hoping that I'd be able to lynch them but I'm pretty sureHerselfare town.
You made one particularly town post that gave me an early town read on you like page 2. After that you've backed off in to a lot of quieter, tossing out a few observations here and there, mode of play that hasn't involved much scum hunting outside a little pressure on lurkers. You definitely haven't been scummy, but I haven't seen a lot of content lately that would maintain a town read.Garmr wrote: But ice you were the one who started the garmr love why do you deny me and my loving embrace.
You started off looking quite town and it's hard to drop confirmation bias, regardless if its regarding town or scum. Just think about N is for normal, I wasn't able to see anything Elyse did as scum because of that one tell that I thought was so monstrously town she couldn't possibly be scum.Garmr wrote: On a serious note what do you think they are letting me off easy with?
I mean yeah I suppose that is a possibility too. I just feel that, in my experience, town doubting the wagon and such when voting someone means they're voting town, and scum voting someone but doubting the wagon are trying to get credit for being on a scum wagon while still trying to dismantle it. And of course it was different, I'm not interested in lynching fitz based on alignment-neutral page 1 posts and a catchup post that resonated with my feelings on the state of the game.Nutsy McSexytail wrote: Why can't I be hesitant town and he be scum that I'm wrongly doubting a read on? Also, is what I did any different than what you did?
I actually agree with this. I was so caught up on post 31 that I didn't realize that 33 was indeed a very town reaction to the explanation.Regfan wrote: Naw, Post 33 was actually pretty townie, surprised you missed it and yeah, I did the meta-reading before I replaced in, wanted to be sure (Still wasn't 100% sure but confident enough) and you've misread that entirely too.