It is funny how you claim the town cannotr afford a mistake yet you place your vote on a person for reasons ANOTHER player gave. Aother player might I add who is no longer in the game and was clearly just going along with his BFF Zoneace attacking random players with no real reasons behind it...bubka wrote:That reasoning makes sense, and since it's time I started voting:Mastermind of Sin wrote:First off, BM is retarded if he put a Jester in this game. Jesters should never be considered Champions.
Secondly, I think it's pretty obvious at this point that DragonsofSummer and Schis are scum together. DoS's case against Draux was SO much weaker than the one he put up against Schis, and Draux's behavior could have been attributed to newb/idiot/apparently jester behavior, instead of scum. Schis doesn't have that excuse.
Vote: Schismatized
Vote: schismatized
But I still find Zoneace's agression unnerving. Perhaps its lack of experience in mafia games. I'll keep an eye on him though.The town can't afford many mistakes now...
Mini 511-Match of Champions Mafia! GAME OVER!
Forum rules
FOS: Bubka
- DragonsofSummer
- DragonsofSummer
-
DragonsofSummer
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1640
- Joined: January 22, 2007
- Location: In the Shadows...
- DragonsofSummer
- DragonsofSummer
-
DragonsofSummer
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1640
- Joined: January 22, 2007
- Location: In the Shadows...
- schismatized
- schismatized
-
schismatized
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 490
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: The frying pan.
This man is probably right. I'd say probably two simply because otherwise you'd be in quicklynch range, and you're not dead yet. I'm assuming schis' innocence for now - new info might change that, but until I really look at things I'm not gonna jump on Zone's wagon.schismatized wrote:So I'm at -2 when Im not the one who has pushed for a townie lynch. Ill bet you anything that at least 1 scum is voting for me.
Initial thoughts after a VERY quick skim:
Zoneace - the sheer audacity of your lambasting everyone might be the only thing that keeps anyone from in turn suspecting you.
bubka: where were you? I'm surprised I replaced MoS and not you.
Nocmen: I think you're even lurkier than bubka, personally, because you've been the least confrontational out of everyone here and completely afraid to go out on a limb. At least he voted semi-aggressively.
These thoughts are based on what I gleaned to be people's general playing styles throughout this topic - I might've missed some logical chain of events that might've cleared any one of those three. If you are one of them and would like to point out something blatant that I missed, please do so.
Serious analysis still to come.
- Numenorean7
- Numenorean7
-
Numenorean7
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 597
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Arizona, USA
The only thing stopping me from voting ZA is the fact that MoS vouched for his playstyle. But MoS isn't here now....
1) His "theory" did not help the town, and he outed a mason in pursuing it.
2) He's been insulting people and flying off the handle when people expressed any doubt or suspicion about him or his plan.
3) He was a supporter of the streeflo mislynch, and kept pressing for a claim which he ignored.
4) He's pushing the Schiz easywagon.
ZA fits the profile of rolefishing scum. MoS says that this is ZA's pro-town playstyle, but that's a very subjective argument at best, not to mention the fact that MoS could be scum.
@ZA:
Why haven't you reevaluated anyone since Day 1? You seem to be voting Schis through a chain-lynch mentality, but your two previous suspects were both mislynched. Don't you think it might be time to reconsider the game?
1) His "theory" did not help the town, and he outed a mason in pursuing it.
2) He's been insulting people and flying off the handle when people expressed any doubt or suspicion about him or his plan.
3) He was a supporter of the streeflo mislynch, and kept pressing for a claim which he ignored.
4) He's pushing the Schiz easywagon.
ZA fits the profile of rolefishing scum. MoS says that this is ZA's pro-town playstyle, but that's a very subjective argument at best, not to mention the fact that MoS could be scum.
Vote: ZONEACE
@ZA:
Why haven't you reevaluated anyone since Day 1? You seem to be voting Schis through a chain-lynch mentality, but your two previous suspects were both mislynched. Don't you think it might be time to reconsider the game?
Political Correctness offends me.
what is an FOS?Nelly632 wrote:It is funny how you claim the town cannotr afford a mistake yet you place your vote on a person for reasons ANOTHER player gave. Aother player might I add who is no longer in the game and was clearly just going along with his BFF Zoneace attacking random players with no real reasons behind it...bubka wrote:That reasoning makes sense, and since it's time I started voting:Mastermind of Sin wrote:First off, BM is retarded if he put a Jester in this game. Jesters should never be considered Champions.
Secondly, I think it's pretty obvious at this point that DragonsofSummer and Schis are scum together. DoS's case against Draux was SO much weaker than the one he put up against Schis, and Draux's behavior could have been attributed to newb/idiot/apparently jester behavior, instead of scum. Schis doesn't have that excuse.
Vote: Schismatized
Vote: schismatized
But I still find Zoneace's agression unnerving. Perhaps its lack of experience in mafia games. I'll keep an eye on him though.The town can't afford many mistakes now...
FOS: Bubka
and if I find a reasoning acceptable, why can't I go with it?
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
- Numenorean7
- Numenorean7
-
Numenorean7
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 597
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Battle Mage
- Battle Mage
-
Battle Mage
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Vote Count
Schizmatised 3 (Zoneace, Bubka, DragonsofSummer)
Zoneace 1 (Numenorean7)
Not Voting: Nelly632, DGMavn, Schizmatised, Nocmen
8 Alive, 5 to lynch.
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
- schismatized
- schismatized
-
schismatized
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 490
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: The frying pan.
- ZONEACE
- ZONEACE
-
ZONEACE
- There's no F in ZONEFACE
- There's no F in ZONEFACE
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: November 10, 2003
- Location: Harlem NYC
- Contact:
schismatized wrote:almost everything YOU'VE done lately has made me doubt your alignment/mafia skill. The 03 join date cant really be right?ZONEACE wrote:almost everything you've done recently has made me doubt your mason claim.Nelly632 wrote:Vote: Zoneace
BM its obvious he is continuously trying to bait me. Dont you think its about time you did something? you got rid of MOS for kind of swearing, schis continues to go against what you've said.
Late twenties, early Thursdays
- ZONEACE
- ZONEACE
-
ZONEACE
- There's no F in ZONEFACE
- There's no F in ZONEFACE
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: November 10, 2003
- Location: Harlem NYC
- Contact:
bubka wrote:Happy birthday DGMavn!
Okay so I get FoS now.
And I'll pick up the fashion and say:
FoS: ZONEACEfor the continuing fight with schis.
whos fighting? hes trying to bait me and Im not falling for it, and why no FOS on him?
FOS bubka
for total absence and blatant ignorance of the facts.
seriously you've like NOT PARTICIPATED In this game at all, and you still aren't. your post is 25 words and half of them don't even pertain to the game, not to mention you give NO real opinion of anything. you're either scum, or you just dont care about the game at all. either way you're being COMPLETELY unhelpful to the town and are highly suspect.
seriously you've like NOT PARTICIPATED In this game at all, and you still aren't. your post is 25 words and half of them don't even pertain to the game, not to mention you give NO real opinion of anything. you're either scum, or you just dont care about the game at all. either way you're being COMPLETELY unhelpful to the town and are highly suspect.
Late twenties, early Thursdays
- Numenorean7
- Numenorean7
-
Numenorean7
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 597
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Arizona, USA
- ZONEACE
- ZONEACE
-
ZONEACE
- There's no F in ZONEFACE
- There's no F in ZONEFACE
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: November 10, 2003
- Location: Harlem NYC
- Contact:
nothing, its more than just the vote though. Ive been suspicious for a while now.Numenorean7 wrote:What about a mason makes them less likely to vote for you?ZONEACE wrote:almost everything you've done recently has made me doubt your mason claim.Nelly632 wrote:Vote: Zoneace
until nelly is dead and the role is revealed or the other mason turns up dead I'm gonna be very wary.
Late twenties, early Thursdays
Vote: ZONEACE
1. For pushing a chainlynch of schis for reasons that I cannot comprehend even after multiple rereads.
2. (This assumes scum size of 3.) If we have not yet lynched schis and he's at L-2 (and has been for a couple days), that means that he's outside quicklynch range. That means 2 (or three) of the scum are already voting for him. A mislynch here and a successful NK would be win for the scum (3v3). For my money, ZONE and bubka look the scummiest - but ZONE is clearly the more dangerous. Nothing personal, bubka, but though you be scum, I'm much more comfortable outmanuevering you in an endgame.
3. You and bubka have been throwing fingers back and forth in some desperate dance of association and distancing. Scumtastic - but as I said, ZONE is the more dangerous of the two.
ZONE today, bubka tomorrow.
Show
DGMavn.
Not DCMavn, EGMavn, DGMavin, DJMavin, or DMVagn.
D-G-M-a-v-n.
Get it right.
Scum: 1/0/0
ProTown: 0/0/0
Not DCMavn, EGMavn, DGMavin, DJMavin, or DMVagn.
D-G-M-a-v-n.
Get it right.
Scum: 1/0/0
ProTown: 0/0/0
- schismatized
- schismatized
-
schismatized
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 490
- Joined: May 27, 2007
- Location: The frying pan.