Page 11 of 13
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 5:42 am
by Nelly632
bubka wrote:Mastermind of Sin wrote:First off, BM is retarded if he put a Jester in this game. Jesters should never be considered Champions.
Secondly, I think it's pretty obvious at this point that DragonsofSummer and Schis are scum together. DoS's case against Draux was SO much weaker than the one he put up against Schis, and Draux's behavior could have been attributed to newb/idiot/apparently jester behavior, instead of scum. Schis doesn't have that excuse.
Vote: Schismatized
That reasoning makes sense, and since it's time I started voting:
Vote: schismatized
But I still find Zoneace's agression unnerving. Perhaps its lack of experience in mafia games. I'll keep an eye on him though.
The town can't afford many mistakes now.
..
It is funny how you claim the town cannotr afford a mistake yet you place your vote on a person for reasons ANOTHER player gave. Aother player might I add who is no longer in the game and was clearly just going along with his BFF Zoneace attacking random players with no real reasons behind it...
FOS: Bubka
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:32 am
by DragonsofSummer
That is a very slanted way of viewing the way MoS played the game Nelly.
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:33 am
by DragonsofSummer
EBWOP: As I stated yesterday
Vote Schismatized
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:08 am
by schismatized
So I'm at -2 when Im not the one who has pushed for a townie lynch. Ill bet you anything that at least 1 scum is voting for me.
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 9:52 am
by DGMavn
schismatized wrote:So I'm at -2 when Im not the one who has pushed for a townie lynch. Ill bet you anything that at least 1 scum is voting for me.
This man is probably right. I'd say probably two simply because otherwise you'd be in quicklynch range, and you're not dead yet. I'm assuming schis' innocence for now - new info might change that, but until I really look at things I'm not gonna jump on Zone's wagon.
Initial thoughts after a VERY quick skim:
Zoneace - the sheer audacity of your lambasting everyone might be the only thing that keeps anyone from in turn suspecting you.
bubka: where were you? I'm surprised I replaced MoS and not you.
Nocmen: I think you're even lurkier than bubka, personally, because you've been the least confrontational out of everyone here and completely afraid to go out on a limb. At least he voted semi-aggressively.
These thoughts are based on what I gleaned to be people's general playing styles throughout this topic - I might've missed some logical chain of events that might've cleared any one of those three. If you are one of them and would like to point out something blatant that I missed, please do so.
Serious analysis still to come.
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:28 pm
by Numenorean7
The only thing stopping me from voting ZA is the fact that MoS vouched for his playstyle. But MoS isn't here now....
1) His "theory" did not help the town, and he outed a mason in pursuing it.
2) He's been insulting people and flying off the handle when people expressed any doubt or suspicion about him or his plan.
3) He was a supporter of the streeflo mislynch, and kept pressing for a claim which he ignored.
4) He's pushing the Schiz easywagon.
ZA fits the profile of rolefishing scum. MoS says that this is ZA's pro-town playstyle, but that's a very subjective argument at best, not to mention the fact that MoS could be scum.
Vote: ZONEACE
@ZA:
Why haven't you reevaluated anyone since Day 1? You seem to be voting Schis through a chain-lynch mentality, but your two previous suspects were both mislynched. Don't you think it might be time to reconsider the game?
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:30 pm
by bubka
Nelly632 wrote:bubka wrote:Mastermind of Sin wrote:First off, BM is retarded if he put a Jester in this game. Jesters should never be considered Champions.
Secondly, I think it's pretty obvious at this point that DragonsofSummer and Schis are scum together. DoS's case against Draux was SO much weaker than the one he put up against Schis, and Draux's behavior could have been attributed to newb/idiot/apparently jester behavior, instead of scum. Schis doesn't have that excuse.
Vote: Schismatized
That reasoning makes sense, and since it's time I started voting:
Vote: schismatized
But I still find Zoneace's agression unnerving. Perhaps its lack of experience in mafia games. I'll keep an eye on him though.
The town can't afford many mistakes now.
..
It is funny how you claim the town cannotr afford a mistake yet you place your vote on a person for reasons ANOTHER player gave. Aother player might I add who is no longer in the game and was clearly just going along with his BFF Zoneace attacking random players with no real reasons behind it...
FOS: Bubka
what is an FOS?
and if I find a reasoning acceptable, why can't I go with it?
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:35 pm
by Numenorean7
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:16 pm
by Battle Mage
Schizmatised 3 (Zoneace, Bubka, DragonsofSummer)
Zoneace 1 (Numenorean7)
Not Voting: Nelly632, DGMavn, Schizmatised, Nocmen
8 Alive, 5 to lynch.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:18 am
by Nelly632
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:45 am
by DGMavn
Nelly632 wrote:Vote: Zoneace
Interesting. I'm tempted to agree with you, but why do you think so?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:37 am
by ZONEACE
Nelly632 wrote:Vote: Zoneace
almost everything you've done recently has made me doubt your mason claim.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 12:35 pm
by schismatized
ZONEACE wrote:Nelly632 wrote:Vote: Zoneace
almost everything you've done recently has made me doubt your mason claim.
almost everything YOU'VE done lately has made me doubt your alignment/mafia skill. The 03 join date cant really be right?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 12:38 pm
by Nocmen
Nelly632 wrote:Vote: Zoneace
Care to elaborate?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 12:46 pm
by ZONEACE
schismatized wrote:ZONEACE wrote:Nelly632 wrote:Vote: Zoneace
almost everything you've done recently has made me doubt your mason claim.
almost everything YOU'VE done lately has made me doubt your alignment/mafia skill. The 03 join date cant really be right?
BM its obvious he is continuously trying to bait me. Dont you think its about time you did something? you got rid of MOS for kind of swearing, schis continues to go against what you've said.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:13 pm
by bubka
Happy birthday DGMavn!
Okay so I get FoS now.
And I'll pick up the fashion and say:
FoS: ZONEACE
for the continuing fight with schis.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:19 pm
by ZONEACE
bubka wrote:Happy birthday DGMavn!
Okay so I get FoS now.
And I'll pick up the fashion and say:
FoS: ZONEACE
for the continuing fight with schis.
whos fighting? hes trying to bait me and Im not falling for it, and why no FOS on him?
FOS bubka
for total absence and blatant ignorance of the facts.
seriously you've like NOT PARTICIPATED In this game at all, and you still aren't. your post is 25 words and half of them don't even pertain to the game, not to mention you give NO real opinion of anything. you're either scum, or you just dont care about the game at all. either way you're being COMPLETELY unhelpful to the town and are highly suspect.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:19 pm
by ZONEACE
Dear mod, please fix my bold tags.
your's truly,
ZONEACE
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:45 pm
by Numenorean7
ZONEACE wrote:Nelly632 wrote:Vote: Zoneace
almost everything you've done recently has made me doubt your mason claim.
What about a mason makes them less likely to vote for you?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:55 pm
by ZONEACE
Numenorean7 wrote:ZONEACE wrote:Nelly632 wrote:Vote: Zoneace
almost everything you've done recently has made me doubt your mason claim.
What about a mason makes them less likely to vote for you?
nothing, its more than just the vote though. Ive been suspicious for a while now.
until nelly is dead and the role is revealed or the other mason turns up dead I'm gonna be very wary.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:59 am
by DGMavn
Vote: ZONEACE
1. For pushing a chainlynch of schis for reasons that I cannot comprehend even after multiple rereads.
2. (This assumes scum size of 3.) If we have not yet lynched schis and he's at L-2 (and has been for a couple days), that means that he's outside quicklynch range. That means 2 (or three) of the scum are already voting for him. A mislynch here and a successful NK would be win for the scum (3v3). For my money, ZONE and bubka look the scummiest - but ZONE is clearly the more dangerous. Nothing personal, bubka, but though you be scum, I'm much more comfortable outmanuevering you in an endgame.
3. You and bubka have been throwing fingers back and forth in some desperate dance of association and distancing. Scumtastic - but as I said, ZONE is the more dangerous of the two.
ZONE today, bubka tomorrow.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:04 am
by ZONEACE
wow this is absolutely ridiculous. Luching me is not the right move. Lynching schis or bubka is.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 12:42 pm
by schismatized
I agree with DG mavn 100 percent. Notice bubka FOS'd ZA but didnt vote him. I will tho.
vote zoneace
i agree, zone today bubka tomorrow.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 12:48 pm
by ZONEACE
Hahah this is so pathetic.
HE JUST PUT ME AT -1 if it isn't obvious who the scum is, then well you're blind.
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 12:49 pm
by ZONEACE
oha nd if you lynch me the game is over, as DG said. My death puts its a 3-4, then the kill tonight puts it at 3-3, scum win.
LYNCH SCHIS NOW.