Page 11 of 29

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:40 pm
by Zyf
In post 247, Sickofit1138 wrote:
@Zyf


I'm good with either. They are pretty equally scummy.
Vandit probably easiest lynch.

I DO NOT want to rush this vote!
I want to take the FULL ALLOTTED TIME.

I would maybe wait, If I was cop , till you've found a scum. If I just found an inno I would keep it for now.
The only other reason I would claim was if I was put at L-1, and that goes for any PR
Yes, I definitely agree. When I voted sad, it was because it was going to apply more pressure than if I kept my vote on you. However, a certain vandit24 caused an unfortunate early lynch.

Let's get everyone's thoughts post-Night 1 into the thread before we make any rash decisions, starting with Beeboy and Rask.
Oh right I'd like to request a prod onto dvds part. They have been missing for quite a while.

PEdit: Whoa, nice catch on the inconsistency sick. That being said, it was mainly ranger and you until the quickhammer.
I think I'll move you to nulltown.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:40 pm
by Vandit24
@Sick i do not know why didnt you even changed your vote on sad (before night 1) and just went on going (since start of day 1)without any debates or knowning anything and till the end.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:43 pm
by Vandit24
@Zyf if you will notice because i noticed that if you read this whole thread (since start) when people actually do random voting and stuff for fun.. sick was the only guy who voted for sad and till the end when we all were saying he is innocent etc (in the middle, not towards the end) still he didnt unvote him. And again didnt unvote sad till he was lynched. I voted for him for a reason,but he.. just no reason.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:45 pm
by Sickofit1138
In post 251, Vandit24 wrote:@Sick i do not know why didnt you even changed your vote on sad (before night 1) and just went on going (since start of day 1)without any debates or knowning anything and till the end.
I had no argument as to why he was town and he was obviously the scummiest one to me.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:46 pm
by Sickofit1138
In post 252, Vandit24 wrote:@Zyf if you will notice because i noticed that if you read this whole thread (since start) when people actually do random voting and stuff for fun.. sick was the only guy who voted for sad and till the end when we all were saying he is innocent etc (in the middle, not towards the end) still he didnt unvote him. And again didnt unvote sad till he was lynched. I voted for him for a reason,but he.. just no reason.
I never felt moved to take it off. At least I didn't change my vote six times and *ahem* quick hammer somebody. ;)

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:47 pm
by Vandit24
So you voted him and went with him anyway?? And yes..you voted him just after like some hours those whole thread actually started.. why??

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:48 pm
by Vandit24
The*

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:49 pm
by Zyf
Vandit-
First off, please stop quoting moderator posts. That's against the rules.
Second off, the difference between then and now is very clear. Sad was about to get lynched. In this situation, you're just kind of wildly waving fingers towards inactivity.
Thirdly, you seem to desperately be finding ways to push anyone that accuses you of being scummy as being scum themselves. When ranger did it, you said that they were posting lots of irrelevant stuff. Here, you accuse me of "distracting" people from finding beeboy scummy due to supposed "lurking."
Your only way to defend yourself seems to be accusing people that they are hiding the truth by posting unhelpful information.

What we need from you as a town is not statements about what isn't there ("missing" posts), what we need is solid evidence leading to some sort of scummy player.

Once again, I'd like to ask you to respect beeboy's status and stop calling them scummy just because they have posted very little. Real life exists.

PEdit: You had absolutely no reasoning in place, and your vote had significantly more importance as the kill vote. Also, while sick wasn't being very active on the thread, you had plenty of time to see/read and realize that your vote could cause us to lynch an innocent. Unless you WANTED to. That is much more scummy than sick's RVS vote that he never had TIME or reason to take off.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:51 pm
by Vandit24
My suspicions have been on Beeboy and now on Sickofit and obviously there are 2 mafias

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:53 pm
by Vandit24
Zyf if real life exists for beeboy ..why is she online right now and still not posting anywhere for hours..online means she is on Mafiascum.net

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 3:56 pm
by Sickofit1138
As you said yourself Vandit, she wouldn't be inactive posting nowhere. She is 100% AFK and if you can't deal with that then... It's just sad.

I'm catching up and reading ISOs to solidify my read on Vandit and hopefully if he is scum find a scum buddy.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:00 pm
by Sickofit1138
In post 259, Vandit24 wrote:Zyf if real life exists for beeboy ..why is she online right now and still not posting anywhere for hours..online means she is on Mafiascum.net
... Sounds like you are attacking someone's personal life.

@Mod

Can you address this please?

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:00 pm
by Vandit24
If a person isnt scumhunting, not debating, doing discussions and is still online on the website and providing excuses for being sick. If someone is sick ..can you literally see him being online for hours and hours ahead for long times and comig again and again. If you dont know where the list for online people is..its on Board Index and below. And i have seen her after night 1 for like alot of time for long long time everytimd which might indicate that she was doing something scums do..not even posting on any other threads as well being here.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:01 pm
by Vandit24
I dont see personal life being attacked anywhere..

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:03 pm
by Zyf
In post 261, Sickofit1138 wrote:
In post 259, Vandit24 wrote:Zyf if real life exists for beeboy ..why is she online right now and still not posting anywhere for hours..online means she is on Mafiascum.net
... Sounds like you are attacking someone's personal life.

@Mod

Can you address this please?
+1 to mod involvement

Jeebis Vandit, leaving tabs open without using them is a thing. Respect other people's privacy, god.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:05 pm
by Sickofit1138
I'm gonna stay out of this completely until the mod addresses this.

I believe that's exactly your intent. You are saying he is lying about his life and that he is not
REALLY
sick and I would consider that calling somebody a liar in their personal life and this attacking it.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:06 pm
by Sickofit1138
Anyways I'm Nona be on the mishmash and playing chess, hope my being online and not postin here isn't gonna get me tunneled at :/

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:12 pm
by Zyf
Ok, just reread through Fox's iso, and they parked their vote on sad as their rvs vote. Then they read through the forum, posted a giant post pointing to me as scum, then
left their vote on sad
. That isn't right. It seems like a facade to get people to think they're scum by posting (actually quite meaningful, props) lots of information, yet in the background sneakily keeping their vote on their real prey. I can def. see a Vandit Fox team, as they are more likely as newbies to join the same wagon less discreetely than a more experienced pair would.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:21 pm
by beeboy
I want to tackle this game when I can actually think critically not when I am in pain in my bed.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:22 pm
by Sickofit1138
Honestly Fox and Vandit feels like the only viable scum team to me.
Xvandit is 98% scum for me and that makes fox that as well and here's why:

Vandit/beeboy I don't think Vandit would go for an early bus it's not natutral as a newbie.
Vandit/Zyf not scum/scum interractions and Zyf is town lean anyways.
Vandit/DVD? Too inactive I think to be scum.
Vandit/fox a thousand yesses there play is the same and they are moving together which furthermore says scum team for me.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:22 pm
by beeboy
VOTE: vandit

I didn't like the hammer.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:24 pm
by Sickofit1138
In post 268, beeboy wrote:I want to tackle this game when I can actually think critically not when I am in pain in my bed.
I understand and I'm sure most people will as well. Hope you feel better!
Life always comes first its the most important.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:31 pm
by Zyf
Yo beeboy is it like a migrane or something?
Also keep an eye on the votecount sick. Make sure you don't put vandit at L-1 like I did with sick

Rask get in here when you can
Ranger is dead in game and beeboy's shot irl

Here's the thing sick-I could personally envision you and vandit being the 3rd most likely scumteam (after dvds)-you were also odd wih your vote at the beginning of the match. That being said, the interaction between you doesn't really seem like you are friends...imo the scum's partner would be more tolerant about their attitude as a whole. Idk.
I'm glad we're on the same page tho.

PS get well soon beeboy
Try sleeping instead of trying futilely to play mafia on a forum while in pain
We (most of us, anyway) completely understand.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:39 pm
by Sickofit1138
No I understand I can understand being unde suspicion for being kind of inactive and never changing my vote. No one Is cons town at this point unless their dead. Btw I'm not trying or wanting to buddy you if it seems like that sorry. but yeah glad to have time and discuss reads and to get pointed out things I missed.

Fmpov Vandot is very, very, very suspect and the only way he'll get out of it is if he comes up with some outstanding evidence to the contrary of him being scum.

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:43 pm
by Sickofit1138
In post 272, Zyf wrote: Also keep an eye on the votecount sick. Make sure you don't put vandit at L-1 like I did with sad
Got it.
Vandit at L-2!