Mafiascum.net

you're acting like you're obvious town. fuck off with the lamist posts.

(3): karnos, SirCakez, Transcend
(3): DixC, Maruchan, PenguinPower
(2): Smithereens, Chip Butty
(2): Ranger, MURDERCAT
(1): drmyshottyizsik
(1): podoboq
(1): Aneninen

(0):

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

: (expired on 2016-07-02 13:00:24)

Man this game is slow as shit.

In post 252, MURDERCAT wrote:Man this game is slow as shit.

You're right. Let's speed it up.
VOTE: Ranger

I think Ranger is probably town now though.

I'm serious re read cakez

In post 238, drmyshottyizsik wrote:VOTE: cakes
I find it hugely scummy when you are trying to get others to produce content when your content is eh and rather than do anything your self you just seem to sheep and demand the opinion of others.

p edit
oh what a surprise the latest wagon you are scum reading, but are carefully not yet voting eh

The first part makes no sense
The second should be obvious, I'd rather pressure active people then lurkers

In post 232, Ranger wrote:

Murdercat wrote:I implied it might be because Ranger can be lazy as scum (my experience with her suggests this is the case).

Lazy is literally my playstyle.

Where do you think I got into the habit of posting nothing but readslists in the first place?

SirCakez wrote:Why do I feel like you're barely doing anything here?

Because I'm barely doing anything here?

DixC wrote:Ranger, comparing post rates and updates I see a significant difference in this game: what are some queries that might help you out here?

Mostly, talking to others. I suppose talking to me is not without benefits, but I can't think of anything. Like I said, largely reactionary.
{karnos, Aneninen}
{SirCakez}
{Smithereens, shotty, Chip Butty, Murdercat}
{DixC}
{Maruchan, Transcend}
{podoboq, PenguinPower}

Scum read: too lazy to do work but so not-lazy that you'll work on telling people that you're lazy? Also preternatural lack of lazy basis for good outcomes... crazy, yes, lazy, no.

Town Read:Not concerned enough with my question to actually answer it. Has podoboq at bottom of the list.

In post 215, Aneninen wrote:

In post 25, karnos wrote:On the one hand, this game is off to a very slow start.
On the other hand, I'm curious to see how ranger's read lists look with such a small sample of posts to read from.

Whut?
As the first post on Page2?

Maruchan's 27 is forced. Scummy.
Murdercat has noticed it in 28. Good. Townish.

In post 41, drmyshottyizsik wrote:VOTE: karnos
game to slow? let's get a wagon rolling!

L-2

La wow! If Maruchan's scum, Shotty's scum too.

In post 55, Chip Butty wrote:

In post 54, podoboq wrote:

In post 53, Chip Butty wrote:

In post 52, podoboq wrote:and an inconsistency worth owning up to.

Hate to be that guy, man, but that looks an awful lot like coaching.

No, I'm saying that he should have owned up to it. He didn't. He defended the inconsistency, and it's the fact that he didn't own up to it that's a problem.

WTF? I made the point about taking pressure of in #50. #51 was unrelated, from Karnos. And that quote I said could have been coaching was in #52. Shooty didn't reply at all to #50, but you say he defended the inconsistency??? That's BS, pure and simple.
Now you are definitely on my scumdar.

Parrot Bebop.

Podoboq seems to be flailing, eg. 56.

In post 66, Ranger wrote:{karnos}
{SirCakez}
{Aneninen, Murdercat, Smithereens}
{Chip Butty, shotty}
{Maruchan, DicX, PenguinPower, Transcend}
{podoboq}

Ranger's town again. Good to know.

scum read: is scum if maruchan and shorty are scum
town read: is not scum if Ranger is scum

In post 178, podoboq wrote:OK, so Maru is basically obv town to me. If you don't understand why, try treading what he posts. If it still doesn't make sense to you, slap yourself in the face three times, then ask me why, and I'll spell out for you how Maru is being the most supportive of pro-town play and showing the most opposition toward people who are showing anti-town play.

Scum read: is scum
Town read: is scum

In post 251, davesaz wrote:

Official Vote Count

Smithereens

(3): karnos, SirCakez, Transcend

Ranger

(3): DixC, Maruchan, PenguinPower

drmyshottyizsik

(2): Smithereens, Chip Butty

PenguinPower

(2): Ranger, MURDERCAT

SirCakez

(1): drmyshottyizsik

MURDERCAT

(1): podoboq

podoboq

(1): Aneninen

Not Voting

(0):

None.

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline

: (expired on 2016-07-02 13:00:24)

tfw only actual vote on this slot is by someone who i didn't even know was in the game

oh i was referring to podo's slot fwiw.

Murdercat wrote:What makes you dislike that post Ranger?

...Stuff.

I know that's a cop-out (no pun intended, given the setup) answer, but I'm actually not in the state of mind where I can answer. Just getting caught up in all of my games and going to sleep for tonight. (I'm planning on putting more attention into them over the weekend.)

SirCakez wrote:Pls do more then.

I'll do more when I feel like it. (And have energy for it, which I don't, but the feeling like it is just as important.) I currently do not.

DixC wrote:too lazy to do work but so not-lazy that you'll work on telling people that you're lazy?

The way it works is that I'll be lazy until I don't feel like being lazy anymore.

And my definition of lazy is basically "doing the least amount of effort on a task". So the above also has a second out: if "amount of time/effort spent explaining laziness" > "amount of time/effort spent explaining reads", then, yeah, obviously at that point I'll just explain them.

In short, I'll either explain reads when I feel like it, or when explaining reads is the least troublesome thing for me to do.
Neither condition has been met. The latter almost never happens, the former probably will...soonish. Won't give an exact timeframe, it usually depends on the gamestate more than time passed.

If you don't have time to explain your reads ranger you could just reveal your strongest scum read and reasons for that one alone. It seems more useful than a list of names...

Smithereens wrote:If you don't have time to explain your reads ranger you could just reveal your strongest scum read and reasons for that one alone. It seems more useful than a list of names...

Even that takes time. My vote's on Penguin, and Penguin only had one post between being a bit higher (that wasn't a good tier to be in though), and being my vote, so it shouldn't be hard to guess that post served as the catalyst for a degrading already-bad read. The other reads I, respectfully, decline to identify even the strength of at this time. That's info I want people to guess.

Still don't have a good feeling about Ranger, but after podoboq's most recent post, switching back to him.

UNVOTE: Ranger
VOTE: podoboq

In post 258, Transcend wrote:

In post 251, davesaz wrote:

Official Vote Count

Smithereens

(3): karnos, SirCakez, Transcend

Ranger

(3): DixC, Maruchan, PenguinPower

drmyshottyizsik

(2): Smithereens, Chip Butty

PenguinPower

(2): Ranger, MURDERCAT

SirCakez

(1): drmyshottyizsik

MURDERCAT

(1): podoboq

podoboq

(1): Aneninen

Not Voting

(0):

None.

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline

: (expired on 2016-07-02 13:00:24)

tfw only actual vote on this slot is by someone who i didn't even know was in the game

In post 257, DixC wrote:

In post 232, Ranger wrote:

Murdercat wrote:I implied it might be because Ranger can be lazy as scum (my experience with her suggests this is the case).

Lazy is literally my playstyle.

Where do you think I got into the habit of posting nothing but readslists in the first place?

SirCakez wrote:Why do I feel like you're barely doing anything here?

Because I'm barely doing anything here?

DixC wrote:Ranger, comparing post rates and updates I see a significant difference in this game: what are some queries that might help you out here?

Mostly, talking to others. I suppose talking to me is not without benefits, but I can't think of anything. Like I said, largely reactionary.
{karnos, Aneninen}
{SirCakez}
{Smithereens, shotty, Chip Butty, Murdercat}
{DixC}
{Maruchan, Transcend}
{podoboq, PenguinPower}

Scum read: too lazy to do work but so not-lazy that you'll work on telling people that you're lazy? Also preternatural lack of lazy basis for good outcomes... crazy, yes, lazy, no.

Town Read:Not concerned enough with my question to actually answer it. Has podoboq at bottom of the list.

In post 215, Aneninen wrote:

In post 25, karnos wrote:On the one hand, this game is off to a very slow start.
On the other hand, I'm curious to see how ranger's read lists look with such a small sample of posts to read from.

Whut?
As the first post on Page2?

Maruchan's 27 is forced. Scummy.
Murdercat has noticed it in 28. Good. Townish.

In post 41, drmyshottyizsik wrote:VOTE: karnos
game to slow? let's get a wagon rolling!

L-2

La wow! If Maruchan's scum, Shotty's scum too.

In post 55, Chip Butty wrote:

In post 54, podoboq wrote:

In post 53, Chip Butty wrote:

In post 52, podoboq wrote:and an inconsistency worth owning up to.

Hate to be that guy, man, but that looks an awful lot like coaching.

No, I'm saying that he should have owned up to it. He didn't. He defended the inconsistency, and it's the fact that he didn't own up to it that's a problem.

WTF? I made the point about taking pressure of in #50. #51 was unrelated, from Karnos. And that quote I said could have been coaching was in #52. Shooty didn't reply at all to #50, but you say he defended the inconsistency??? That's BS, pure and simple.
Now you are definitely on my scumdar.

Parrot Bebop.

Podoboq seems to be flailing, eg. 56.

In post 66, Ranger wrote:{karnos}
{SirCakez}
{Aneninen, Murdercat, Smithereens}
{Chip Butty, shotty}
{Maruchan, DicX, PenguinPower, Transcend}
{podoboq}

Ranger's town again. Good to know.

scum read: is scum if maruchan and shorty are scum
town read: is not scum if Ranger is scum

In post 178, podoboq wrote:OK, so Maru is basically obv town to me. If you don't understand why, try treading what he posts. If it still doesn't make sense to you, slap yourself in the face three times, then ask me why, and I'll spell out for you how Maru is being the most supportive of pro-town play and showing the most opposition toward people who are showing anti-town play.

Scum read: is scum
Town read: is scum

Why aren't you voting for the only person you have listed as definitive scum, and voting for someone who is only potential in your view?

Ranger is almost certainly town, IMO.

Can't say I'm enjoying your level of confidence.

Can't say I'm enjoying your ISO.

Let's wagon here, the Ranger votes are terrible.

VOTE: Smithereens

Prodge. Sorry, had a bad headache most of yesterday, plus busy and generally wasn't in the mood for Mafia. Think I only posted (minimally) in two of my games. I'm getting a Townish feel from Dix. Given the level of interest in podo from Penguin, Ranger, Anen, and my own earlier suspicions, will have to look at him again. And, finally, survey the rest of the field. Have been a bit slack in this game because it has been moving so slowly. More later.

In post 268, MURDERCAT wrote:Can't say I'm enjoying your ISO.

I am enjoying your deflection... or your attempt to double-deflect against Smith... blatant.

^Penguin: I don't like to jump around a lot, kills tell a lot. For some people a "lean scum" is actually a way of saying "I am going to pretend that I think you are scum because I am sure you are not scum and if I pretend I think you are you are less likely to be killed at night as scum will think that the village will just kill you anyway". Which I believe is what is called "second level" play: and if i'm reading this forum right, they simply short hand it "L2" (though that could mean something else?).

Personally I spend all day playing l3 with myself; so there's that.

(4): karnos, SirCakez, Transcend, MURDERCAT
(3): DixC, Maruchan, podoboq
(2): Smithereens, Chip Butty
(2): Aneninen, PenguinPower
(1): drmyshottyizsik
(1): Ranger

(0):

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

: (expired on 2016-07-02 12:59:39)

I think I see what ranger is trying to do, and because of that I am leaving my vote right where it is.

VOTE: Smithereens
Still happy with this.