Mafiascum.net

In post 199, Eggman wrote:I just realized I forgot that ending. Thanks Creature
What I was going to say was, F-oh-ex, Robb, and Dragon were the only ones to respond to my question.

Is there a point to this?

In post 199, Eggman wrote: On 188, I wanted to make a post to show I was reading, but I wasn't really sure what to say, so. Uh..

But you weren't reading? Mario answered your question in 188 three hours before you posted it here. What do you think of that post, and do you have any scumreads?

In post 247, Smithereens wrote:the fuck are you talking to?

I'm assuming he was confused by this.

In post 241, Smithereens wrote:I'll catch up later, can't vote

atm

-------

As clarified by his post after that, that was just an acronym for "at the moment" and not some code or attempt at buddying.
I'd say MM is fine in my eyes, as while he hasn't talked up much I can't see many serious holes in his logic.

For the scumreads, I'm leaning towards Derek (reasons pointed out in 248) and stelo (he was here at some point, why hasn't he shown up?)
I'd put Robb and Smithereens at low null, because of gut feelings. Can't really make a read off of those.

In post 252, Eggman wrote: For the scumreads, I'm leaning towards Derek (reasons pointed out in 248) and stelo (he was here at some point, why hasn't he shown up?)
I'd put Robb and Smithereens at low null, because of gut feelings. Can't really make a read off of those.

Uhh could you expand on these a bit more? Your scumreads are either sheeping or completly unsubstantiated. Could you also explain why you consider stelo's flaking to be scummy? I'm not seeing how it's alignment indicative.

In post 249, Derek12 wrote:VOTE: crazycrabman

I'm not liking crazy's ISO right now. I'm excluding his first post since it's just a declaration that he's going to read through he game.

101 - Pretty pointless question to atm.

172 - Sheeping Creature

I have no idea what sheeping is and nobody answered my question of what it is.

In post 249, Derek12 wrote: 174 - He calls Smithereen's first two posts scummy. but is reluctant to scum read him for it.

Yeah, I'm reluctant to scum read Smithereen on two posts that he made. Two posts is not enough to judge anyone on.

In post 249, Derek12 wrote: 205 + 211 - Like before, calls Eggman's posts "funny" but is reluctant to scumread him. Gives Eggman a pass for not actively scumhunting because he isn't either?

Again, I'm not going to throw my vote around for a few comments. With thirteen people in the game, there's a high probability to mislynch.
Yeah, I give Eggman a pass for not actively scumhunting because life happens and you can't be at your computer all the time.

In post 249, Derek12 wrote: Other then his Creature town read, I don't really see any instances of him trying to figure the game out or scum hunt. What little suspicion he's placed on people is also quite non-committal. I want crazycrabman to give us his scumreads.

I agree, I will not commit to a random suspicion I have. That said, I don't have a read on anybody that I'm willing to lynch right now. I do have a suspicion of eggman, but I won't throw my vote out at him for it.

Sheeping is following someone's opinion.

In post 255, Creature wrote:Sheeping is following someone's opinion.

OK, Thanks!

VOTE: Eggman
Can we go back to this?
We have a ton of one or two person wagons we need to form real wagons to get going. I dont recall anyone townreading eggman and I have seen peope scumreading him so why not this wagon?

F-oh-ex

stelo

MarioManiac4

Creature

/

Dragon of the West

/

Smithereens

/

Dwlee99

Robbnva

Derek12

atm487

Eggman

There are 13 active players.
Absolute majority is .
Majority has been reached.

Previous vote count
Next vote count



Deadline is ((expired on 2016-07-07 00:00:00)).

has been prodded.

UNVOTE: stelo

Not sure about eggman, I'll ISO him and lynch if I find him scummy enough. Atm not liking Creature and derek12. Crab rubs me wrong a little.

In post 247, Smithereens wrote:the fuck are you talking to?

you

ok, I have decided
VOTE: Eggman
So far eggman has defended himself, but then shited blame to someone else. For example, he would, in one post, address all the claims against him with little defense, but insteadm address heavily why someone like Dwlee in scum or how someone else is suspicous. So this is why i am voting for him.

L-2 @Eggman

dank

kand

????

I'd try to scumhunt, but a. I'm not aware of the methods to do so and b. I don't see anything to go off of. So let me respond to Derek's post.
quote="In post 253, Derek12"]

In post 252, Eggman wrote: For the scumreads, I'm leaning towards Derek (reasons pointed out in 248) and stelo (he was here at some point, why hasn't he shown up?)
I'd put Robb and Smithereens at low null, because of gut feelings. Can't really make a read off of those.

Uhh could you expand on these a bit more? Your scumreads are either sheeping or completly unsubstantiated. Could you also explain why you consider stelo's flaking to be scummy? I'm not seeing how it's alignment indicative.[/quote]
: It felt to me like you were restating Dwlee's opinions and joking around with him. Sorta read like buddying.
: IMO, inactivity is a scumtell.
: To me, at least, it feels like he's taking a negative attitude with this game. Also, while we're on the topic:

In post 239, Smithereens wrote:

In post 205, crazycrabman wrote:

In post 188, Eggman wrote:the question is not phrased to imply that he's looking for an answer so much as he wants to be seen asking it:
'How many scum are in this game?' is excusable sometimes.
'So you think the scumteam in a 13-player game would be three people?' Not really.

I don't like this post very much because I don't understand his logic over my question. I WAS looking for an answer there, although the intent seems to have not come across. Every mod can do things differently, as well, so I wouldn't know the exact ratio of a 13-player game, hence the question.
, I've thought about since the last post, and changed my mind about, simple as that. I'd put him in null now.

Dank

Also an expression frequently used by stoners and hippies for something of high quality.

That borritos was dank, man.
or... That borritos was the dankness

Source

In post 267, Eggman wrote:I'd try to scumhunt, but a. I'm not aware of the methods to do so

This is your fourth game on this site, is it not? Basic guides to scumhunting is something you read during your first game, wow.
>I would scumhunt but I don't know how to.
VOTE: Eggman

In post 267, Eggman wrote:

Derek

: It felt to me like you were restating Dwlee's opinions and joking around with him. Sorta read like buddying.

Stelo

: IMO, inactivity is a scumtell.

The "read" on Derek is blatant restatement of what I wrote earlier.
stelo AND Akigoku are both inactive to the point where they were prodded. They haven't spoken after the prod either. At this point I wouldn't call it "inactivity" but "not being part of the game and about to be replaced". Also, funny how you mentioned stelo but not Akigoku. Or MM4 who has whooping 3 posts.

Also, you yourself are fourth least active player in this game (counting Akigoku who hasn't made a post and stelo) and you call inactivity is a scumtell. Projection much?
"Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others."

claim time

Because I agreed with your opinion on him.
If somebody who hasn't spoken up very much is scum, then that's stelo, Aki, and MM4, and I townread (pronounced like the color) MM4 from his few posts.
Not projection, hypocrisy.
PEDIT: VT. It's why I did the RQS: "vanilla" ice cream

Did you.. crumb vt?

You never even said what your favorite one was, this doesnt make sense lol