Mafiascum.net

^@ss

In post 247, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:But seriously,

I will be treating my lover with the same (if not more) scrutiny.

Pedit: @inspector

Why do you keep repeating this?

What benefit is there to scum knowing in advance that a pt with you won't simply be a nice place to chat?

In post 239, Human Sequencer wrote:Scout, if you're here I wanna hear what you have to say about Jester and Shadow.

I think S_S hasn't done that much yet, but he's posting content? Also, I don't see the scumslip, really. It's logic, although the flipside of the medal is also odd (pairing the IC with scum).
I'd say townlean.

thejester has less content with way more posts but the both of us were joking so it doesn't really matter. Overall a town tone.

Now, why cherrypick me out of all people?

@ser arthur: I think that, if you want to be the only person asking questions, you chose the wrong date.

In post 251, Cerberus v666 wrote:

In post 247, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:But seriously,

I will be treating my lover with the same (if not more) scrutiny.

Pedit: @inspector

Why do you keep repeating this?

What benefit is there to scum knowing in advance that a pt with you won't simply be a nice place to chat?

Because I'm ultimately trying to dodge pairing with a scum?

What the fuck obv my end goal is to match with a townie so it's easier to win. And I will destroy scum if they're in a PT with me so there's that.

In post 212, Shadow_step wrote:And why do you wanna pair up with nahdia and get killed during intermission?

This is the scumslip right?

It's...not really a scumslip? It's as bad as the argument you're lambasting HS for making, really.

There's no display of knowledge, no certainty. I already said that the person who pairs with Nahdia will die during the intermission, so the groundwork was laid, in thread, for him to pose that question to me in that fashion. He's essentially saying "Okay, I see you believe this. WHY would you put yourself into that situation, if you truly believe it?"

In post 253, inspectorscout wrote:@ser arthur: I think that, if you want to be the only person asking questions, you chose the wrong date.

OH BABY

I will be giving as much as I'm taking.

@scout because your ISO is full of nothing but setup spec, calling setup spec silly and jokes.
How do you possibly get SS as a townlean?
How do you possibly get Jester as town?
I wouldn't mind more actual content behind those reads, you're looking a little empty on the reasoning here.

In post 254, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:

In post 251, Cerberus v666 wrote:

In post 247, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:But seriously,

I will be treating my lover with the same (if not more) scrutiny.

Pedit: @inspector

Why do you keep repeating this?

What benefit is there to scum knowing in advance that a pt with you won't simply be a nice place to chat?

Because I'm ultimately trying to dodge pairing with a scum?

What the fuck obv my end goal is to match with a townie so it's easier to win. And I will destroy scum if they're in a PT with me so there's that.

Why are you trying to dodge pairing with a scum? If you'll destroy them in a PT, it's much more beneficial to town if you pair with scum, lead them on until lylo, and then simply remove them and give us the win.

In post 257, Human Sequencer wrote:@scout because your ISO is full of nothing but setup spec, calling setup spec silly and jokes.
How do you possibly get SS as a townlean?
How do you possibly get Jester as town?
I wouldn't mind more actual content behind those reads, you're looking a little empty on the reasoning here.

and how do you expect me to give content behind reads when the content given is setup spec and silly jokes?

In post 249, Human Sequencer wrote:Hey, you actually decided to respond! Look at that, did your scumbuddies in the scum PT tell you to do that?
Tell Jester to come out of there and start posting for me, I know she likes hiding from people who are scumreading her but this is just silly!

Ofc they did

In post 258, Cerberus v666 wrote: Why are you trying to dodge pairing with a scum? If you'll destroy them in a PT, it's much more beneficial to town if you pair with scum, lead them on until lylo, and then simply remove them and give us the win.

Nope, I think removing/suiciding is extremely anti-town.

I'm not confident in my reads enough to remove myself.

HOWEVER, I do want a bloc where I can coordinate pushes so I can get better pressure on people etc, and I can do that better with someone who I think is townie.

In post 259, inspectorscout wrote:

Ser Arthur Dayne, I accept your request. Let's begin our danse macabre until our undying love is seperated by scarlet blood.

That's unfortunate.

pedit: I agree that the removing thing is...generally bad play. However, you're essentially removing a tool from your box, as it were, by deliberately making it less likely scum will pair with you. Your town bloc argumetn? That's one slot. You'll need a lot more, and that one slot isn't going to make or break things in any way. I think this might just be a play style difference though, where we each value things differently, so the way that you're going about things seems contrary to your expressed goals to me, but it's perfectly reasonable to you.

In post 259, inspectorscout wrote:

Ser Arthur Dayne, I accept your request. Let's begin our danse macabre until our undying love is seperated by scarlet blood.

BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD

SKULLS FOR THE THRONE OF KHORNE.

@scout Hey, I'll show you how to do it. It's not tough, really.
146 is a supermassive black hole of scumminess. This is a clear, obvious, BLINDING display of shitty scum distancing, combined with the fact that Jester has completely fallen out of the thread since I've been deathtunnelling her makes me feel like I'm probably on to something.

Do you have any of these reads about any of the other players?
I do feel like you're kinda town, but I don't want to set a precedent of 'Yeah guys you can totally just sit back and lurk the whole game, putting in empty jokes every now and then!'

HS stop using activity as a fucking indicator of anything. I'm at work not being able to keep up with such volume of posting with the little time I have right now. I post when I decide it's time, if you think you'll get towncred for calling me out then you're wrong. Right now it looks like you're spamming for the sake of it.
And I'm not a "her", fuck off.

In post 263, Cerberus v666 wrote:pedit: I agree that the removing thing is...generally bad play. However, you're essentially removing a tool from your box, as it were, by deliberately making it less likely scum will pair with you. Your town bloc argumetn? That's one slot.

Well it's doubling the pushes, etc, so puts A LOT more pressure on people.

Now it is mostly a playstyle thing, but I did try to use my abrasive playstyle to dodge getting matched with a scum. I think scum are less likely to pair with me if they think I will be even more interrogating towards them, when they can coast easily with another lover.

Jester is confirmed scum.
There's no way Jester could know that I was posting about her activity and using it as leverage for a scumread if she really couldn't keep up with the thread like she says. Much more likely is that her scumbuddies told her about it.
I am very convinced on this.

Also, I'm sorry I mistook your gender, but I don't think you should be getting so annoyed over this. Even if we're both town, this is just a game.

In post 255, Cerberus v666 wrote:This is the scumslip right?

It's...not really a scumslip? It's as bad as the argument you're lambasting HS for making, really.

There's no display of knowledge, no certainty

. I already said that the person who pairs with Nahdia will die during the intermission, so the groundwork was laid, in thread, for him to pose that question to me in that fashion. He's essentially saying "Okay, I see you believe this. WHY would you put yourself into that situation, if you truly believe it?"

y'all really need to learn to see implications in posting.
he didn't outright state it but it's so heavily implied that it's hard to miss

DUDE, I'M FOLLOWING THE THREAD MORE OR LESS BUT I DON'T HAVE TIME TO ANALYSE EVERY POST AND WRITE MEANINGFUL OBSERVATIONS AND SHIT SO I REFRAIN FROM POSTING UNTIL I DO

In post 266, The_Jester wrote:HS stop using activity as a fucking indicator of anything.

gonna agree with this by the way, half the thread hasn't even shown up yet lol

@Everyone: Care to share your thoughts on HS? They're the slot I feel should be most readable at this point.

pedit: @Parama: You mean we all need to learn to wear our tinfoil hats and jump at every shadow?(yes, that was deliberate, I'm so sorry)

if you take everything literally you're not gonna find scum

Seems like Jester is a little annoyed that they got caught as scum for the wrong reason, unfortunately.