Mafiascum.net

Kingmaker failed to respond to a prod and will be replaced.

In post 207, Randomnamechange wrote:VOTE: 1svt
this does not feel like town 1svt. if it was i would be more willing to follow their push.

Do we have expereince together?

In post 211, Randomnamechange wrote:thats what im comparing 1svt's play to here.

So you are using meta from one game which was a bastard game?
Great, I'll avoid your opinion this game.

In post 223, WhyMafia wrote:Anyways, bc of deadline, I'll go VOTE: RandomMidget for now, but wanna pressure up 1SVT tomorrow

Why can't you pressure me today still? Your vote isn't the only form of pressure.
Why is Random scum here rather than just being, well, Random?

In post 225, Randomnamechange wrote:my scumread on him continued to develop after i voted him.

How can it continue to develop if I'm not posting?

In post 228, Randomnamechange wrote:

In post 28, Tucker Carlson wrote:Whoever puts Lucky2u at L-1 is towncleared for the day.

this was scummy from tucker

Scum motive for it?

In post 237, Lucky2u wrote:I'm still pretty ok with my vote, and I'm ignoring the double miller game until day 2.

So what happens day 2?
Do you think Miller claims should survive until late into the game?

In post 239, Randomnamechange wrote:ya i agree
also whymafia has been towning it up
VOTE: lucky2u
deadlines coming up and just in case 1svt is town i wouldnt mind giving them another day to show it

Explain how WhyMafia has been towning this up.
Given that you enjoy the meta read, wouldn't you suggest this is different to his town game?

In post 248, RadiantCowbells wrote:Alright fuck it sheep me

VOTE: Cookiedotjay

Sheep god-emperor cowbells. This shit flips scum.

Okay, can you give more of a reason to why?

I actually like them as town. Given that they share a different opinion than me on the millers, doesn't mean that they are scum for it or have scum motivation.
If both Millers are town (unlikely, and needs to be sorted sooner than later) then scum Cookie wouldn't be taking light from there but instead fueling the fire.

Unless of course, your argument here is that scum is in the Miller and it's a defence there, where then I point to you, that you should follow me.

In post 194, iDanyboy wrote:Yes, so what do we lose by letting him live a day?

Day 2 we normally have more information than day 1. You are suggesting that we basically policy lynch day 2 rather than day 1, when day 1 we are in blind.

I also do not expect that town will lynch here with only 1 kill, given that so many claims can be the reason for the no kill, and when put as an argument, people will ignore where to lynch.

Games with 2 miller claims should always be priority to lynch a Miller day 1 imo.

In post 253, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:

In post 223, WhyMafia wrote:Anyways, bc of deadline, I'll go VOTE: RandomMidget for now, but wanna pressure up 1SVT tomorrow

Why can't you pressure me today still? Your vote isn't the only form of pressure.
Why is Random scum here rather than just being, well, Random?

Because I'll be a lot busier this week with a last minute rush in summer homework and shopping

Basically it's a heavy gut read + what idanyboy has said. Just feels off.
From your latest posts:

In post 252, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:

In post 211, Randomnamechange wrote:thats what im comparing 1svt's play to here.

So you are using meta from one game which was a bastard game?
Great, I'll avoid your opinion this game.

Scummy. Completely tuning him out is something scum would say.

In post 256, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:

In post 237, Lucky2u wrote:I'm still pretty ok with my vote, and I'm ignoring the double miller game until day 2.

So what happens day 2?
Do you think Miller claims should survive until late into the game?

When I find that a miller is scummy that's when I'll persue it. Right now I find you and random scummy.

In post 248, RadiantCowbells wrote:Alright fuck it sheep me

VOTE: Cookiedotjay

Sheep god-emperor cowbells. This shit flips scum.

Can you tell me why plz me confused

In post 254, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:

In post 225, Randomnamechange wrote:my scumread on him continued to develop after i voted him.

How can it continue to develop if I'm not posting?

that was about tucker not you.

In post 257, 1 Shot Vanilla Town wrote:

In post 239, Randomnamechange wrote:ya i agree
also whymafia has been towning it up
VOTE: lucky2u
deadlines coming up and just in case 1svt is town i wouldnt mind giving them another day to show it

Explain how WhyMafia has been towning this up.
Given that you enjoy the meta read, wouldn't you suggest this is different to his town game?

why mafia's push on you was solid. i havent played with him before.

Deadline: (expired on 2017-08-26 21:02:02)

VC 1.05

Nazeebo
beeboy
Lucky2u, esires, iDanyBoy, WhyMafia
TwoInAMillion, 1 Shot Vanilla Town
randomidget
RadiantCowbells

Not Voting: Kingmaker, Tarkus, CookieDotJay

With votes, to lynch

Tucker Carlson is being replaced cos banhammer

Chikadee replaces kingmaker.
2 days added to deadline.

I'm on page 7 y'all

I'm all caught up...but like....the eclipse is happening soon.

So

cuhrayzee weekend, I'll catch up tonight

Oh and welcome chickadee

In post 109, CookieDotJay wrote:As someone who once replaced into an unclaimed miller slot in a game with 2 millers, I'm gonna suggest we let them place each other while we get on with the rest of the standard day 1 antics, then revisit them later when they have more developed opinions on each other.

Oh and also
VOTE: Radiant Cowbells

-jj

No Lynch jjh before he votes Titus

In post 166, Shawn and Gus wrote:

In post 164, Nazeebo wrote: My problem is that he immediately tries to look for reasons why TwoInAMillion could be scum instead of looking for reasons why he could be town. It has a feel of "oh shit I got caught, I better try and get out of this somehow"

You could say that about TIAM too though or any scum read. Are you getting that feel from this post alone or is it a combination of his posts?

In post 154, CookieDotJay wrote:Fuck, actual bona-fide confirmation bias there probably means you're town. Like, that "line of reasoning" can only exist because you're so certain no logical person could disagree with you.
-jj

Confirmation bias is easy to fake and is not a town-tell. Could you also explain why you scum read him in the first place?

-Shawn

I think the reaction to the second miller claim feels off. I don't feel the same way about TIAM at all. How do you read the reaction then?

I will have computer access again before EOD just hold on

In post 168, Randomnamechange wrote:

In post 159, WhyMafia wrote:Why are you interested in pushing a claimed vigilante?

In post 160, WhyMafia wrote:Gut scum reading randomidget

Interesting transition

In post 162, Nazeebo wrote:

In post 145, Randomnamechange wrote:

In post 143, Nazeebo wrote:

In post 37, Randomnamechange wrote:then i dont rly think anything can be read so far.
so far im townreading lucky and kingmaker and scumreading tucker.
VOTE: tucker

want to explain these? I got nothing up till now.

Edit: okay I got lucky and king from reading newer posts. Why did you originally scumread tucker though?

I didn't like his reaction to Lucky's vote. felt like they were worried pressure there would dissolve and wanted to keep it up. combined with a lucky townread this makes me think they were trying to avoid attention falling onto their team.

you mean Lucky voting RC? I'm confused

I meant joke not vote sorry

didn't lucky's joke happen after Tucker's vote?
Sorry this is really old but I do think it's an interesting fact.