Mafiascum.net

Page 10*

In post 248, Almost50 wrote:Id you genuinely believe so then Edo's vote in me (to put make my wagon tied with Osuka's) should give you a bit of a pause.

You think Osuka is town then due to:

In post 247, Almost50 wrote:B) You're Scum who want to make sure the two competing wagons are on town, so if one collapses the other gets pushed further.

In post 246, Golden Robster wrote:

In post 245, texcat wrote:But what about Myloninja? He doesn't get a tr?

Probably just a passing comment and not her full reads; texcat, why are you voting osuka?

Why are you voting Osuka? I had an explanation in my vote post.

In post 236, Golden Robster wrote:VOTE: Osuka

since wavemode isn't engaging me

Okay then, am I supposed to engage you?

In post 236, Golden Robster wrote:VOTE: Osuka

since wavemode isn't engaging me

In post 239, Golden Robster wrote:

In post 229, osuka wrote:what in the fuck

What's wrong with @AA9 #223?

The way it’s phrased is very artificial and then it does a 180, badly misreps rampages post and accuses him of picking on creature

In post 254, osuka wrote:badly misreps rampages post

How does it misrep rampage's post?

Hello everyone. Sorry I haven't been here. From what I read so far, I think hopkirk is town.

In post 210, Lalendra wrote:This is very unlike your tone in other games we've played and I'm not sure if you're just trying something new or if you're really as scummy as you're making yourself sound, and that's almost impossible to believe but as of yet I have no other explanation

I think Lalendra is town

Ausuka's iso looks like IIOA scum but I misread her last game. So idk.

In post 84, Edosurist wrote:

In post 79, texcat wrote:

In post 77, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: osuka

Scummiest vibe.

I agree. It wasn't just the post that Pine pointed out. I thought the role cop claim smelled like old fish.

VOTE: OOOsuka

That's a good one.
VOTE: textcat

In post 222, Edosurist wrote:

In post 143, Kublai Khan wrote:

In post 142, Almost50 wrote:

In post 141, Kublai Khan wrote:

In post 129, Ausuka wrote:

In post 128, Kublai Khan wrote:Huh. Second time Ausuka is mentioning a traitor.

Yep, and I've explained why I believe there is a traitor. Do you actually scumread me for this?

If you were a traitor and wanted to flag to your team who you are, then bringing up the possibility of a traitor apropos of nothing is a pretty good beacon.

If that's true then dueling on it persistently is another way of signaling it to your team.

*low whistle*

Not bad.
- Unprompted chainsaw defending
- "No, you!"
- Lying ("persistently")

I was voting your for the stupid BS stuff you were doing earlier, you could have ridden that out. But now you are super number 1 scum with a bullet.

I'm gonna follow Khan here.
VOTE: Almost50

I don't like these

VOTE: edo

In post 249, Golden Robster wrote:1. Pressuring you with a wagon since he's unsatisfied with how you're acting weird d1.
2. Putting a vote on you because he feels it's the best place currently.
3. Just voting you because he gets scum vibes from you?

1- "More votes on this please".
2- "I think that's the best place to vote right now".
3- "I'm getting scummy vibes from this dude".

See? You're not getting the point. I'm not SRing him for voting me (otherwise I'd be SRing everyone who voted or expressed will to vote me, which isn;t the case). Ny problem is with his stated reasoning of someone else, thus absolving himself from any wrongdoing aftermath.

In post 250, Golden Robster wrote:Page 10*

In post 248, Almost50 wrote:Id you genuinely believe so then Edo's vote in me (to put make my wagon tied with Osuka's) should give you a bit of a pause.

You think Osuka is town then due to:

In post 247, Almost50 wrote:B) You're Scum who want to make sure the two competing wagons are on town, so if one collapses the other gets pushed further.

OR SCUM due to:

In post 247, Almost50 wrote:A) You're Scum with the player who has the largest wagon on them.

Why'd you leave that out??

In post 260, Almost50 wrote:Ny problem is with his stated reasoning of sheeping someone else, thus absolving himself from any wrongdoing aftermath.

There's no "absolving of wrongdoing aftermath" because you haven't flipped yet so why you acting like his motivation is scummy

In post 253, osuka wrote:Okay then, am I supposed to engage you?

Why is JJD giving you newbscum vibes btw?

In post 252, texcat wrote:Why are you voting Osuka? I had an explanation in my vote post.

Yeah, your reasoning was that his opening post about claiming rolecop smelt like old fish. Not sure what that means but care to comment because if anything, it feels like a shitty reason?

I explained earlier that I wanted to engage him since reads in RVS are usually bad.

In post 262, Golden Robster wrote:

In post 260, Almost50 wrote:Ny problem is with his stated reasoning of sheeping someone else, thus absolving himself from any wrongdoing aftermath.

There's no "absolving of wrongdoing aftermath" because you haven't flipped yet so why you acting like his motivation is scummy

Because I can't wait to make my case after I join the dead thread?? Scum hunting is looking into posts and actions and trying to determine if it's town or scum motivated. Is it not?

I mean really! "you haven't flipped yet"??? You mean I should wait till I'm flipped to make a case based on someone's vote reasoning?? COME ON!

And you haven't responded to the second part: Why assume I have a TR on Osuka but not a SR when I included BOTH possibilities in the same post?

In post 265, Almost50 wrote:Because I can't wait to make my case after I join the dead thread?? Scum hunting is looking into posts and actions and trying to determine if it's town or scum motivated. Is it not?

Yes but I don't understand how you can call someone scum when they have little to zero content; to me it feels like you're trying to explain a shitty vote with complex reasoning too early on?

It's not even complex reasoning it just feels unjustified and kind of like bad reasoning

In post 267, Almost50 wrote:And you haven't responded to the second part: Why assume I have a TR on Osuka but not a SR when I included BOTH possibilities in the same post?

In post 97, Almost50 wrote:16. Osuka+ (Leaning town. Claiming Scum as scum is too bold a move for him)

In post 105, Almost50 wrote:

In post 102, osuka wrote:almost that might be the shittiest attempt at a game starting post I’ve ever seen, I’m sorry

it’s like you’re trying to grasp at straws when, actually, there are no straws

So you disagree with my TR on you?? GOOD. Replace yourself with one of my proposed scumsters.

?

Fine. We will see. I'm fine with the day being me vs him for the lynch. An unofficial gladiator shot here. Vote one of us.

P-edit: EVERYONE knows (and a few explicitly said) that post #97 was a JOKEY ENTRANCE. Do I TR Pine "because he sounded town when he typed .confirm"??

It thus follows that #105 is a sarcastic response to Osuka taking my early reads too seriously.

Now if you look closer (back to #97 you'd see I only had ONE serious read (on Hopkirk). Why else would I state -within the post.. between brackets- it was a serious read if all other reads were also serious???

In post 271, Almost50 wrote:I'm fine with the day being me vs him for the lynch. An unofficial gladiator shot here. Vote one of us.

this is what I'm talking about, your SR feels unjustified and then you take it to the extreme just like how you've been acting over the top in RVS

Charles can be town.

In post 125, Ausuka wrote:

In post 117, Hopkirk wrote:

In post 104, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: Creature

I'm fine with this vote.

Interested in hearing more.

He's Creature. He's not interested. His response to the wagon will be easily sortable. His flip could either support or disprove the Almost theory. What more evidence is needed?

If the almost thing is false jarjar is still scummy btw.

-Sortable after a few days- yeah I've heard this.
-Voting him immediately then saying 'oh it's fake' when he posts.
-Better method would be leave it a few days without interacting with him and then decide. Putting a wagon on him is more likely to make it sound fake.

In post 152, Almost50 wrote:

In post 143, Kublai Khan wrote:I was voting your for the stupid BS stuff you were doing earlier, you could have ridden that out. But now you are super number 1 scum with a bullet.

I think you can do better than "stupid BS". How about "low life SoB"? Like, I started the game with the intention to have fin,. and I'm not gonna let a #@$% like you ruin that for me, so you are on my ignore list already. Over and out.

Stop TvTing.

In post 164, TheRampage wrote:I get that Texcat, but why sign up to play when you knew you had those coming down the pipe?

In post 165, texcat wrote:Good question.

Is it? Didn't sound like weeks of stuff, sounded like days of stuff in a month long game. Ramp fine, Tex minor dislike.

In post 178, Golden Robster wrote:Just some thoughts while I skimmed through; am not taking any of what I write seriously at this point but just want to put content on the table:

In post 47, Pine wrote:I plan on active lurking through D1 at least. This is a very large game, and my reads are traditionally sub-random in crowded D1s.

Can you explain what sub-random reads means?

In post 53, Pine wrote:

In post 52, osuka wrote:How about this, nobody posts anything d1 and we don’t Lynch in case we end up voting a townie

Then we convince the mafia not to kill anyone and we call it a draw

I'm going to call an early SR on this. Some kind of combination of LAMIST and "haha let's do this anti-Town thing as a joke but no really."

You know, I kind of agree with this; not the lamist part but the jokes. It's RVS and it's the phase where people are making jokes and trolling but 52 just feels slightly, if not, a tiny bit forced.

Don't SR this post though because RVS is just an edgy phase in general; don't know many players here and SR'ing due to playstyle in RVS is stupid.

In post 179, Golden Robster wrote:

In post 95, osuka wrote:i mean what they say will vary, but I generally get called out as being scummy very early in the game by at least some of the players. Usually during rvs

A50 and his reads list is actually pretty fcking towny and am liking him as town already; not the reads but the effort he put in to make a pile of collective crap in one post. Don't think scum would put this much effort into something so early on just to draw attention to themselves unless scum A50 has balls of steel.

In post 102, osuka wrote:almost that might be the shittiest attempt at a game starting post I’ve ever seen, I’m sorry

it’s like you’re trying to grasp at straws when, actually, there are no straws

It's RVS; your attempt at jokes seems forced and you're acting like his reads list is serious.

Don't understand?

This is scum.