Mafiascum.net

VOTE: Flubbernugget

Wouldn't surprise me at all if {profii, inferno, gustavo} is all-town. Last two have tunnely playstyles but yeah that's NAI. Still suspect skygazer but this is good too.

Also brassherald is town.

In post 248, Gustavo wrote:

In post 242, brassherald wrote:

In post 239, Gustavo wrote:

In post 237, profii wrote:Gus called me iioa - I dunno what that means

Refer to post 236. Classic example. You make wordy posts to appear like you are doing something but when I reach the end I don’t see you actually doing anything

Use post tags, it's really not that hard.

For me it is. So I’d appreciate if you just accept that going forward. Thank you

How is this hard?

How do you not understand how to do post tags?

You type in the number of the post, you can highlight it and press the post button, it's the very last button on the tabs on top.

I am not accepting that, and I am going to tell you conclusively, that it makes your posts easier to read if you use post tags, rather than just mentioning the number. There is no reason you should be unable to use the post tags.

I apologize for losing my chill here.

In post 248, Gustavo wrote:

In post 242, brassherald wrote:

In post 239, Gustavo wrote:

In post 237, profii wrote:Gus called me iioa - I dunno what that means

Refer to post 236. Classic example. You make wordy posts to appear like you are doing something but when I reach the end I don’t see you actually doing anything

Use post tags, it's really not that hard.

For me it is. So I’d appreciate if you just accept that going forward. Thank you

I did say in the post that I would analyse the wagon later. I see the vote count but it felt like there was other voters who may have moved. If not I’d be looking at those 3 currently voting for the scummiest but I haven’t had a chance to iso properly yet

So that is my analysis so far - scum likely to use this scenario to wagon Rask opportunistically - further analysis on specific voters to follow and my first serious vote to be placed

I think that constitutes something nearer analysis than info and I’d point out I’ve already said everything there but thanks for the feedback

In post 251, brassherald wrote:

In post 248, Gustavo wrote:

In post 242, brassherald wrote:

In post 239, Gustavo wrote:

In post 237, profii wrote:Gus called me iioa - I dunno what that means

Refer to post 236. Classic example. You make wordy posts to appear like you are doing something but when I reach the end I don’t see you actually doing anything

Use post tags, it's really not that hard.

For me it is. So I’d appreciate if you just accept that going forward. Thank you

How is this hard?

How do you not understand how to do post tags?

You type in the number of the post, you can highlight it and press the post button, it's the very last button on the tabs on top.

I am not accepting that, and I am going to tell you conclusively, that it makes your posts easier to read if you use post tags, rather than just mentioning the number. There is no reason you should be unable to use the post tags.

I apologize for losing my chill here.

That’s extra work especially since the post I was referring to was on the same page. I’m lazy. Sue me

In post 180, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 115, Skygazer wrote:Agreed. In my onion I think the first reaction test (elbirn) is fine but the second one (rask) a bit LAMIST especially considering he never really followed up on it other than his read on inferno.
VOTE: rask

I don't think rask has done anything shady but would still entertain him as scum coasting

Also this post counts as a term I liked in another game “political”

Ready for some “I told you so” after a flip but not committed to voting

I see why votes seem to be heading this way - I’ll be measuring this up against the other 3 players even though there is no vote as such

I’m done with Gus at this point, he’s confscum at this point for me. Elbirn’s post on me feels very strong. As for Rask’s motivation, I honestly think it was just RVS and he was messing around. Also, @Elbrin I had nothing against your self vote. It’s the responses that came after it that felt off. (Oh, and that wall post is nothing. I’ve seen way worse.)

I knew I liked you Ausuka!

@Brass, is constantly being on Mobile a good enough excuse for you?

In post 249, Gustavo wrote:

In post 244, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Why are all you peeps ignoring scumFlubber?

I mean voting Gus who has been a toxic jerk probably feels good but just because he is pompous and condescending doesn’t mean he is scum. Just that he’s a bad player in the wrong game.

This was completely unnecessary. I’d appreciate it if people please stop calling me toxic or a jerk or tbh any other sort of name calling. Let’s act like adults ok?

If you don’t want to be called toxic, then don’t be toxic. The fact that you are being called toxic by several people now should clue you in that despite your beliefs, you are being detrimental to this game and need to figure it out.

Thanks.

In post 258, Inferno390 wrote:@Brass, is constantly being on Mobile a good enough excuse for you?

Ehhh... I still do it on mobile, but at this point one person's already said it's going to be Anarchy.

I'm just going to go back to chill.

I'm Captain America levels of chill now.

Gus - obviously Inferno is scum reading you with vigour however do you think Inferno is scum/town/nai so far?

In post 256, Inferno390 wrote:I’m done with Gus at this point, he’s confscum at this point for me. Elbirn’s post on me feels very strong. As for Rask’s motivation, I honestly think it was just RVS and he was messing around. Also, @Elbrin I had nothing against your self vote. It’s the responses that came after it that felt off. (Oh, and that wall post is nothing. I’ve seen way worse.)

How exactly am I cofscum?

Cause I called you out on your lies or as you put it “misinterpretations”?

I’m not scum so if you aren’t either let’s have a conversation here. Are you even willing?

You say I’ve been evasive and I’ve said you can ask me questions so here is your chance.

In post 259, Inferno390 wrote:

In post 249, Gustavo wrote:

In post 244, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Why are all you peeps ignoring scumFlubber?

I mean voting Gus who has been a toxic jerk probably feels good but just because he is pompous and condescending doesn’t mean he is scum. Just that he’s a bad player in the wrong game.

This was completely unnecessary. I’d appreciate it if people please stop calling me toxic or a jerk or tbh any other sort of name calling. Let’s act like adults ok?

If you don’t want to be called toxic, then don’t be toxic. The fact that you are being called toxic by several people now should clue you in that despite your beliefs, you are being detrimental to this game and need to figure it out.

Thanks.

I don’t feel I have been. I haven’t done anything toxic at all. If anything you and magna are being toxic.

Just took a look at Flubbernugget ISO and ehhhhhh
I can see where the scumread is coming from.
I’d like a little more from the slot before I join the wagon though.

In post 262, profii wrote:Gus - obviously Inferno is scum reading you with vigour however do you think Inferno is scum/town/nai so far?

I’m leaving him at null because I’m biased by my anger of him calling me toxic and saying I’ve been evasive when I don’t feel I have, also because I feel he’s lied a couple of times and I don’t understand why he would as town but I don’t understand why he would as scum either.

VOTE: Flubbernugget

Not going to keep voting someone when I might just be upset at them. It's not chill.



Dancing to a new wagon.

I feel very baited but whatever.
@Gus: Here’s a question. What’s with the progression from 63 to 164?

In post 269, brassherald wrote:

@mod How many Marvel gifs am I allowed to post before it is too many for this game? I might be close to that already.

Also, I think that the definition of being evasive is something like “avoiding commitment by responding indirectly.” And responding to everything I say by saying I’m a liar is a a pretty good way of doing that, wouldn’t you agree?

In post 268, Inferno390 wrote:I feel very baited but whatever.
@Gus: Here’s a question. What’s with the progression from 63 to 164?

I believe you mean 83? That’s when I vote profli because I think he could be scum. Post 164 is me having a conversation with hws which implies I’m continuing to thinking he’s scum.

If there was a progression it was one from a light scum read to moderate scum read. I don’t see why any townie would think voting no lynch is playing against their win condition. That’s just throwing dirt on somebody unnecessarily. He also had an issue with the self vote which struck me as odd.

Can you explain why a no vote or a self vote can be pro town? (Particularly the self vote, I can see that a no vote might be a cop out of town can’t find scum but usually flips and odd number player lists are more useful imo)

In post 271, Inferno390 wrote:Also, I think that the definition of being evasive is something like “avoiding commitment by responding indirectly.” And responding to everything I say by saying I’m a liar is a a pretty good way of doing that, wouldn’t you agree?

I wasn’t avoiding commitment to anything though and I feel like if I see somebody lying, it’s more important to call that out immediately. You probably shouldn’t have lied. I get you don’t think you lied, but unfortunately you did.

It’s better not to make assumptions and posting them as fact.