Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:34 pm**

In post 248, Micc wrote:
Searching for a replacement for SargeAlpha.

Rip

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:35 pm**

since responding while reading seems to be the format ill do it too

In post 220, Eragon wrote:not the fact that its 2 random people, the fact that its 2 people with zero thread presence and that are noobs(if im not mistaken)

if thats not hella opportunistic idk what is

the point is that they have no thread presence so im wondering if they might be the scum team given that im getting townreads/leaning town on most other people

In post 224, Formerfish wrote:
In post 209, OkaPoka wrote:because my vote is not on anyone and at this point im just going to grasp at straws to find scum

i mean i could go ahead and drop a vote on flicker but other people seem to be pushing that so I might as well do other stuff in the meantime

this game feels way too slow for my taste, gotta shake things up somehow
Give me back town!Oka who wanders around like mister Magoo without his glasses ass ending his way into fiding scum on day 2/3. When are you aggressive early game?

i mean if you want to do a deep dive into my older games im pretty aggro early game calling for peoples heads 5 pages in, also get lynch for it half the time on d1 but what can you do
ill try and wander onto scum but usually my scumreads develop with interacting with others rather than seeing others interact with others
guess i like attention?

In post 225, Formerfish wrote:
In post 218, OkaPoka wrote:it's not the pagecount and number of posts that makes it slow its the lack of scumhunting and wagon forming which im at fault for but nonetheless its giving a slow impression
Lack of scum hunting? Its day 1 and we are on page, what, 8? We are still very much in the feeling each other out stage for anyone to have really strong feelings about wanting to hang anyone. Shit we can have hunches and we can have inklings, but if you are looking for a full blown case this early then you are scum and need to die.

Also, at you talking about the lack of wagons forming when you commented on not wanting to join the one on flicker and would rather do your own thing over there.

meh feels to me like a whole lot of chit chat and not a whole lot of your scum and you need to die. maybe chit chat helps people scumread? im kinda selfish and i cant scumread off of chit chat so i want to move the game out of the direction we are in.

i feel like if i join the flicker wagon id be basically saying have fun nancy and then dip out the thread, pushing an unique case helps me get in the game and develop scumreads based on interaction with others.

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:38 pm**

In post 227, Eragon wrote:
In post 226, nancy wrote:
In post 220, Eragon wrote:not the fact that its 2 random people, the fact that its 2 people with zero thread presence and that are noobs(if im not mistaken)

if thats not hella opportunistic idk what is
I guess, but like, he has some shape of a townread on everyone else, no?
so its just PoE then...

PoE D1???

i fucking hate poe but im lost so whatever

In post 228, Formerfish wrote:VOTE: Oka

Not into the aggro stance he is taking here. Not into the fact that he avoids a wagon while complaining about wagons not forming. This is not the town!Oka I know.

i mean its not that aggro but i guess you are entitled to your own opinion

In post 232, Eragon wrote:
In post 227, Eragon wrote:
In post 226, nancy wrote:
In post 220, Eragon wrote:not the fact that its 2 random people, the fact that its 2 people with zero thread presence and that are noobs(if im not mistaken)

if thats not hella opportunistic idk what is
I guess, but like, he has some shape of a townread on everyone else, no?
so its just PoE then...

PoE D1???
adding onto this,

If it truly is PoE, im truly amazed that ANYONE can have 7 solid enough townreads that they think that the 2 scum are the only people they dont townred

town: me, nancy, ff, eragon, trinity, stanley
null: sarge
leaning scum after some thought but don't need to push because others: flicker
scum: iceman

In post 235, nancy wrote:@Oka where'd you go my dude

sry

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:40 pm**

ebwop: when i label iceman as scum i mean ever so slightly scummy

okay i dont think anything else needs responding to

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:43 pm**

at this point im just waiting for the replacement to sarge to replace in and say something so i can vote them lol

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:44 pm**

In post 249, nancy wrote:
In post 246, Formerfish wrote:
In post 244, nancy wrote:Kinda want to wait until Flicker and stan have given their take on all this before I talk about my Oka read, would also be nice if Oka made a return to thread.
You are scoring more town points for this line of thinking with me by the way. Scum!nancy would just let me roll through town!Oka if that was what this was.
Wait, why can't I be scum with Oka lmao

I mean, I guess you could, but I already have a town read working for you, so that would kind of weird for me to put out there when I don't think you are scum.

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:48 pm**

In post 252, OkaPoka wrote:i mean its not that aggro but i guess you are entitled to your own opinion

When I compare it to the play that I know to be town from you based off our personal games it is much more aggressive. To be you usually make a bunch of self deprecating posts and talk about how you can't get a good hold of the game. Here its different, its like you just took a hit of lynch juice and you gotta let it out on someone now. Right now.

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:51 pm**

In post 254, OkaPoka wrote:at this point im just waiting for the replacement to sarge to replace in and say something so i can vote them lol

I am very ok with my vote after this post, and implore others to join me in this endeavor to introduce Oka to rope.

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:52 pm**

im town

AMA

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:55 pm**

also please ask me questions it helps me form reads on you

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 3:57 pm**

In post 208, Formerfish wrote:
In post 193, OkaPoka wrote:it feels like it was phrased in a way that allows iceman to build upon it later to attack nancy w/o really needing to build a legitimate in game case on her

like instead of saying something about nancy feels off, feels like she is controlling town he goes with the proposition that cannot really be argued against
So why is your first instinct to call him scum and vote him. Why wouldnt you talk to the newbie, dance if you will, so suss out his true machinations and intentions? Wouldn't that be a fantastic way to figure someone out? "Hey Iceman, could you explain this IC lynching business more?" Iceman: "Sure, here's a full explination." Oka: "Huh, I still have a question about blind lynching or if there will be cases?" Iceman: "I would look more closely at an IC alive on day 3, but if there was someone more likely to be scum, I would vote the other person and not the IC." Oka: "Ahhh... ok, I thought you were saying something different, my bad!"

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:00 pm**

uh because i want to throw my vote somewhere

yeah i guess i could have danced with him a bit but oops, probably would have been the better play

i just hoped throwing my vote down would get the ball rolling in a direction that was more clear and focused on scumhunting

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:03 pm**

Oka, talk to me about your FF townread?

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:04 pm**

I also feel there was a lot more that you skimmed over from my posting on your behavior here in the game. Like you are editing what you want to respond to and how you want to respond to it.

Ninja- Maybe im reading to much into it, but that first line seems sassy.

And yeah, a town thing to do is not to throw down a vote at the most minor of perceived slights and maybe actually just engage the guy first since it was over something you thought he was saying and not what he actually said.

Is your vote still on him now?

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:06 pm**

In post 157, IcemanCh wrote:UNVOTE:

I'm shocked that no one pointed out that FF was at L-2 from RVS. It took 2 pages?

So far I'm leaning Town on trinity. I've seen her scum game..... this game she feels more natural.

I don’t understand the big deal about being L-2. I thought L-1 was the important one, as then it just takes one more to lynch. Why would you be shocked?

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:07 pm**

What I like about oka is the hunting of separate leads and not just sheepping others reads. I always feel like I come across as scum when I just sheep and when other people do it it seems scummy. So can appreciate that view point and it gives oka town points.

What I dont like is the insistence that the game go fast. On this forum that is a super scum read for me.

I also dont like the lazy read. Picking on the people who haven't posted in the first bit of the game or snagging a weak straw seems scummy to me. It to easy to brush off a mislynch the next day as the fault of the lynchee for not being more involved.

Eventually we need to push lurkers and lynch them but I dont think we are there.

Oka do you think I'm wrong for feeling like rushing a game on D1 is scummy?

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:09 pm**

In post 264, TrinityNZ wrote:
In post 157, IcemanCh wrote:UNVOTE:

I'm shocked that no one pointed out that FF was at L-2 from RVS. It took 2 pages?

So far I'm leaning Town on trinity. I've seen her scum game..... this game she feels more natural.

I don’t understand the big deal about being L-2. I thought L-1 was the important one, as then it just takes one more to lynch. Why would you be shocked?

Maybe shocked is the wrong word. It's more an etiquette thing especially when its obvious that there wasn't supposed to be an actual wagon.

I'm not saying you did anything wrong. Just odd others didnt point it out.

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:10 pm**

FF is actively engaging with people. He is also going out of his way to correct things that are not directly relevant to him which makes me think he is town cuz if i were scum i wouldn't care about correcting things and just let people argue and have at it.

pedit @ff wdym? like im editing down what you are saying or im missing questions that you have?
UNVOTE:
not anymore
probs going to iso some people and see if there is a potential case
sometimes when you engage with people they don't know if you are scumreading them or not so i like to throw down a vote to show hey, i think you might be scum. but you do you man.

pedit2: nope, rushing games are scummy but i dont feel like i want to rush the game, i feel like the game is dragging but w/e

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:13 pm**

Iceman, who do you think Oka's insistence that the game go fast is scummy?

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:13 pm**

In post 213, Eragon wrote:well, even so we have plenty of time.

im used to 96 hour days(4 days RL) at the maximum and we have double that plus one day.

these daylengths feel abnormally long to me, but I know I have plenty of time

This was a HUGE adjustment for me at first. I was used to 48 hours.

The nights are the worst. 48 hours..... really? We do 24 or when all actions are received. Usually with 20 PRs sending in actions.

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:14 pm**

In post 267, OkaPoka wrote:FF is actively engaging with people. He is also going out of his way to correct things that are not directly relevant to him which makes me think he is town cuz if i were scum i wouldn't care about correcting things and just let people argue and have at it.

What stuff is he correcting?

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:15 pm**

In post 171, Formerfish wrote:
In post 134, nancy wrote:
In post 132, OkaPoka wrote:huh?
Your unvote is weird.
Why was it weird? He just pointed out that trinity voting brought me to l-2, and his vote was on me as well. Since his vote on me was in rvs and we are clearly out of it, it would make sense to move or at least remove a rvs vote which is currently the leading wagon based solely off of rvs votes.

maybe correct might be the wrong term

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:17 pm**

Oka you are insane if you think this game is dragging lmao

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:18 pm**

In post 271, OkaPoka wrote:
In post 171, Formerfish wrote:
In post 134, nancy wrote:
In post 132, OkaPoka wrote:huh?
Your unvote is weird.
Why was it weird? He just pointed out that trinity voting brought me to l-2, and his vote was on me as well. Since his vote on me was in rvs and we are clearly out of it, it would make sense to move or at least remove a rvs vote which is currently the leading wagon based solely off of rvs votes.
maybe correct might be the wrong term

Okay so, what is he doing that's town for you if not correcting?

Posted: **Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:19 pm**

In post 267, OkaPoka wrote: pedit @ff wdym? like im editing down what you are saying or im missing questions that you have?
UNVOTE:
not anymore
probs going to iso some people and see if there is a potential case
sometimes when you engage with people they don't know if you are scumreading them or not so i like to throw down a vote to show hey, i think you might be scum. but you do you man.

pedit2: nope, rushing games are scummy but i dont feel like i want to rush the game, i feel like the game is dragging but w/e

I feel like there was a slew of posts from me addressing your scumreading Ice based off the IC thing. I feel like you quoted like one of them to respond to. So it feels like you are cherry picking from my posts to respond to only the parts you want to. Generally this is something that I try to intentionally do, and I don't know if I mentioned it in our last game together. Its why I post the way that I do.

Mafiascum.net

Newbie 1881 - Game Over