Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2018 9:46 am
I'm reading men better than women. Maybe that's just the opposite gender thing.
HmmIn post 195, MariaR wrote:On one hand I'm happy that I have townreads
on the other I'm annoyed it's all ladies because the guys can't town tell to save there god dam life.
I think I like this questionIn post 208, MariaR wrote:Before I answer why did you ask me about gamma out of everyone.In post 203, Moment wrote:What's your read on Gamma Emerald?
Is it too early to volunteer as tribute?In post 92, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:by definition it'll create some TvT pairings but I think more importantly, it allows for us to put high trust targets with low trust targets. I also considered doing like 3 bad with bads for them to agree to die, but basically we need to have pairings where we can read them while also relying that there is a solid town person able to leave the dance if necessary.
... says the "Most Cunning Manipulator".In post 253, Malakittens wrote:@maria I obv town really quickly once I start posting actual solid serious content so
...In post 257, Brian Skies wrote:That discredit!
To be fair, I'm just jealous because I was hoping to use that against Mala later.
Why hmm?In post 251, Gamma Emerald wrote:HmmIn post 195, MariaR wrote:On one hand I'm happy that I have townreads
on the other I'm annoyed it's all ladies because the guys can't town tell to save there god dam life.
Moment engaging with the discussion and having a lot to say is very typical of town him, I'm going to treat him as easy to read because from my experience when he's scum you can pretty much tell and he doesn't get as involved, where town looks like this
ConvenientIn post 253, Malakittens wrote:@maria I obv town really quickly once I start posting actual solid serious content so
What type of content are you posting right now?In post 253, Malakittens wrote:@maria I obv town really quickly once I start posting actual solid serious content so
You weren't trying to make a point, you were trying to justify your early proposal to kokichi to himIn post 264, Sakura Hana wrote:I love how people keep helping me prove my point that i was making to RC.
100% sure that's not exactly how that conversation went, i justified my early vote to kokichi with my point which RC argued against and now you're helping me prove said point.In post 266, Dunnstral wrote:You weren't trying to make a point, you were trying to justify your early proposal to kokichi to himIn post 264, Sakura Hana wrote:I love how people keep helping me prove my point that i was making to RC.
In post 269, Dunnstral wrote:Why did you pick Kokichi?
In post 144, Sakura Hana wrote:I had decided that i'd do that since he in'd for this because he's a cool person i like playing with.
The only thing I agree with you on is the bolded part.In post 140, Moment wrote:Implicit in your argument is presumption that your reads will be wrong and that a player that you consider strongly town will be scum, and thus you should play to that expectation. To that I would say that I don't think it makes sense to begin from the idea that your reads are wrong - it makes more sense to begin with lynching your scumreads. Should that fail, then there may be cause for concern and at that point it would be time to begin looking in the pairs previously more townread.Beginning with trying to lynch both the "scummy scum" and the "towny scum" by pairing them together seems destined to simply sacrifice a townier player for every scummier player we lynch.
Of course, this is quite abstract and a level removed from the actual people pairing together and playing the game, but on a theory level I don't think it's correct.
theoryIn post 139, shortaru wrote:Wait is this true or theory?In post 129, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I don't explain town reads, it's anti town.