Page 11 of 53

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:36 pm
by DVa
In post 247, Gamma Emerald wrote:Posting style when I strip away the robotic quirks.
this was my first impression too but what do you think of his shade when skitter calls him out?

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:36 pm
by probs a robot
In post 248, The Dark Wanderer wrote:
In post 246, skitter30 wrote:
In post 238, The Dark Wanderer wrote:DVa is incredibly wolfy in so many different ways and you trying to sneak her through into the townblock makes me feel even more strongly that you're her wolf partner.
who was this addressed to? robot?
yes i was talking to robot
Am I meant to respond to this?
It's both misrepresentative and a weak point. I would maybe see where you are coming from if you were paranoid of myself and Gamma being the scum team.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:37 pm
by skitter30
In post 249, DVa wrote:
In post 244, skitter30 wrote:you posted just before me
i didn't see your post beore i submitted it; it was directed to robot if that wasn't clear
I mean, you're probably telling the truth
but part of me almost is like, are you lying and you just didn't want to admit you didn't see my last response on this exact question

I believe you but it would have helped if you had done a pedit there, because it was not contextually obvious
i'm not entirely sure what you think i was lying about tbh

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:38 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 188, DVa wrote:
In post 187, probs a robot wrote:Do you think that if I replaced into a scum slot, I would enter the thread any differently?
I do. I don't mean your meme opening posts, I mean your sorting posts afterward, particularly your aggressive tone

You might come in as scum trying to sort, but I would be pretty surprised if you wrote the posts the way that you did
I think this is a good read
HEAL: probs a robot
Btw if DVa and probs a robot hydra they should be probs an omnic

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:43 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 225, northsidegal wrote:
In post 222, probs a robot wrote:I would support it, patching in Gamma Emerald instead of TDW and pending further interactions with TesXX in particular.
you would support it?

that raises an interesting question that i'd like to put out to everyone: who would be willing to support a coalition that didn't contain themselves in it?
Town who understood they probably wouldn’t be in the true coalition but support the proposed one?
Scum who has a buddy in it?
I can think of a couple reasons, why can’t you think of one?

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:44 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 235, probs a robot wrote:@northsidegal, do you see what I see with town!DVa? I am seriously reconsidering my current read on her.
Btw I have another thought on who this guy might be

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:45 pm
by probs a robot
Gamma, have your reads progressed at all? Besides healing me, of course.
I do have a comment to your last post, though I am still analysing various sources to provide a concise accurate response.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:46 pm
by probs a robot
I almost alt-slipped earlier and wouldn't mind being outed too much. Just avoid it if you wouldn't mind, please. It is more fun this way.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:46 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 250, DVa wrote:
In post 247, Gamma Emerald wrote:Posting style when I strip away the robotic quirks.
this was my first impression too but what do you think of his shade when skitter calls him out?
That was talking about who I thought robot was
On the read I think his association read is not that good but I don’t see why it’s scummy

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:48 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 256, probs a robot wrote:Gamma, have your reads progressed at all? Besides healing me, of course.
I do have a comment to your last post, though I am still analysing various sources to provide a concise accurate response.
Not really, I’ve been in silly mode for a while
The closest I got to getting serious was when I noted Tes still had me in his coalition

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:48 pm
by probs a robot
Do you still believe Tes is scum?

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:49 pm
by skitter30
gamma did you think tess's first post of heals/votes was serious?

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:49 pm
by northsidegal
In post 254, Gamma Emerald wrote:Town who understood they probably wouldn’t be in the true coalition but support the proposed one?
Scum who has a buddy in it?
I can think of a couple reasons, why can’t you think of one?
it wasn't a "who would do this" in the sense of disbelief, it was a literal question of which people

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:50 pm
by DVa
In post 258, Gamma Emerald wrote:On the read I think his association read is not that good but I don’t see why it’s scummy
the whole thing we're doing is pressing people on the strength of their townreads. skitter scumcasing his predecessor is a good chance for him to directly address the accusations against him, and instead he just shades it.

idk, maybe you're right and he's a lot lazier than I thought he'd be given the aggressive tone of his earlier post. but I would have thought he'd see the skitter case as an opportunity, not a threat

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:52 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 260, probs a robot wrote:Do you still believe Tes is scum?
Yeah but I haven’t really gotten strong feeling of that lately
In post 261, skitter30 wrote:gamma did you think tess's first post of heals/votes was serious?
I thought it was initially
I still have a concern about how Tes wasn’t being mindful of it
In post 262, northsidegal wrote:
In post 254, Gamma Emerald wrote:Town who understood they probably wouldn’t be in the true coalition but support the proposed one?
Scum who has a buddy in it?
I can think of a couple reasons, why can’t you think of one?
it wasn't a "who would do this" in the sense of disbelief, it was a literal question of which people
Ok
Well I would definitely do it as evidenced by last game

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:53 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 263, DVa wrote:
In post 258, Gamma Emerald wrote:On the read I think his association read is not that good but I don’t see why it’s scummy
the whole thing we're doing is pressing people on the strength of their townreads. skitter scumcasing his predecessor is a good chance for him to directly address the accusations against him, and instead he just shades it.

idk, maybe you're right and he's a lot lazier than I thought he'd be given the aggressive tone of his earlier post. but I would have thought he'd see the skitter case as an opportunity, not a threat
This actually makes a fair amount of sense
robot, the ball is in your court

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:53 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Btw thoughts on the hydra name?

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:53 pm
by probs a robot
In post 263, DVa wrote:
In post 258, Gamma Emerald wrote:On the read I think his association read is not that good but I don’t see why it’s scummy
the whole thing we're doing is pressing people on the strength of their townreads. skitter scumcasing his predecessor is a good chance for him to directly address the accusations against him, and instead he just shades it.

idk, maybe you're right and he's a lot lazier than I thought he'd be given the aggressive tone of his earlier post. but I would have thought he'd see the skitter case as an opportunity, not a threat
I will say this, mostly for post-game:

I correctly townread Musicjax and thought his alignment was very obvious.
Replying to skitter's case is naught but self-serving, as I am aware of my slot's alignment for FACT while 6 other slots are not.

Therefore I did not bother responding, as there are better uses for my time.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:54 pm
by skitter30
In post 264, Gamma Emerald wrote:I thought it was initially
I still have a concern about how Tes wasn’t being mindful of it
i thought it was pretty obvious that it was a meme/rvs/not serious or whatever

you caling out tess for not removing you from his coalition while saying he thought you were sketchy is a little surface-level imo

like you found him in an inconsistency so you're pushing him for it but i'm not sure if this is actually scummy or means anything from him beyond 'not changing his rvs post'

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:54 pm
by probs a robot
In post 266, Gamma Emerald wrote:Btw thoughts on the hydra name?
The hydra name is excellent. I would give it, as you humans say with your Face Books, one like.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:56 pm
by skitter30
In post 267, probs a robot wrote:
In post 263, DVa wrote:
In post 258, Gamma Emerald wrote:On the read I think his association read is not that good but I don’t see why it’s scummy
the whole thing we're doing is pressing people on the strength of their townreads. skitter scumcasing his predecessor is a good chance for him to directly address the accusations against him, and instead he just shades it.

idk, maybe you're right and he's a lot lazier than I thought he'd be given the aggressive tone of his earlier post. but I would have thought he'd see the skitter case as an opportunity, not a threat
I will say this, mostly for post-game:

I correctly townread Musicjax and thought his alignment was very obvious.
Replying to skitter's case is naught but self-serving, as I am aware of my slot's alignment for FACT while 6 other slots are not.

Therefore I did not bother responding, as there are better uses for my time.
i mean if you think music's alignment was obvious it might be a good idea to share why given that other people do not, and explained why they do not

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 7:00 pm
by probs a robot
I would prefer to allocate time to exercises which do not end in an impasse, wasting the time of everyone involved.
Though my conclusion here may be controversial! I will go down this path if players who I townread would enjoy it.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 7:02 pm
by probs a robot
Apologies if I sound defective.

1) It was a read I had prior to seeing my role pm.
2) I know for a fact whether or not it's true.
3) I would say the same thing regardless of my alignment.


So it does feel counter productive to me on a theoretical level.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 7:06 pm
by skitter30
i'm not entirely sure why you're assuming this is going to end in an impasse or why this is wasting my time; it's entirely possible you'll show me something townie about vizzy that i missed

p-edit: i mean yes your towniness (or profession of towniness, whatever) is obvious to you but it's not obvious to me so i don't enitrely get your refusal here really, even on a theoretical level

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 7:08 pm
by DVa
Here's what I want probs

If you are town, I want you in my townblocked coalition for game win

but that is not going to happen unless you are town enough that skitter retracts her case

because I kinda think skitter is more likely to be scum here than you, but your defensiveness on this point has significantly weakened my initial read

I want you to towncase vizzy and make skitter accept you in the townblock even if she's scum. That is my ideal in every game as town. For scum to accept that the town is townier.