Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:36 pm
this was my first impression too but what do you think of his shade when skitter calls him out?In post 247, Gamma Emerald wrote:Posting style when I strip away the robotic quirks.
this was my first impression too but what do you think of his shade when skitter calls him out?In post 247, Gamma Emerald wrote:Posting style when I strip away the robotic quirks.
Am I meant to respond to this?In post 248, The Dark Wanderer wrote:yes i was talking to robotIn post 246, skitter30 wrote:who was this addressed to? robot?In post 238, The Dark Wanderer wrote:DVa is incredibly wolfy in so many different ways and you trying to sneak her through into the townblock makes me feel even more strongly that you're her wolf partner.
i'm not entirely sure what you think i was lying about tbhIn post 249, DVa wrote:I mean, you're probably telling the truthIn post 244, skitter30 wrote:you posted just before me
i didn't see your post beore i submitted it; it was directed to robot if that wasn't clear
but part of me almost is like, are you lying and you just didn't want to admit you didn't see my last response on this exact question
I believe you but it would have helped if you had done a pedit there, because it was not contextually obvious
I think this is a good readIn post 188, DVa wrote:I do. I don't mean your meme opening posts, I mean your sorting posts afterward, particularly your aggressive toneIn post 187, probs a robot wrote:Do you think that if I replaced into a scum slot, I would enter the thread any differently?
You might come in as scum trying to sort, but I would be pretty surprised if you wrote the posts the way that you did
Town who understood they probably wouldn’t be in the true coalition but support the proposed one?In post 225, northsidegal wrote:you would support it?In post 222, probs a robot wrote:I would support it, patching in Gamma Emerald instead of TDW and pending further interactions with TesXX in particular.
that raises an interesting question that i'd like to put out to everyone: who would be willing to support a coalition that didn't contain themselves in it?
Btw I have another thought on who this guy might beIn post 235, probs a robot wrote:@northsidegal, do you see what I see with town!DVa? I am seriously reconsidering my current read on her.
That was talking about who I thought robot wasIn post 250, DVa wrote:this was my first impression too but what do you think of his shade when skitter calls him out?In post 247, Gamma Emerald wrote:Posting style when I strip away the robotic quirks.
Not really, I’ve been in silly mode for a whileIn post 256, probs a robot wrote:Gamma, have your reads progressed at all? Besides healing me, of course.
I do have a comment to your last post, though I am still analysing various sources to provide a concise accurate response.
it wasn't a "who would do this" in the sense of disbelief, it was a literal question of which peopleIn post 254, Gamma Emerald wrote:Town who understood they probably wouldn’t be in the true coalition but support the proposed one?
Scum who has a buddy in it?
I can think of a couple reasons, why can’t you think of one?
the whole thing we're doing is pressing people on the strength of their townreads. skitter scumcasing his predecessor is a good chance for him to directly address the accusations against him, and instead he just shades it.In post 258, Gamma Emerald wrote:On the read I think his association read is not that good but I don’t see why it’s scummy
Yeah but I haven’t really gotten strong feeling of that latelyIn post 260, probs a robot wrote:Do you still believe Tes is scum?
I thought it was initiallyIn post 261, skitter30 wrote:gamma did you think tess's first post of heals/votes was serious?
OkIn post 262, northsidegal wrote:it wasn't a "who would do this" in the sense of disbelief, it was a literal question of which peopleIn post 254, Gamma Emerald wrote:Town who understood they probably wouldn’t be in the true coalition but support the proposed one?
Scum who has a buddy in it?
I can think of a couple reasons, why can’t you think of one?
This actually makes a fair amount of senseIn post 263, DVa wrote:the whole thing we're doing is pressing people on the strength of their townreads. skitter scumcasing his predecessor is a good chance for him to directly address the accusations against him, and instead he just shades it.In post 258, Gamma Emerald wrote:On the read I think his association read is not that good but I don’t see why it’s scummy
idk, maybe you're right and he's a lot lazier than I thought he'd be given the aggressive tone of his earlier post. but I would have thought he'd see the skitter case as an opportunity, not a threat
I will say this, mostly for post-game:In post 263, DVa wrote:the whole thing we're doing is pressing people on the strength of their townreads. skitter scumcasing his predecessor is a good chance for him to directly address the accusations against him, and instead he just shades it.In post 258, Gamma Emerald wrote:On the read I think his association read is not that good but I don’t see why it’s scummy
idk, maybe you're right and he's a lot lazier than I thought he'd be given the aggressive tone of his earlier post. but I would have thought he'd see the skitter case as an opportunity, not a threat
i thought it was pretty obvious that it was a meme/rvs/not serious or whateverIn post 264, Gamma Emerald wrote:I thought it was initially
I still have a concern about how Tes wasn’t being mindful of it
The hydra name is excellent. I would give it, as you humans say with your Face Books, one like.In post 266, Gamma Emerald wrote:Btw thoughts on the hydra name?
i mean if you think music's alignment was obvious it might be a good idea to share why given that other people do not, and explained why they do notIn post 267, probs a robot wrote:I will say this, mostly for post-game:In post 263, DVa wrote:the whole thing we're doing is pressing people on the strength of their townreads. skitter scumcasing his predecessor is a good chance for him to directly address the accusations against him, and instead he just shades it.In post 258, Gamma Emerald wrote:On the read I think his association read is not that good but I don’t see why it’s scummy
idk, maybe you're right and he's a lot lazier than I thought he'd be given the aggressive tone of his earlier post. but I would have thought he'd see the skitter case as an opportunity, not a threat
I correctly townread Musicjax and thought his alignment was very obvious.
Replying to skitter's case is naught but self-serving, as I am aware of my slot's alignment for FACT while 6 other slots are not.
Therefore I did not bother responding, as there are better uses for my time.