Mafiascum.net

In post 249, TTTT wrote:day1 outside a newbie game and Clem is writing complete sentences?
things that make you go hmmm

In post 249, TTTT wrote:day1 outside a newbie game and Clem is writing complete sentences?
things that make you go hmmm

In post 256, BuJaber wrote:Scum team is clemency + rb + one of {junko, gamma}

In post 181, Flubbernugget wrote:Yeah I need to revisit eliot and lovebird

In post 184, ReaperOfSouls wrote:Flubbernugget Just a question for those that have played with him before, is this how he plays? 179 one game isn't meta.

In post 226, TTTT wrote:triple commas there indicate you are overly concerned with how your writing is viewed
you just subconsciously scum-claimed

In post 227, TTTT wrote:especially bc English isn't your native language
one down

In post 237, Clemency wrote:c,o,m,m,a t,e,l,l w,a,s a j,o,k,e
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

In post 238, TTTT wrote:^you complete me

In post 242, Sashaddin wrote:@Clemency:
What do you think of Elliot and Lovebird?

In post 244, Clemency wrote:i'm doing this thing where i actually answer questions directed at me
you guys like it?

In post 243, Clemency wrote:

In post 130, Eliot Ness wrote:I don't like the way you're conducting business here, lovebird. You're asking lots of questions that make me wonder why you asked them. Asking questions alone does not make you towny. Analysis does. What is your vote on us for, exactly? What are your actual opinions beyond just the "This is towny, this is not?" Any scum can ask questions to look town, and I think that's exactly what you're doing here.

so this kinda makes me curious considering at the time of the post lovebird asked maybe two full direct questions
this post feels reachy/forced to me

In post 134, Eliot Ness wrote:

In post 53, Lovebird wrote:

In post 39, BuJaber wrote:The claim is stupid if town, it's way more likely to be from scum.

How is it stupid?

This is the question that pinged us.

If you’re town here, you should be asking why it is scummy, not why it is stupid.

1. It assumes the person is town, which is concerning
2. A Townie would be more interested in why it’s more likely to come from scum and
3. Because of this, it looks more like a filler question than genuine scumhunting, and combined with the naked vote on us along with the lack of reasoning of any reads, looks like someone trying to seem like they are busy without actually digging in to any stances.

i feel like you're deriving far too many conclusions from a fairly insignificant post
this is a view i can only see from someone who's already painted someone as scum in their mind and is looking through that lens
i hate to be that guy but i really think this is tvt

In post 173, TTTT wrote:did you just change your avatar while I was mid-read?
damn you.

In post 226, TTTT wrote:triple commas there indicate you are overly concerned with how your writing is viewed
you just subconsciously scum-claimed

In post 240, TTTT wrote:
plz explain your TR on me

In post 256, BuJaber wrote:Scum team is clemency + rb + one of {junko, gamma}

In post 184, ReaperOfSouls wrote:Akarin 116 Seems to be pursuing a very reachy argument on Eyes w/o a face.

In post 185, Akarin wrote:I feel like the only reason people think my argument is reachy is because people keep misinterpreting it and then I try to explain it more and that level of explanation of any tell would seem reachy.

If I asked the two of you to explain the only-interacting-with-one-person read over and over and kept calling it crazy and you explained it with more and more words, I think it would be equally easy to call it reachy.

There are good reasons to suspect people jumping on (what seems on page 1 like) easy lynchbait

before

there is a wagon. (Because of bad reaction to pressure.)

This isn't a reach and it's not crazy. It's also not the strongest case ever, but it was strong for that point in the game.