Mafiascum.net

In post 203, Tim Goodman wrote:I'll look for another person to scumread.

Detective Pikachu or Klick

Choose one

In post 204, Detective Pikachu wrote:Tim how you feeling about LUV's posting so far?

What's your interest on him?

In post 210, Tim Goodman wrote:there's a lot of scummy people.

Who? I'm lacking them.

In post 131, RedPanda wrote:Is the pinkball a meta read?

In post 132, Pink Ball wrote:

In post 131, RedPanda wrote:Is the pinkball a meta read?

I was going to ask the same

No. I just really like his tone.

In post 133, EspressoPatronum wrote:

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=11051816#p11051816]post 124[/url], Lil Uzi Vert wrote: I’m voting him because I kinda think he was being intentionally obtuse in 64 but I like 69. I relate to it a lot and find myself in that position more often than I would like. No pun intended.

Re: 64 , I know that Creature and Klick talked in between his Klick and DP votes, but I wanted more of an explanation. He said his vote was to help pressure DP, but does that also mean he thinks Klick is more town?

It just seemed like a weak pivot shortly after making the wagon a "serious deal"

I don’t think he was serious. The VC prior to Creature placing his vote indicated that Klick’s wagon was a result of RVS at the time. Creature voting there without any reasoning provided makes me think he just wanted to meme around but it came off awkward or at best, add pressure.

Even if it was real, there’s a bit of an exchange between 54 and 62 that could have made him change his mind and town read Klick, or at least feel better about him or her. Since I believe he wasn’t serious, I don’t think the pivot is weak. He’s going from having placed a non-serious vote on an RVS wagon to sheeping a wagon that he believes has legit reasons or sheeping one of his town reads.

In post 143, Creature wrote:damn, one of my cats received euthanasia today.

Sorry to hear that

In post 157, Creature wrote:

In post 107, EspressoPatronum wrote:Interested to hear some thoughts from the following people:

u r a person 2
Lil Uzi Vert
Cinnamon
ClearlyClarity

Lurker scum can be pretty dangerous. These four haven't posted much yet.

I think this looks good though

Espresso can be town

Why can’t this post come from scum? I disagree with his take on lurker scum to be honest.

In post 219, ClearlyClarity wrote:

In post 218, EspressoPatronum wrote:Can you share why/how you got to your scumread of me? As it stands, it looks like it's either a bandwagon read or an OMGUS.

Honestly? You're right. Sorry. I signed up for too many games and I've always been more miserable in games outside of Newbie queue. I hate being in the dark about reads. Your posting has actually been p towny and I OMGUS'd out of annoyance.

This feels really unnatural to me.

In post 257, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 219, ClearlyClarity wrote:

In post 218, EspressoPatronum wrote:Can you share why/how you got to your scumread of me? As it stands, it looks like it's either a bandwagon read or an OMGUS.

Honestly? You're right. Sorry. I signed up for too many games and I've always been more miserable in games outside of Newbie queue. I hate being in the dark about reads. Your posting has actually been p towny and I OMGUS'd out of annoyance.

This feels really unnatural to me.

I thought it was genuine. #217 reads as though Clarity is annoyed, and she admits as much in #219.

What part is unnatural about the post is unnatural to you?

In post 256, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 157, Creature wrote:

In post 107, EspressoPatronum wrote:Interested to hear some thoughts from the following people:

u r a person 2
Lil Uzi Vert
Cinnamon
ClearlyClarity

Lurker scum can be pretty dangerous. These four haven't posted much yet.

I think this looks good though

Espresso can be town

Why can’t this post come from scum? I disagree with his take on lurker scum to be honest.

You disagree that lurker scum can be dangerous?? Please elaborate.

In post 254, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 133, EspressoPatronum wrote:

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=11051816#p11051816]post 124[/url], Lil Uzi Vert wrote: I’m voting him because I kinda think he was being intentionally obtuse in 64 but I like 69. I relate to it a lot and find myself in that position more often than I would like. No pun intended.

Re: 64 , I know that Creature and Klick talked in between his Klick and DP votes, but I wanted more of an explanation. He said his vote was to help pressure DP, but does that also mean he thinks Klick is more town?

It just seemed like a weak pivot shortly after making the wagon a "serious deal"

I don’t think he was serious. The VC prior to Creature placing his vote indicated that Klick’s wagon was a result of RVS at the time. Creature voting there without any reasoning provided makes me think he just wanted to meme around but it came off awkward or at best, add pressure.

Even if it was real, there’s a bit of an exchange between 54 and 62 that could have made him change his mind and town read Klick, or at least feel better about him or her. Since I believe he wasn’t serious, I don’t think the pivot is weak. He’s going from having placed a non-serious vote on an RVS wagon to sheeping a wagon that he believes has legit reasons or sheeping one of his town reads.

Creature's post on #52 (immediately before his vote) suggests he's no longer voting bcz of RVS. That's why I thought (and still think) his vote was serious.

The pivot was weak imo, but I have him as townlean from his other posts.

Side note - how do I link numbers to the corresponding posts? I've just been using #number to point ppl to the post in question, but a direct link is way more convenient for the reader.

My votes are almost always serious ftr.

VOTE: LUV

How long until you're going to have more game time URAP?

Creature amusingly is scum very often this game.

In post 258, EspressoPatronum wrote:

In post 257, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 219, ClearlyClarity wrote:

In post 218, EspressoPatronum wrote:Can you share why/how you got to your scumread of me? As it stands, it looks like it's either a bandwagon read or an OMGUS.

Honestly? You're right. Sorry. I signed up for too many games and I've always been more miserable in games outside of Newbie queue. I hate being in the dark about reads. Your posting has actually been p towny and I OMGUS'd out of annoyance.

This feels really unnatural to me.

I thought it was genuine. #217 reads as though Clarity is annoyed, and she admits as much in #219.

What part is unnatural about the post is unnatural to you?

First three sentences.

In post 259, EspressoPatronum wrote:

In post 256, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 157, Creature wrote:

In post 107, EspressoPatronum wrote:Interested to hear some thoughts from the following people:

u r a person 2
Lil Uzi Vert
Cinnamon
ClearlyClarity

Lurker scum can be pretty dangerous. These four haven't posted much yet.

I think this looks good though

Espresso can be town

Why can’t this post come from scum? I disagree with his take on lurker scum to be honest.

You disagree that lurker scum can be dangerous?? Please elaborate.

You are unable to mislead, misdirect, and manipulate consistently if you’re lurking.

In post 261, EspressoPatronum wrote:Side note - how do I link numbers to the corresponding posts? I've just been using #number to point ppl to the post in question, but a direct link is way more convenient for the reader.

[post=Number]Number[/post]

UNVOTE:

Not sure if I’m feeling this anymore.

Gonna reread Klick-DP again.

I'm happy calling EP/CC/Chemist town. Creature I'm less confident on but I'd still call it a town lean. Of the more prolific posters in the last couple of pages, LUV isn't giving me particularly good vibes.

In post 230, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 223, Cinnamon wrote:

In post 222, EspressoPatronum wrote:

In post 219, ClearlyClarity wrote:

In post 218, EspressoPatronum wrote:Can you share why/how you got to your scumread of me? As it stands, it looks like it's either a bandwagon read or an OMGUS.

Honestly? You're right. Sorry. I signed up for too many games and I've always been more miserable in games outside of Newbie queue. I hate being in the dark about reads. Your posting has actually been p towny and I OMGUS'd out of annoyance.

Thanks for the honesty. If you find the time over the next few days, can you drop a quick post on people who feel the most scummy? We can @ you with specifics from there.

UNVOTE:

Got my sights set on URAP and Cinnamon now. Hoping to see more content from them tomorrow.

I'm not really sure what more content you want to see right now. It's kind of weird that you say that when I've posted my reads and you haven't interacted with them at all.

I like this post, feels genuine

Talk to me about this? I had the opposite reaction.

I was waiting for both cinnamon and clearity reactions to my post to vote for the scummier one but since clearity is ignoring this game, I'm forced to choose.

I don't like that cinnamon ignored my post. Seems like cinnamon is scared of a back and forth that might happen.

@Clarity and @Cinnamon: you were both a pleasure to play with in the short time you were here