In post 248, NorwegianboyEE wrote:That's it Emperor? Give us your thoughts on recent events at least.
- Kraeg bandwagon, approve or disapprove?
- Who's your main townread/scumreads?
- Gramr and Luca 1v1, do you think it's TvS, SvS or TvT?
In post 254, profii wrote:Well I played with you in a boonytoonz game where we were both scum and you died n1 after a relatively inactive say 1 so bear that in mind...
In post 254, profii wrote:Well I played with you in a boonytoonz game where we were both scum and you died n1 after a relatively inactive say 1 so bear that in mind...
In post 237, profii wrote:I read the bold bit as "No need to [leave my vote on Mohab, as it is] a vanity wagon. Felt like turning up the pressure on the Kraeg wagon may help sort [that inactive slot], but the Garmr/Luca 1v1 produced some interesting content [so can convieniently vote 1 of those 2 {Garmr} as I know they are both town players, meaning I dont have to get stuck on scum wagon]In post 151, Billy Pilgrim wrote:UNVOTE: Mohab
No need to be on a vanity wagon. Felt like turning up the pressure on the Kraeg wagon may help sort, but the Garmr/Luca 1v1 produced some interesting content.I will have some thoughts on this later.
When I skimmed it, Luca felt town. Wanna go back through the isos though.
I am aware this is very pre-flippy kraeg/billy scum team.
I also note your distinct change in buddying tone from red block to oh you are mis repping me. I dont think I am. Based on the following:
50: So he's [kraeg] getting scumread by two people because he came in trying to sort? I don't know that I agree with Kraeg's reasoning, but points for trying. - this is you querying someone attacking Kraeg, white knighting, if you will
62 making sure someone is/isnt scum reading kraeg
70 i felt like because kraeg comes in and makes a point about your VLA, even though, as i mentioned at the time, you were actually posting (and have been doing so a lot more than he has) it was a good cop/bad cop act - i mean, we can vote kraeg together at this point if you want?
71 again querying people who have an issue with the vla point, again white knighting if you will
73 giving kudos to garmrs "slayers gambit" theory - i.e. acknowledging there is something scummy about him, despite never having expressed this yourself, whilst also giving momentum to a theory from Garmr that Kraeg isnt actually scum.
I am guessing you are going to say I've got that all wrong, because despite what I am reading as white knighting, you said Kraeg is null/need more info in 92 ? I just find it a weird progression on your part...
ok so 109 does offer some motivation for that. You call it shading and your exception to the vla stuff is consistent with 71
and ok I'm bored of getting all the post numbers and linking them back but here is the crux of the issue:
there is an element of a white knight vibe coming across as i've highlighted above
there is also a consistent explaination that you acknowledge the surface level scummy-ness of Kraeg and are probing the voters to see who goes where
given those voters have dissapeared I think it's probable i am off the mark and you are actually sorting so I'll unvote
UNVOTE:
I'll even try and summon EFN with you
VOTE: emporer flippy nips
I'm quite confused why people are making a huge fuss about this.In post 24, Kraeg wrote:VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
I'm gonna go ahead and sheep Garmr with this. How is profii describing how the game is getting out of RVS an accusation?
If you stick around this time I won't have to try and vote summon you. I just missed you. You bring the gifs.In post 249, Emperor flippyNips wrote:In post 236, Jackal711 wrote:VOTE COUNT 1.6
Emperor FlippyNips (1) - Billy Pilgrim
Day 1 deadline is Friday, September 13th at 10:00 am PDT which is in(expired on 2019-09-13 10:00:00)
billy what's this thing we're doing? I get busy you vote me, I jump back in you don't vote. & here we are, you voting me again
This is the one that I've had experience with.In post 255, Emperor flippyNips wrote:yah & I have other games where im the most active player & die d1 too soooooooooo
This is a misrep. Go look back on that vote again. On my other post, I was just trying to acknowledge that I may appear serious. Still, it was just an RVS thing. I don't think I did a hard accusation.In post 186, Mohab500 wrote:I feel like I was focused trying to find a lead that I just built something on Luca solely based on just trying to find a lead, so looking back I don't think my point was very convincing.
As for Kraeg, the time you posted I still had a slight scum lean on him. After his latest posts, though, I feel like they're far too dynamic with their thoughts/posting and I have an even larger scum lean on him now. Kraeg tells Norwegian to 'forgot about his vote on him because it's just an RVS thing' but his posts earlier imply that he was much more serious about this than he's stating now. Also, I feel like the move to Garmr is far too sudden and invited by the fact that others started the Garmr wagon, but honestly that could be said for multiple players here, I guess.
I haven't really delved into the possibility of a Garmr + Kraeg scum team, on the surface from what I remember it looks a bit unlikely but not impossible.
For the time being I'll go back to VOTE: Kraeg as I feel more confident with a push on him than Garmr with what we have now.
This post makes me feel like Billy is even more town. I disagree with his opinion on kreag but it's not what scum buddies do for each other and if billy was scum and kreag town he wouldn't want to diffuse the kreag wagon this way.In post 268, Billy Pilgrim wrote:What happened to Garmr?
Here's where I'm at. We're in a pretty low activity game state. This works real well for scum because it breeds apathy. It also doesn't help town sort much. I'm kinda lost. Kraeg came in hyper aggro. I don't read that as scummy but others were. I think what I found a lack of effort on reads from that slot was a problem.
@Norwegian - why is Kraeg scum. Is it just that he accused you of taking us out of RVS? And if that's why, why is that enough?
I don't have a strong candidate at the moment, but I think Mohab is my preference. Sheeped the Kraeg wagon. Then hopped onto Garmr saying it felt like caught scum. Then just left and went back to Kraeg. I feel like that's the worst vote all game so far so thats where I wanna be.
VOTE: Mohab
I just reread my post and I don't think I communicated what I meant, my phone's been acting up. I meant I find the slot kind of scummy because I saw a lack of effort at making reads. Don't know if that changes your opinion.In post 272, Garmr wrote:This post makes me feel like Billy is even more town. I disagree with his opinion on kreag but it's not what scum buddies do for each other and if billy was scum and kreag town he wouldn't want to diffuse the kreag wagon this way.In post 268, Billy Pilgrim wrote:What happened to Garmr?
Here's where I'm at. We're in a pretty low activity game state. This works real well for scum because it breeds apathy. It also doesn't help town sort much. I'm kinda lost. Kraeg came in hyper aggro. I don't read that as scummy but others were. I think what I found a lack of effort on reads from that slot was a problem.
@Norwegian - why is Kraeg scum. Is it just that he accused you of taking us out of RVS? And if that's why, why is that enough?
I don't have a strong candidate at the moment, but I think Mohab is my preference. Sheeped the Kraeg wagon. Then hopped onto Garmr saying it felt like caught scum. Then just left and went back to Kraeg. I feel like that's the worst vote all game so far so thats where I wanna be.
VOTE: Mohab
