In post 104, Compath wrote:Clidd feels like he's trying too hard to be honest.
@Clidd - How is your Iconeum read different from the null reads you have on Luca and DDL?
Why did you basically completely ignore slaxx?
Why do you need something to "radically" change your opinion in order to not scumread Ame, despite stating that you only find them to be slightly suspicious?
Why is playing a character town-indicative for Hectic? In my opinion, it'd be scum-indicative because he gets to hide behind the character that he's playing.
What specifically did you find scummy in Kanna/my RQS answers? Did you find the fact that we quickly complied with RQS to be scummy, or something else?
1. It depends on whether I can differentiate the questioning between
Iconeum
and
Ame
, considering that it could be the beginning of a possible death tunnel, or just a different line of thought. I have seen this kind of attitude before, so I wanted to confirm that the intention, too, would be the same. Based on that, it is like a ''
Joker
'', as it can take both sides depending on the interpretation of a specific attitude, post or action.
2. There is no specific reason, considering that I forgot about him during the reasoning. I have been overloading myself recently, so it's not uncommon for this to happen. As I saw that it had happened, I thought about directing a question to him, so that I didn't have to rewrite my post and read his ISO.
3. Because it is a progressive sensation, that starts small and intensifies as the interactions happen. Already predicting this, I used the term to justify if, later, I changed my mind, through some significant post or event.
4. Well, that would mean talking about games in progress, which is forbidden, but basically it's not something normal coming from
scum!Hectic
that I expect. And, also, it seems like an activity that he is enjoying doing and demands editing time, so I believe that, in this context, it would not be used in bad faith. But, of course, it would make sense if he sought to switch to narration in order to disrupt the behavioral read of his posts, in that case, it would be up to you to judge it as bad or not.
5. In a simple way, it would be the parallel that I drew with one of my two games as scum. It was not conclusive, but intigative to promote an interaction between us, like the one that is happening right now.