Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2021 11:34 am
@Lotus- why wheme?
@wheme- why unwnd?
@wheme- why unwnd?
I have town lean on Albert and from what has been said I think it’s to early for unwind to get shot
I have town lean on Albert and from what has been said I think it’s to early for unwind to get shot
His reactions to Mush's pressure were composed and reasonable. And he seems to be in opposition with Duchess who I think is scum.
I honestly had the same thought just now
Why would you die.
What makes you think it’s a bus?In post 258, RLotus wrote:Well that's not a strong read but it seems like unwnd may be bussing
unwnd is completely null to me. I just find it strange how quickly they came up with that.
If we shoot the godfather the gunbearer also diesIn post 263, Imperium wrote:Got it.
My question is wondering if I’m misunderstanding the mechanics. I’ll reread.
Ok well don't vote thenIn post 198, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:False. /Especially/ with the way I play Mafia, and /definitely/ in this setup.In post 195, SirCakez wrote:It indicates who you want elimmed
Even if you don't actually have control over itit only helps town later to see who was voting who
My voting history is manipulative as hell in an ordinary Mafia game and attempting to get anything out of it is pointless. I'll often go without voting for most of a dayphase while I press multiple slots aggressively, or rapidly shift my vote around for only about 48 hours and then let it sit on someone I don't even scumread for awhile. So already, even if this were an ordinary game, me specifically having my vote down isn't helpful to town unless its time to wagon for an elimination, and then it's only helpful as weight on the wagon.
In this setup, it provides information to scum on who they can manipulate and in what way. Worse yet, unless the gunbearer /wants/ people to vote, it doesn't even help the town in the process. I even went over this in detail in one of my /very first posts in this thread/. Did you read my ISO before you decided to ask me to do something I went to great lengths to call out as having /basically negative utility/? No? Well, I would suggest you go and /do that/ then.
Seems pretty obvious to me no? They keep mentioning the gun and how they don't want it like they're a innocent townie with bad reads. It seems pretty fake.In post 200, Imperium wrote:How so?In post 36, SirCakez wrote:Norfolk's posting just seemed excessively LAMIST to me
I agree with this logic (no this is not townreading Imperium)In post 203, Imperium wrote:Voting isn’t going to give the scumteam information that’s dangerous to town any more than using townreads gives the scumteam information.
Vote if you want. Don’t vote if you want.
It doesn’t really matter.
Your playstyle and tone is extremely obnoxious. This is not a read on you but a comment.In post 207, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:It's interesting that you think I can stop anyone from answering your questions, or that I would even necessarily want to stop it. More content is better, right? I hate your first post on this page for reasons entirely unrelated to you getting an answer to your question.
And it's even more interesting that you think I'm butting into your conversations at all. Should I simply not post in the thread whenever you are waiting for replies? Don't bother answering that. It's rhetorical, because even if the answer is yes, it's an unrealistic desire that literally no one will ever follow for you. The point is that I have no earthly idea what your expectations for me are here. That said, even if I did know, I'm inclined to not humor them at all from this point onward anyway, given that you jumped directly to appeal to ridicule when you came to these entirely false conclusions.