Mafiascum.net

vc

Ok I'm bad then.

In post 242, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 238, T3 wrote:Val and Clark are both town for the above.

i dont know who scum is anymore.

t3, i willl ask u

who is scum

can u answer my question u scummity scum scum scum!

GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 242, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 238, T3 wrote:Val and Clark are both town for the above.

i dont know who scum is anymore.

t3, i willl ask u

who is scum

can u answer my question u scummity scum scum scum!

In post 250, GrandpaMo wrote:vc

I have no idea.

In post 253, T3 wrote:

GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 242, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 238, T3 wrote:Val and Clark are both town for the above.

i dont know who scum is anymore.

t3, i willl ask u

who is scum

can u answer my question u scummity scum scum scum!

In post 250, GrandpaMo wrote:vc

I have no idea.

lol ok i think u are town

i had u as hard null and u were the only one as null

i literally have no idea who scum is either

like i have too many townreadsss this gameee plssss someone do something scummmyyyy

In post 9, LunarRest wrote:Hi. I'm new to the game and I'm not really smart either, so please bear with me.

hmm ig i might need to reread lunar rest -- they were also someone who i havent focused on too much because they were "new"

@lunar whats ur reads looking like pls

Town: lunar val clark psyche nancy
everyone else: everyone else.

In post 256, T3 wrote:Town: lunar val clark psyche nancy
everyone else: everyone else.

Grandpa/Blurry scum team then. Solved game gg

Real talk, Blurry's posts suck and they're coasting hard while everyone else fights each other over a whole lot of nothing.

In post 245, T3 wrote:I believe Nancy was on the alt Emily but I might be wrong. Gramma, posting style, and time zones match.

I initially thought the same. But of the 3 accounts that mislimmed Grandpa - Loki Dokie, Hopkirk, Emily (see here); only Hopkirk was also on the bugspray wagon, as per Nancys 146. GrandpaMo also has reason to think the Nancy Alt flipped scum (not sure where that comes from, but OK), and Hopkirk is the only other one to fit that description too.

Interestingly, the briefest of looks at that ISO throws up red flags as far as a theoretical scum!Nancy=Hopkirk goes - I can see the "I'm hurt and you are a meanie" attitude coming through from the very first post. That would be a very good reason right off the bat why a scum!Nancy in this game wants to be coy about her scum game in 1009, if we are right about the identity of the alt.

That is why I don't get it. If you aren't scum in this game, why do you need to protect your scum meta from scrutiny? If protecting the alt important to you, then just don't mention the information you gleaned from your alt play, just say "I found this game of Grandpa's, and this is what I see" and don’t mention you were actually in it; or else say "I played in this game under alt X", and just roll a new alt for your next game. Trying to hide the existence of a game you played as scum only makes sense me to me if you also rolled scum this game.

Correction, the reference to the Nancy alt also being on the bugspray wagon is in post 147, not 146.

In post 147, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:However, it’s reckless to put anyone higher than E-2, which is why I miselimed bugspray.

Hopkirk is a 2013 account.

Correct. Also happens to be the only account that both mislimmed Grandpa, and mislimmed bugspray. 1009 is the only Grandpa game (with the exception of the one we just finished together) in which Grandpa was mislimmed as town. All the others, he either was scum, night killed, or survived. He can correct me if I am wrong on that, but I believe I've checked all his games now. Also looks like the only game with both bugspray and GrandpaMo on the player list, and the Nancy Drew account makes an appearence on it, albeit the post made by that account is wiped by the mod.

As such, I see no other possibility. Nancy herself basically outed it when she said "I also mislimmed bugspray", unless you consider that to be a very clever ruse. Remember, at the time of that 147 post, she wasn't under any pressure.

In post 256, T3 wrote:Town: lunar val clark psyche nancy
everyone else: everyone else.

In post 257, Roden wrote:

In post 256, T3 wrote:Town: lunar val clark psyche nancy
everyone else: everyone else.

Grandpa/Blurry scum team then. Solved game gg

In post 258, Roden wrote:Real talk, Blurry's posts suck and they're coasting hard while everyone else fights each other over a whole lot of nothing.

ok pog we vote blurry then ez

also im ur town smh dont vote off town

In post 259, Val89 wrote:

In post 245, T3 wrote:I believe Nancy was on the alt Emily but I might be wrong. Gramma, posting style, and time zones match.

I initially thought the same. But of the 3 accounts that mislimmed Grandpa - Loki Dokie, Hopkirk, Emily (see here); only Hopkirk was also on the bugspray wagon, as per Nancys 146. GrandpaMo also has reason to think the Nancy Alt flipped scum (not sure where that comes from, but OK), and Hopkirk is the only other one to fit that description too.

Interestingly, the briefest of looks at that ISO throws up red flags as far as a theoretical scum!Nancy=Hopkirk goes - I can see the "I'm hurt and you are a meanie" attitude coming through from the very first post. That would be a very good reason right off the bat why a scum!Nancy in this game wants to be coy about her scum game in 1009, if we are right about the identity of the alt.

That is why I don't get it. If you aren't scum in this game, why do you need to protect your scum meta from scrutiny? If protecting the alt important to you, then just don't mention the information you gleaned from your alt play, just say "I found this game of Grandpa's, and this is what I see" and don’t mention you were actually in it; or else say "I played in this game under alt X", and just roll a new alt for your next game. Trying to hide the existence of a game you played as scum only makes sense me to me if you also rolled scum this game.

"i carried a mislim on grandpa" they refer to me when i was town.

town says that to town?

no. that implies they are scum lol val what logic is that -- u silly goose

Grandpa, I would accept your waterfowl epithet for me with good grace if "I carried a mislim on grandpa" was in fact what Nancy said, but it wasn't. It was:

In post 62, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Wrt to Mo, I miselimed him in a past game.

No mention of "carrying" involved.

Town says that to town? Yes, they bloody well do - I say I mislimmed you in our game (sorry about that, old chap), and we were both town.

In any case, if you are right that only scum says that, then that's only further confirmation that Hopkirk and Nancy are one and the same; given that Hopkirk was the only scum on your wagon in 1009.

In post 264, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 259, Val89 wrote:

In post 245, T3 wrote:I believe Nancy was on the alt Emily but I might be wrong. Gramma, posting style, and time zones match.

I initially thought the same. But of the 3 accounts that mislimmed Grandpa - Loki Dokie, Hopkirk, Emily (see here); only Hopkirk was also on the bugspray wagon, as per Nancys 146. GrandpaMo also has reason to think the Nancy Alt flipped scum (not sure where that comes from, but OK), and Hopkirk is the only other one to fit that description too.

Interestingly, the briefest of looks at that ISO throws up red flags as far as a theoretical scum!Nancy=Hopkirk goes - I can see the "I'm hurt and you are a meanie" attitude coming through from the very first post. That would be a very good reason right off the bat why a scum!Nancy in this game wants to be coy about her scum game in 1009, if we are right about the identity of the alt.

That is why I don't get it. If you aren't scum in this game, why do you need to protect your scum meta from scrutiny? If protecting the alt important to you, then just don't mention the information you gleaned from your alt play, just say "I found this game of Grandpa's, and this is what I see" and don’t mention you were actually in it; or else say "I played in this game under alt X", and just roll a new alt for your next game. Trying to hide the existence of a game you played as scum only makes sense me to me if you also rolled scum this game.

"i carried a mislim on grandpa" they refer to me when i was town.

town says that to town?

no. that implies they are scum lol val what logic is that -- u silly goose

In post 265, Val89 wrote:Grandpa, I would accept your waterfowl epithet for me with good grace if "I carried a mislim on grandpa" was in fact what Nancy said, but it wasn't. It was:

In post 62, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Wrt to Mo, I miselimed him in a past game.

No mention of "carrying" involved.

Town says that to town? Yes, they bloody well do - I say I mislimmed you in our game (sorry about that, old chap), and we were both town.

In any case, if you are right that only scum says that, then that's only further confirmation that Hopkirk and Nancy are one and the same; given that Hopkirk was the only scum on your wagon in 1009.

eh same thing just going off by memory -- most of the time its scum. i dont think i would say mislim here especially in the context of finding out my allignment and how i played. the context was in my playstyle

also u werer like the fifth scum in that game shh

hi marashu!
i'm voting blurryx!


everyone should be voting blurryx. i even think that should be the lynch for today!

Now we're talking! I have no idea why Blurry got ignored after Psyche made their analysis on them.

VOTE: BlurryX

In post 270, Roden wrote:Now we're talking! I have no idea why Blurry got ignored after Psyche made their analysis on them.

VOTE: BlurryX

Blurry isn't being ignored. Psyche said nothing wrong. Analysis was correct. I'm wary.

In post 272, ClarkBar wrote:

In post 270, Roden wrote:Now we're talking! I have no idea why Blurry got ignored after Psyche made their analysis on them.

VOTE: BlurryX

Blurry isn't being ignored. Psyche said nothing wrong. Analysis was correct. I'm wary.

I'll reword that. The analysis didn't get nearly as much attention as it should have. It reads like someone saw their buddy get scum read and redirected attention onto somebody else.

Can you reword that a second time? For clarity?