Mafiascum.net

Who the FUCK is katniss?

In post 246, Thestatusquo wrote:Ok but that's not responsive to my question or my point.

your point was self demonstrated to be defeated.

In post 250, Thestatusquo wrote:Who the FUCK is katniss?

Katniss Firebringer

The spark of the revolution

ok i don't get it

you yourself admit the wagon is dumb

me calling it out as such is just me being honest about an objectively dumb wagon

pedit

i wanted to call out this wagon as specifically dumb because it's what i saw, there's no special motive or anything. just because wagons that are dumb happen doesn't mean i'm not allowed to call it out as such

pedit

holy shit what am i lying about

can i vote for bell only

In post 247, Milobird wrote:Good think I’m here for you to read them Katniss!

i pretty much always read u as town tho. how does that balance it out

In post 255, Firebringer wrote:

In post 247, Milobird wrote:Good think I’m here for you to read them Katniss!

i pretty much always read u as town tho. how does that balance it out

When have you seen me as scum tho

VOTE: STD

11 pages and 0 scumreads. I am doing mafia like a champ

In post 256, Milobird wrote:

In post 255, Firebringer wrote:

In post 247, Milobird wrote:Good think I’m here for you to read them Katniss!

i pretty much always read u as town tho. how does that balance it out

When have you seen me as scum tho

good point

ok you found me

it's not possible for town to call out a wagon as dumb

you're right shea

In post 257, Thestatusquo wrote:

F

I

R

S

T

S

E

R

I

O

U

S

V

O

T

E

T

I

M

E

VOTE: STD

i liked when ur vote was on me better

In post 253, Save The Dragons wrote:ok i don't get it

you yourself admit the wagon is dumb

me calling it out as such is just me being honest about an objectively dumb wagon

pedit

i wanted to call out this wagon as specifically dumb because it's what i saw, there's no special motive or anything. just because wagons that are dumb happen doesn't mean i'm not allowed to call it out as such

pedit

holy shit what am i lying about

How is the wagon on firebringer more objectively dumb than a couple people saying they were going to policy sirCakez?

And I don't believe that you don't have a purpose when you make posts generally speaking.

It's not that you aren't allowed to call things out as dumb, it speaks to me to your mindset when you're reading the thread. It's like, a very surface level thing to call out, because you know its SUPPOSED to be dumb. So it looks to me like you're trying to sort of insert yourself into a pseudo serious discussion while actually saying literally nothing of consequence. It looks like you're talking about the game but you're actually not. I don't see a lot of town players feel the need to comment on how things in RVS are dumb, because they're too busy doing dumb things in RVS and they know it doesn't matter.

It's like simultaneously hyper aware of gamestate but not aware of the normal flow of a mafia game at the same time.

so yeah, that draws a vote.

In post 260, Save The Dragons wrote:ok you found me

it's not possible for town to call out a wagon as dumb

you're right shea

And honestly this reaction is really bad. The whole sarcastic dismissal thing doesn't match what I've seen from town you in other games.

fwiw I don't know what bell is talking about re:lying either.

I wasn’t bluffing about the Pikachu socks
Also I’m cool with the StD wagon as it stands

-Gamma

Ok shea can be in don't touch day 1 bin, which is where i was probably going to put him anyway. But sure those posts earned it

In post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:How is the wagon on firebringer more objectively dumb than a couple people saying they were going to policy sirCakez?

asked and answered with ralts, i didn't realize there was a wagon there.

and it's not mutually exclusive. i can think both are bad and might only post about one. c'mon dude

In post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:And I don't believe that you don't have a purpose when you make posts generally speaking.

what's the scum motivation behind calling a wagon bad

In post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:It's not that you aren't allowed to call things out as dumb, it speaks to me to your mindset when you're reading the thread. It's like, a very surface level thing to call out, because you know its SUPPOSED to be dumb. So it looks to me like you're trying to sort of insert yourself into a pseudo serious discussion while actually saying literally nothing of consequence. It looks like you're talking about the game but you're actually not. I don't see a lot of town players feel the need to comment on how things in RVS are dumb, because they're too busy doing dumb things in RVS and they know it doesn't matter.

how is me disavowing the FB wagon not a dumb thing i'm doing in RVS

In post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:It's like simultaneously hyper aware of gamestate but not aware of the normal flow of a mafia game at the same time.

why do you think i'm not aware of the normal flow of a mafia game

In post 263, Thestatusquo wrote:

In post 260, Save The Dragons wrote:ok you found me

it's not possible for town to call out a wagon as dumb

you're right shea

And honestly this reaction is really bad. The whole sarcastic dismissal thing doesn't match what I've seen from town you in other games.

citation needed

In post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:How is the wagon on firebringer more objectively dumb than a couple people saying they were going to policy sirCakez?

if i was going to argue anything its because u were attempting to make the wagon appear more serious than sir cakez wagon was and cakez happened in obviously joking rvs style first few pages where mood was different. to say these two things should be treated at same level doesn't ring same.

GAMMA DELIVERS

I popped a melly

Sk is only here for socks

In post 267, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:How is the wagon on firebringer more objectively dumb than a couple people saying they were going to policy sirCakez?

asked and answered with ralts, i didn't realize there was a wagon there.

and it's not mutually exclusive. i can think both are bad and might only post about one. c'mon dude

In post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:And I don't believe that you don't have a purpose when you make posts generally speaking.

what's the scum motivation behind calling a wagon bad

In post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:It's not that you aren't allowed to call things out as dumb, it speaks to me to your mindset when you're reading the thread. It's like, a very surface level thing to call out, because you know its SUPPOSED to be dumb. So it looks to me like you're trying to sort of insert yourself into a pseudo serious discussion while actually saying literally nothing of consequence. It looks like you're talking about the game but you're actually not. I don't see a lot of town players feel the need to comment on how things in RVS are dumb, because they're too busy doing dumb things in RVS and they know it doesn't matter.

how is me disavowing the FB wagon not a dumb thing i'm doing in RVS

In post 262, Thestatusquo wrote:It's like simultaneously hyper aware of gamestate but not aware of the normal flow of a mafia game at the same time.

why do you think i'm not aware of the normal flow of a mafia game

1) first quote: so? do you usually call out all dumb 3 person wagons you become aware of on page 9 of a large?

2) second quote: ok but you're missing my point which is that people generally don't do this because they know its fluff and they are looking to find actual things to talk about which might create meaningful information for them to solve other players alignment which brings me to

3) third quote: I don't see you doing that here. It's less a scum motivation thing and more of a scum mindset thing. Scum frequently have a hard time doing the whole trying to solve players thing because they already know the alignment of their partners, so they find ways to talk about the game which don't have actual consequence. they want to look like they're scum hunting or trying to divine alignment, but they're not. Your statement was that. It was the exact kind of statement scum makes when they're trying to look like they're making game relevant observations which under closer scrutiny are actually just meaningless fluff.

And that brings me to the snarky citation needed post. The town std I'm familiar with would be attempting to solve me through this discussion. you're not. you're attempting to shade my arguments and try to make them look ridiculous. every single response you've made has been a slight misinterpretation of what I'm saying to make it look slightly worse than it actually is. I don't get the impression at all that you're curious about my alignment here, and given that my meta as scum definitely includes making aggressive d1 pushes (side eye: fb for townbinning me when he should know that about my scum game. potential pocket attempt?) one would think you would be.

So uh yeah STD is scum.

In post 272, Thestatusquo wrote:1) first quote: so? do you usually call out all dumb 3 person wagons you become aware of on page 9 of a large?

no

i post what i feel as town and edit myself as scum

guess which one this was

In post 272, Thestatusquo wrote:2) second quote: ok but you're missing my point which is that people generally don't do this because they know its fluff and they are looking to find actual things to talk about which might create meaningful information for them to solve other players alignment which brings me to

since when do i do what people generally do or don't do

In post 272, Thestatusquo wrote:3) third quote: I don't see you doing that here. It's less a scum motivation thing and more of a scum mindset thing. Scum frequently have a hard time doing the whole trying to solve players thing because they already know the alignment of their partners, so they find ways to talk about the game which don't have actual consequence. they want to look like they're scum hunting or trying to divine alignment, but they're not. Your statement was that. It was the exact kind of statement scum makes when they're trying to look like they're making game relevant observations which under closer scrutiny are actually just meaningless fluff.

isn't it weird how i ended up voting one of the wagoners tho :thinking emoji:

In post 272, Thestatusquo wrote:And that brings me to the snarky citation needed post. The town std I'm familiar with would be attempting to solve me through this discussion. you're not. you're attempting to shade my arguments and try to make them look ridiculous. every single response you've made has been a slight misinterpretation of what I'm saying to make it look slightly worse than it actually is. I don't get the impression at all that you're curious about my alignment here, and given that my meta as scum definitely includes making aggressive d1 pushes (side eye: fb for townbinning me when he should know that about my scum game. potential pocket attempt?) one would think you would be.

i think you may not have an updated meta

none of that was actually responsive. please try again.