Mafiascum.net

In post 241, marcistar wrote:i dont think darbys scum. whats the possible scum motive here..?

I don’t think Darby is scum either but defending the slot with pressure on it is kinda a basic scum maneuver

Let me introduce you to Loftwing and Cool Cookie.

true true but how hard hes sticking to it i dont think its that

yeet

Val89 [4]:

Gamma Emerald, NorwegianboyEE, T3, marcistar

DArby [2]:

camelCasedSnivy, AliceK

AliceK [1]:

Jolyne

marcistar [1]:

Val89

Not_Mafia [1]:

Not_Mafia

NorwegianboyEE [1]:

DArby

T3 [1]:

Dwlee99

not voting [2]:

redtea, toxictaipan

mod notes

~ everyone has confirmed.

flavour

Okay. So. I'm going to try this one more time before I go to sleep because this actually is bothering me.

In post 237, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 234, DArby wrote:How is trying to do that actually reading my argument?

I already said i got your alignment through this.
So i'm not trying to read you, i just am dismantling your case because i'm town and i need to get an elimination on scum in this day phase. And i need influence for that.

Like I said "you're not reading my arguments" and you responded with "I already got you're alignment" ?? I do not care if you town read me. I'm invested in you misconstruing my arguments. You're not dismantling my arguments you're trying to dismantle me the debater. I care much less about being right than clearing information, but I do not feel you are listening to me so I'm trying to explain what I am saying. Like in any capacity.

Also,

In post 236, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think the problem lies in you jumping in the way of a conversation you were never a part of. If you dislike the logic but think the push has value, that’s something you should hold onto until the push has had time to simmer a bit. At that point if you think someone is continuing to utilize bad logic, you can then push that with a stronger conviction than jumping the gun calling it out at the start. Scum reveal themselves most handily when their guards are down, imo.

I get what you're saying and I'm going to utilize this more in the future. But similar to Norweg, I don't think you're properly listening to me either. I saw something I disagreed with and I thought it should be mentioned. I don't think the push against Val has value outside of it just being a push. I found more value in how silly I found the push. Also it's a group discussion. Everyone is a part of it.

To recap:

-I am null on the Val push outside of the value of it being a push.
-I am not trying to double down on my argument because I think I'm right. I'm frustrated because my argument isn't properly heard and I was being belittled so I'm trying to explain what I'm thinking so it can be properly noted by the town. Not to mention I don't townread Norweg outside of this "town block" that's been mentioned, so yes I prodded more.
-I was really interested in Norweg's reaction specifically. I don't see how someone can be so aggressive on a take that has no traction and be seen as town. He said he didn't want a town miselim d1 as if suggesting he was a) confirmed town and b) suggesting he wasn't was an immediate threat to the town is so fucking weird?? I was trying to bring that up in 221, 225, and 234. Val was my secondary focus but because Norweg kept bringing up that as my original post, it kept circling back to Val when Val was! not! my! concern! by the second half of the argument. I was saying that I don't like how you, Norweg, specifically, was responding to my post against you, and you, Norweg, kept bringing it back to my original post when I was trying to expand on my argument that I don't like your response and I didn't think it's pro-town.

Again, this is not me trying to double down on anything. i just really don't like my arguments being misunderstood and I'm trying my best to explain what I'm trying to say.

Cool.
If you don't have a problem with me aside from NAI stuff like: "i just don't like them" then i'm fine ending the discussion on that topic.

In post 255, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Cool.
If you don't have a problem with me aside from NAI stuff like: "i just don't like them" then i'm fine ending the discussion on that topic.

Again not my argument but sure

In post 196, DArby wrote:

In post 177, AliceK wrote:

In post 109, marcistar wrote:

In post 87, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don't wanna see anyone acting stupid this game, or you'll have my unlimited fury poured into destroying you. When I have a solve, you'll LISTEN TO IT.

depends

In post 95, AliceK wrote:VOTE: darby

I don't like his posts.

what dont u like about them

Comment about vig shot sounded fake. Almost like he tried very hard to act as uninformed as possible. This mindset comes from scum.

It’s crazy because this is my first normal game so yes, I am uninformed. Weird read to see ignorance as AI.

scum often fake townslips like that

In post 212, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay this is kinda silly BUT t3 didn't even say hi to me
VOTE: T3
Scared of me?

your avatar is too intimdating
i was quaking in my boots when i saw you replace in

a lot of unreadable banter
usually when that happens it means my reads are incorrect

In post 167, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I think one of the few posts that pinged me as sus earlier is Alice’s: "T3 is being voted a lot, is there an meta reason for that?" post.

In post 168, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The only way to get reads is to keep the very real threat of DEATH hanging over the heads of those that wish to mislead us.

PROVE ME WRONG.

In post 169, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: AliceK

Where is your head at ATM?

I see your point. I agree however I have a gut feeling that T3 is town and we should look somewhere else.

In post 199, marcistar wrote:

alicek

you seem fine enough rn, but

In post 93, AliceK wrote:

In post 19, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Hey Alice, remember that time you asked me if i’d buss both my teammates as scum and i answered no then proceeded to endgame as mafia?


GOOD TIMES~

Haha, very well played. I was suspecting you, but couldn't find good arguments to accuse you. Just hoped I was paranoid. Didn't happen.

do you have any sort of read on norwegianboyee rn..? im curious if anything seems similar to that play you've seen from him, or if you have a townread on him..?

Not much yet. My belief is that people like norwegianboyee you caught in a later stage of the game as they are not doing many mistakes early. Nevertheless, I think in this game he is in "solving" attitude much earlier, so I would say a slight town-lean.

Interesting Darby, Norwegianboy are not svs.

In post 262, AliceK wrote:Interesting Darby, Norwegianboy are not svs.

?
Did you have reason to think it would be?

In post 263, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 262, AliceK wrote:Interesting Darby, Norwegianboy are not svs.

?
Did you have reason to think it would be?

Anyone can be scum and that helps me limit potential mafia teams. An observation for the future.

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

Gut.

Val is basicaly openwolfing at this point so I'm fine with my vote there.
I'd say gamma is the main slot I need to reevaluate.

In post 253, Datisi wrote:

vote count 1.04

with 13 votes in play, it takes 7 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-10-25 14:15:00).

yeet

Val89 [4]:

Gamma Emerald, NorwegianboyEE, T3, marcistar

DArby [2]:

camelCasedSnivy, AliceK

AliceK [1]:

Jolyne

marcistar [1]:

Val89

Not_Mafia [1]:

Not_Mafia

NorwegianboyEE [1]:

DArby

T3 [1]:

Dwlee99

not voting [2]:

redtea, toxictaipan

mod notes

~ everyone has confirmed.

flavour

what the fuck are these wagons

i have a lot of work to do when monday rolls around dont i

In post 258, T3 wrote:

In post 212, Dwlee99 wrote:Okay this is kinda silly BUT t3 didn't even say hi to me
VOTE: T3
Scared of me?

your avatar is too intimdating
i was quaking in my boots when i saw you replace in

Your profile picture says it all...

In post 266, T3 wrote:Val is basicaly openwolfing at this point

Strong statement. Explain?

In post 265, Val89 wrote:VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

Gut.

I'm voting you for an much more elaborate reason than "gut".

If that's the return then i'm not changing my vote.

In post 269, Val89 wrote:

In post 266, T3 wrote:Val is basicaly openwolfing at this point

Strong statement. Explain?

How about you explain why you feel dead on the inside?

Feel dead on the inside? What a strange thing to say.

If that comes from a place of genuine concern, I can assure you I am feeling perfectly well.

val what do u think about the wagon on u..? does anyone seem scummy..?