Mafiascum.net

In post 243, T3 wrote:kill darby

I hate myself but

Why?

In post 246, DArby wrote:UNVOTE:

One more n_m vote and I wouldn’t be surprised if he self hammered.

Why?

In post 250, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 243, T3 wrote:kill darby

I hate myself but

Why?

Well well well, would you look at that, whatever happened to

In post 133, Save The Dragons wrote:only asking why doesn't actually add to discussion

get owned STD

In post 247, DArby wrote:

In post 232, T3 wrote:std town pan lean town the end

Change to pan lean scum and we’d have the same read.

What is scummy about my play thus far?

the whole why wagon was predicated off a policy vote - now that NM is in the game - yall can actually play, no?

Or are we going to just play the game of making d1 a scum freebie when we already likely have 1 less mislim than normal or scum are much stronger than normal.

actually that is a good question: who thinks there are 2 scum and who thinks there are 3?

i started the game in a scummy way in order to try to get read as traitor and see who townreads me in a poor way - i was hoping to hold the discrete test for a bit longer but since wagons are going the way I don't want I am claiming it now.

Did I not fucking say I hate myself

Its pretty obvious what the word only means there

Pan: I acted scummy
Also pan: I'm scum reading the only person who's correctly scumreading me

You sound pretty tilted STD. Are you, perhaps, caught scum?

Yes you got me

being honest about my actions and thought processes should be read as towny, actually.

You were acting scummy to see who tred but the town response was supposed to be tring you?

In post 250, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 243, T3 wrote:kill darby

I hate myself but

Why?

he’s not trying
And ik what he’s saying about the inactivity being nai, I’m not talking about that

How is he not trying

it just doesn't feel like he's got that solving energy

Pan, T3, StD, me

Need 2 more clears and then I'll just chill

In post 251, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 246, DArby wrote:UNVOTE:

One more n_m vote and I wouldn’t be surprised if he self hammered.

Why?

Why what? Why would I not be surprised if you self hammered?

In post 259, Save The Dragons wrote:Pan: I acted scummy
Also pan: I'm scum reading the only person who's correctly scumreading me

I had to read those posts a few times myself. Fucking wild.

In post 254, Pan Smierc wrote:

In post 247, DArby wrote:

In post 232, T3 wrote:std town pan lean town the end

Change to pan lean scum and we’d have the same read.

What is scummy about my play thus far?

In post 256, Pan Smierc wrote:i started the game in a scummy way in order to try to get read as traitor and see who townreads me in a poor way - i was hoping to hold the discrete test for a bit longer but since wagons are going the way I don't want I am claiming it now.

I’m not even going to make an argument.

In post 80, ben dover123 wrote:Pan towny

cookie scummy

We don't need to policy Why because he isn't negatively impacting thread health.

Why is egix towny?

Everyone should post their reads because it only feels like Pan, T3 and I are interacting with the thread.

I'll explain stuff soon.

When did Pan become town to you? You say this with a vote on their slot.

In post 255, Pan Smierc wrote:the whole why wagon was predicated off a policy vote - now that NM is in the game - yall can actually play, no?

Or are we going to just play the game of making d1 a scum freebie when we already likely have 1 less mislim than normal or scum are much stronger than normal.

Why do you keep assuming that the NM slot is town?

In post 264, T3 wrote:

In post 250, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 243, T3 wrote:kill darby

I hate myself but

Why?

he’s not trying
And ik what he’s saying about the inactivity being nai, I’m not talking about that

In post 266, T3 wrote:it just doesn't feel like he's got that solving energy

Does his recent posting make any difference?