Page 11 of 49

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 4:00 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 246, redtea wrote:uh legit though, I counted and isn't gamma supposed to be dead?

@mod can you recount the votes again? Pretty sure gamma was hammered
If this is the case 100% kill off enchant and redtea at first opportunity

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 4:08 pm
by MegAzumarill
Gamma isn't hammered.

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 5:59 pm
by redtea
I DIDNT MEAB TO OKAY

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 6:04 pm
by redtea
OOOoooh you're right, Roden switched off to vote me
talk about clutch

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 6:12 pm
by Enchant
In post 250, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 246, redtea wrote:uh legit though, I counted and isn't gamma supposed to be dead?

@mod can you recount the votes again? Pretty sure gamma was hammered
If this is the case 100% kill off enchant and redtea at first opportunity
"I am deserved to be quickhammered"
@ Gamma


You still do.

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 6:46 pm
by redtea
You do too tbh

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 6:47 pm
by redtea
and mozamis

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 7:38 pm
by Enchant
In post 255, redtea wrote:You do too tbh
no u

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 8:33 pm
by Egix96
In post 236, numberQ wrote:
In post 231, Egix96 wrote:
In post 213, Not_Mafia wrote:Someone put Q on E-1 please
Eh, I feel like his reaction to being wagoned was slightly more towny than not. I'm curious as to why he leans scum on me though, and also Roden implicitly agreeing.
My read on you was pretty much entirely based on your 166. I'm not seeing the throughline of logic or emotion for you to land on a vote for redtea or TRs for Roden/Meg. Which to me smells like scum trying to fake reads.

More recently, I don't like 235. Gamma ultimately
wasn't
yeeted, which I think is much more telling than
almost
getting yeeted. (not you, Almost :P )

Egix, do you have any opinions on Enchant getting pissed off by his wagon? I have thoughts but I'd like to hear yours first.
Yes, I am totally going to post exactly how I'm feeling at every step /s. This is why reading people based on "progression" is often flawed.

Regarding Enchant, I really don't mean to sound insensitive by saying this, but I don't feel like he's actually that peed off? I mean, otherwise he wouldn't be joking about anime/weebs, and what else would he expect his scumreads to do apart from pushing back against him?

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 9:39 pm
by Enchant
In post 258, Egix96 wrote:
In post 236, numberQ wrote:
In post 231, Egix96 wrote:
In post 213, Not_Mafia wrote:Someone put Q on E-1 please
Eh, I feel like his reaction to being wagoned was slightly more towny than not. I'm curious as to why he leans scum on me though, and also Roden implicitly agreeing.
My read on you was pretty much entirely based on your 166. I'm not seeing the throughline of logic or emotion for you to land on a vote for redtea or TRs for Roden/Meg. Which to me smells like scum trying to fake reads.

More recently, I don't like 235. Gamma ultimately
wasn't
yeeted, which I think is much more telling than
almost
getting yeeted. (not you, Almost :P )

Egix, do you have any opinions on Enchant getting pissed off by his wagon? I have thoughts but I'd like to hear yours first.
Yes, I am totally going to post exactly how I'm feeling at every step /s. This is why reading people based on "progression" is often flawed.

Regarding Enchant, I really don't mean to sound insensitive by saying this, but I don't feel like he's actually that peed off? I mean, otherwise he wouldn't be joking about anime/weebs, and what else would he expect his scumreads to do apart from pushing back against him?

I am not joking, that's pure truth.

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:16 pm
by redtea
So what?
You think scum jebaited you into quasi-hammering so that they could dogpile you?

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:24 pm
by Enchant
In post 260, redtea wrote:So what?
You think scum jebaited you into quasi-hammering so that they could dogpile you?
Perhaps. Truly masterminds.

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:27 pm
by Not_Mafia
Did someone say hammer?

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:22 am
by T3
Vc

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:28 am
by Galron
In post 230, Roden wrote:
In post 222, Galron wrote:
In post 220, Roden wrote:
In post 180, numberQ wrote:Early reads, in order from towniest to scummiest:

Town:
Roden
Penguin

Leantown:
A50
ssbm
redtea
Gamma

Null:
Galron
mozamis
Not_Mafia

Leanscum:
Enchant
Egix
Meg

Scum:
numberQ

I can elaborate on any of these if asked but I'm not going to elaborate on all of them right now, too much work.
I'm vibing with this reads list for the most part.

Why are you town reading Penguin?
If you take money from these people under false pretenses, you’ll be committing fraud.

VOTE: roden
VOTE: Galron

Ok, let's figure each other out. Are these serious votes? If so, why do you scum read me?
Start with the misdemeanors and then, we're gonna' push right on through to the lighter treasons:
In post 172, Roden wrote:Ughhhh...I'm gonna have to keep pushing discussion, aren't I?
In post 173, Roden wrote:
In post 170, MegAzumarill wrote:
In post 166, Egix96 wrote:
In post 99, redtea wrote:
In post 86, numberQ wrote:
In post 82, redtea wrote:I'm gonna unvote before this turns into a Thing
UNVOTE:
Considering no other things have happened or are happening, I say thing it up. Why is your vote better off the wagon than on it?
I'm trying to be a
little
more selective in my thinging
In post 100, redtea wrote:VOTE: gamma

that's me, being selective
Come on, that had to have been deliberate.

VOTE: redtea
In post 133, Enchant wrote:
In post 132, Roden wrote:
In post 130, Enchant wrote:
In post 128, Roden wrote:Also Enchant wtf are you doing
I wanted quickhammer, but changed mind when noticed Mag was upset, and decided to hold for now.
Ok, but why do you want a quick hammer? And why is Meg posting emojis enough to stop you from quick hammering?
Why not?

Idk, honestly. Seems like i turned in wimp with high empathy when i am sleepy. Mostly i really don't care.

Why i am not sleeping?

Weeeeeeell! I need to go now seems.
This is also terrible.

Side note: Roden is prob town for actually having common sense around the whole quickhammer situation, and also Azumarill to a lesser extent.
TMI that me and Roden are town?
Somewhat agree with this. Shutting down early quick hammers is low effort town cred for scum, and doesn't even consider the possibility that Gamma could be my buddy and that I was trying to save him. That shouldn't really be seen as town indicative.

Egix, do you have a read on Gamma?
In post 174, Roden wrote:
In post 97, mozamis wrote:ok, sorry, didnt realise game had started, catching up, ty :)
It's been a day, and not much has happened since this post. Are you caught up yet? Do you have any opinions?

It is exactly the opposite:
In post 178, Roden wrote:
In post 176, Galron wrote:VOTE: roden
I get that you're gimmicking this game, but it's obscuring your thought process. Can you explain your votes?
In post 219, Roden wrote:That's E-2/E-NM btw.

What's up Enchant? Do you have any reads?

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:30 am
by Enchant
Let's try actually one tactic from wiki. Like what we lose?

Example:
If i am Role Oracle/Role Cop, i targeted Egix96 last night and found them as Vanilla.
If i am Parity Cop, i targeted Galron last night.
If i am N0 Cop, then ssbm_Kyouko is Innocent, as well as Galron.

If am other role (Roleblocker/Doctor/Jailkeeper/Bodyguard/Tracker) i used my ability on Gamma Emerald last night, but anything important didn't happen.
If i am Vanilla, disregard that.



If everyone fill this, then PR can leave "crumbs" without being painly obvious? Everyone should make effort to actually make it belivable though.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:20 am
by numberQ
Hmm. I kind of see the utility in doing that. But I also see at least one situation where this will just out a PR, particularly cops. If a non-cop and a cop both target someone who is widely SRed, then the non-cop is essentially forced to claim a guilty verdict as part of this smokescreen strategy. Because if they claim innocent, their SR will have to change to a TR, otherwise they're admitting that they are not the cop and the whole strategy is useless. But if the targeted player actually is town, then the real cop will have to claim an innocent result, otherwise the breadcrumb is useless. Which pretty much outs them as the cop.

Might be more examples of how this outs PRs, haven't sat down and thought through every possible scenario.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:38 am
by Enchant
Then "check" person who you actually townread. Considering Cops need to check actual nullreads, it makes sense.

Giving "Guilty" results is a kind of stupid, because you probably should speak up anyway... Or get them killed otherwise.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:39 am
by Enchant
Basically just faking it, before real invest claims Guilty result, after that we consider our work done.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 7:31 am
by Enchant
We have two days. Ding ding.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:03 am
by T3


Votecount:
  • Enchant (2): Almost50, ssbm_Kyouko
    Galron (2): Roden, Gamma Emerald
    Gamma Emerald (2): MegAzumarill, Not_Mafia
    numberQ (1): PenguinPower
    Not_Mafia (1): mozamis
    MegAzumarill (1): numberQ
    redtea (1): Egix96
    Roden (1): Galron
I'm doing VC's by hand, please tell me if there are any errors.
Day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-11-10 07:56:01).
With 13 alive it takes 7 to eliminate.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:34 am
by Almost50
It looks like this will be a low-effort low-posting game

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:43 am
by numberQ
VOTE: Enchant

Biggest wagon right now, and he's on the bottom half of my reads list already. If discussion is stagnating I feel like we should at least keep up the vote momentum.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:48 am
by T3
Prodding PenguinPower.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:12 am
by redtea
@Galron
Roden feels a lot like Deimos did in the first game I played with him. He got rushlimmed d1 for his weird (and similar here) tone and flipped town.

That's to say, some leeway should be given. Tone won't be a reliable way to read him imo

And if it's not that you're talking about then uuuuh I have no idea what you're talking about