Page 11 of 39

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:03 pm
by Nero Cain
Vote Count 1.7
Image


Panda fact #8:The WWF has been around since 1961 and uses the panda on its logo.



[5]momo:
Cat Scratch Fever, MegAzumarill, Greeting, Vanderscamp, wavemode
[3]Toogeloo:
Dwlee99, Roden, MathBlade
[1]MathBlade:
JacksonVirgo
[1]Roden:
momo
[1]Cat Scratch Fever:
StrangeMatter


Not Voting (2):
Toogeloo, Malakittens


With 13 alive, it's 7 to eliminate.



Deadline for Day 1 is Wednesday, March 9th at 4:00 am CST.


Deadline Timer:
(expired on 2022-03-10 05:00:00)

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:09 pm
by Vanderscamp
I like what dwlee and Roden are saying to toog on page 9

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:15 pm
by Malakittens
In post 200, MathBlade wrote:
In post 199, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh. That's not how I read it. Cause toog's content is even making an attempt at being game advancing and there's a lot of it compared to small from momo and something is there.
I disagree with that.

How is lolcat advancing the game? Looks like active lurking to me.
Who is lolcat

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:17 pm
by Vanderscamp
In post 243, Toogeloo wrote:
In post 241, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:What's your read on momo, by the way?
Momo is in the game?
Is this a troll?

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:18 pm
by Vanderscamp
In post 252, Malakittens wrote:
In post 200, MathBlade wrote:
In post 199, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh. That's not how I read it. Cause toog's content is even making an attempt at being game advancing and there's a lot of it compared to small from momo and something is there.
I disagree with that.

How is lolcat advancing the game? Looks like active lurking to me.
Who is lolcat
I'm assuming toog.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:30 pm
by MathBlade
Lolcatting is a verb. It’s more treating everything like a joke. I am bad at explaining subjective things

“A humorous picture of a feline, accompanied with a witty caption intended to create laughter.” That’s the literal definition from urban dictionary

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:35 pm
by Malakittens
I mean you didn’t have to go further cuz I would have understood the first paragraph:(:(

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:03 pm
by momo
My bad y'all, been active af pretty much everywhere online.

So, there's a wagon on me...

I mean I get it, scum likes to lurk early, but also it's not a real wagon at all?

This is maybe my fourth post in this game, you have literally no reason to town or scum read me lol considering that the first few pages of a game are just RVS.
In post 107, momo wrote:Think dw would have moved off toog if scum, liked mala's interactions on page 4.

Think there must have been one scum at least out of the five people on the toog wagon (based on how quick it moved), immediate objective should be sorting there.
People saying this is scummy because I'm trying to pretend to "solve" while not saying anything specific are wild.

I acknowledge that I didn't say anything specific. It was page 4 for crying out loud. If anyone claims to have solved a mafia game by page 4, they're full of shit.

I thought it was a good place to start and that's it.

Not everything is a solve.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:06 pm
by momo
In post 122, MegAzumarill wrote:
In post 121, MegAzumarill wrote:VOTE: Momo

First serious wagon of the game should be here
Only 3 posts so far (which is NAI) but 1 is an rvs vote, 1 gives lamist vibes, and the other feels like poor logic because it wasn't reasoned out and was just wanting to look solvey.
EBWOP
Like this is such poor logic I actually can't even. What kind of way do you play mafia where you expect clear and concrete evidence less than 100 posts into the game? My post was calling to attention five people I wanted to look into AS THE DAY PROGRESSED. I wasn't calling for any of them to be lim-ed immediately or saying that I solved the game.

I'll be the first to admit that I'm rarely confident in Day 1 reads. Until you have some level of VCA/flips for information, it's all really a crapshoot.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 5:16 pm
by MegAzumarill
My issue doesn't come from the content of your posts (or lack thereof) It deals with more of how you presented the posts tthemselves.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:51 pm
by Vanderscamp
In post 257, momo wrote:My bad y'all, been active af pretty much everywhere online.

So, there's a wagon on me...

I mean I get it, scum likes to lurk early, but also it's not a real wagon at all?

This is maybe my fourth post in this game, you have literally no reason to town or scum read me lol considering that the first few pages of a game are just RVS.
In post 107, momo wrote:Think dw would have moved off toog if scum, liked mala's interactions on page 4.

Think there must have been one scum at least out of the five people on the toog wagon (based on how quick it moved), immediate objective should be sorting there.
People saying this is scummy because I'm trying to pretend to "solve" while not saying anything specific are wild.

I acknowledge that I didn't say anything specific. It was page 4 for crying out loud. If anyone claims to have solved a mafia game by page 4, they're full of shit.

I thought it was a good place to start and that's it.

Not everything is a solve.
Responding to the bold:
I'm scumreading you for your analysis post.
Was your analysis RVS?...


No one is claiming you need to have solved the game by page 4 and I don't think anyone has said that as a reason for suspecting you.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 6:52 pm
by Vanderscamp
Momo: do you have any thoughts among the five people from the wagon?

Are you still interested in looking there or do you have an updated perspective?

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 8:38 pm
by MathBlade
Gonna be busy with work
Toog Momo is looking more likely and my momo initial read may be wrong.
Happy with either
Their posts after prod are underwhelming

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 7:57 am
by wavemode
In post 251, Vanderscamp wrote:I like what dwlee and Roden are saying to toog on page 9
what did you like about them

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:49 am
by Greeting
In post 194, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 193, Greeting wrote:
In post 191, Dwlee99 wrote:I really want toog flipped but Momo isn't the worst vote
Why?
Toog - lolcat, Momo - frog's TMI thingy about the wagon
In post 198, MathBlade wrote:I read Greeting’s question as why Toog more than momo. Can you answer that please?
In post 199, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh. That's not how I read it. Cause toog's content is even making an attempt at being game advancing and there's a lot of it compared to small from momo and something is there.
MathBlade
read it correctly. Thanks for answering.

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:52 am
by Greeting
In post 200, MathBlade wrote:
In post 199, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh. That's not how I read it. Cause toog's content is even making an attempt at being game advancing and there's a lot of it compared to small from momo and something is there.
I disagree with that.

How is lolcat advancing the game? Looks like active lurking to me.
Toogeloo
just kinda does that. It's NAI in my opinon.

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:55 am
by Greeting
In post 215, Malakittens wrote:
In post 190, Greeting wrote:
momo
should have been prodded by now.

Still has time on the prodder

Ewww.
I'm allergic to cat fur. My eyeballs turn red and my skin gets itchy. Which is a shame, because cats are kinda cute.

Image

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 9:58 am
by Greeting
momo
, whom would be your primary choice to vote out at this stage of the game?

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 10:02 am
by Cat Scratch Fever
Strange, you haven't commented on either of the major wagons. Penny for your thoughts?

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:22 pm
by Vanderscamp
In post 263, wavemode wrote:
In post 251, Vanderscamp wrote:I like what dwlee and Roden are saying to toog on page 9
what did you like about them
A level of effort in trying to work with someone who is seemingly defeated / not trying that I don't think is necessary as scum

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:24 pm
by Vanderscamp
I really want to kill momo if that's all they had to say.
There was a good amount of content that went into defending themselves but zero game analysis.

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 1:59 pm
by Roden
In post 231, Toogeloo wrote:People are fooling themselves if they think this day is salvageable without eliminating me.
In post 232, Toogeloo wrote:Just go into the night phase with your PRs while no one else has given an inkling of power, and try to fix it tomorrow.
This only hurts town if you're town, we won't gain any info from your flip. You're claiming we'll be able to gain info from people's stances on you pre-flip, but if everyone is voting you because you're asking to be eliminated then nobody will have a legitimate stance on you. This also spews you as Vanilla/low power, so now you won't be NK'd either if we don't vote you.

I think you know this though, because you didn't answer when I asked who you thought was scummy, and you currently aren't voting anyone.

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 2:02 pm
by Roden
VOTE: Momo E-1

Just gonna go back here. A certain post pinged, gonna try to dig it back up before my break ends.

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 2:13 pm
by MathBlade
Intent

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 2:15 pm
by Roden
In post 257, momo wrote:My bad y'all, been active af pretty much everywhere online.

So, there's a wagon on me...

I mean I get it, scum likes to lurk early, but also it's not a real wagon at all?

This is maybe my fourth post in this game, you have literally no reason to town or scum read me lol considering that the first few pages of a game are just RVS.
In post 107, momo wrote:Think dw would have moved off toog if scum, liked mala's interactions on page 4.

Think there must have been one scum at least out of the five people on the toog wagon (based on how quick it moved), immediate objective should be sorting there.
People saying this is scummy because I'm trying to pretend to "solve" while not saying anything specific are wild.

I acknowledge that I didn't say anything specific. It was page 4 for crying out loud. If anyone claims to have solved a mafia game by page 4, they're full of shit.

I thought it was a good place to start and that's it.

Not everything is a solve.
So besides this reading as "caught for the wrong reasons", he's saying he can't be accurately read yet because all of his previous posts were during RVS and he shouldn't be expected to have a solve yet. However, his push on me did not look like RVS as time went on.
In post 8, momo wrote:VOTE: Roden

Naked voting in RVS? What do you have to hide?
Sure, this is a perfectly reasonable RVS post. I'm not being sarcastic, this one is fine.
In post 42, momo wrote:
In post 37, Roden wrote:VOTE: Toog
This is the fifth vote on Toog. Bringing someone to L-2 on post 37 without so much as a comment (even just one saying that it's L-2) is not the best look.
Yeah, this definitely isn't RVS. He is very clearly trying to argue that I'm being scummy.

So he wants to claim his posts were just RVS and that reading him off of those is a bad idea. Yet he only has one post that could be accurately labeled as RVS, and instead was already trying to make a serious push on page 2.