Mafiascum.net

In post 242, SirCakez wrote:

In post 131, NashedPotato wrote:Can we just not delve into setup spec when we have literally zero information as a whole.

Pretty sure Nero is town

In post 249, ItalianoVD wrote:but I've seen enough that I'm comfortable with nero!scum.

In post 171, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 160, KittyTacky wrote:So 13:3 isn't tilted in town's favor? I don't understand what's BS here. Kinda sketchy NGL.

Correct. 13:3 Mountainous isn't tilted in town's favor. It's scumsided.

In post 173, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 7, over90 wrote:I'm a traitor
VOTE: over90

Why did you do this?

In post 251, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 249, ItalianoVD wrote:but I've seen enough that I'm comfortable with nero!scum.

Why did you not answer my question?

In post 250, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 242, SirCakez wrote:

In post 131, NashedPotato wrote:Can we just not delve into setup spec when we have literally zero information as a whole.

Pretty sure Nero is town

Can you elaborate why?

In post 124, Nero Cain wrote:and yet you didn't vote me until I voted you. If you found my posting scummy prior to 58 why not call me out?

In post 222, DeasVail wrote:A big part of why I think Kitty could be scum is the way that they have responded to suspicion in this game. When one is scum, the question of how to respond to a vote/suspicion is, I think, a pretty tricky one, and something that a lot of players as scum will have to intentionally think about, and I think Kitty's responses align with scum feeling the need to respond in a certain way, rather than a natural town response.

The first example of this is here:

In post 100, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 26, mq.bosco wrote:VOTE: KittyTacky

You're making a terrible mistake, I'm Jester.

Which would be a pretty harmless joke on its own, and at first I didn't think anything of it, but then it is a lot more pronounced in 139

Statements like "Do you really expect me to try to case you on page 6? I don't case people this early." don't actually match what Nero was asking, and make out Nero to be unreasonable.

How does it not match, and yes it was unreasonable to shade me for not wanting to case early.

And "The cardinal sin of waiting for more posts from a player before seeing whether to commit to a read or not." - is an insistence that what Kitty is doing is totally reasonable and shouldn't be suspected, again that any suspicion of Kitty is unsubstantiated (though note that in this case RCE didn't even provide a reason for thinking that Kitty was scum).

Because I am town and FMPOV suspecting me is unreasonable.

So instead of being confident in their role PM being town, Kitty feels the need to essentially belittle any suspicion against them, even when the suspicion itself is quite trivial and low-impact.

This contradicts your previous point.

--

I also don't like the Nero thing, as I don't really believe that they truly have that read.

Well I do so it's your word versus mine.

--

over90, I would like to know why you townread Kitty.

PEdit: Tbf carcalilly, no one was actually shading kitty for not casing early. That was a narrative that Kitty themselves created.

The 3 votes on me say otherwise.

In post 224, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 160, KittyTacky wrote:2. What's wrong with just being somewhat cautious this early?

I think early game is the best time to not be cautious and it looks like you just know I'm town that is afraid to vote me. I mean maybe I can understand that you are suspicious of me but that suspicion hasn't formed into a full on scum read yet but still seems iffy to me.

Last game I pushed several people early and they were all town. I don't want to repeat my mistakes.

what did you like about VD's case?

It felt townish on gut and your play does actually feel different this game to me now that he pointed it out.

In post 162, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 157, Nero Cain wrote:and now your case is that I haven't done enough.

Wrong.

In post 154, ItalianoVD wrote:Even though there hasn't been much of anything in this game so far, I feel town!you would've done more by now.

is this not a change in reasoning? I mean maybe you could argue that it's something you are adding onto your meta case but I think that's BS. I think that no one was bitting on your meta case so you threw out some charged wording that I wasn't doing enough. I think I'm doing plenty.

Gamma Emerald wrote:do you do the response in bold thing a lot?

In post 258, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 245, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 240, takotsubo syndrome wrote:I never said I read the game for meta. I also never said I metadived you. So let’s not get too carried away with putting words in my mouth or twisting my thoughts.

I just said it felt off in terms of you casing NC very early.

In post 261, KittyTacky wrote:Last game I pushed several people early and they were all town. I don't want to repeat my mistakes.

In post 265, DeasVail wrote:Kitty, nowhere has anyone said that they are voting you because you didn’t case Nero.

Why do you still claim this?

In post 266, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 265, DeasVail wrote:Kitty, nowhere has anyone said that they are voting you because you didn’t case Nero.

Why do you still claim this?

Well it came across this way. Elaborate why you think my response to pressure is scummy.

In post 196, Gamma Emerald wrote:just feels a bit weird you thought to check his old games but only checked 2 of them

In post 243, SirCakez wrote:Ignore that Nashed quote my phone has a bug

In post 179, takotsubo syndrome wrote:

In post 169, Gamma Emerald wrote:why was your only comment to bring up something someone else mentioned?

I mean I really didn't have much to comment on while catching up. Majority of what has been posted looks like it's been in jest aka the traitor/jester/mason claim.
This just very serious in like a very jokey time & felt very off.

This is such a scum thing to post

VOTE: takotsubo

In post 269, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why were you reading them, then?

In post 263, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 245, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 240, takotsubo syndrome wrote:I never said I read the game for meta. I also never said I metadived you. So let’s not get too carried away with putting words in my mouth or twisting my thoughts.

I just said it felt off in terms of you casing NC very early.

Yeah that post is just gross. VOTE: takotsubo syndrome

In post 243, SirCakez wrote:Ignore that Nashed quote my phone has a bug

In post 179, takotsubo syndrome wrote:

In post 169, Gamma Emerald wrote:why was your only comment to bring up something someone else mentioned?

I mean I really didn't have much to comment on while catching up. Majority of what has been posted looks like it's been in jest aka the traitor/jester/mason claim.
This just very serious in like a very jokey time & felt very off.

This is such a scum thing to post

VOTE: takotsubo