Mafiascum.net

In post 246, Enchant wrote:Meta sucks though

It does but it's there whether we like it or not

I object to this Titus wagon, I don't know why ENTchant and Scrrrdbear are indulging this vanity push by Don Draper x MisTREES

Titus is just rude town I think, which can be frustrating but yeah

My current thoughts:

Evergreen

: ENTchant, Don Draper x MisTREES

Showing signs of foliage

: Scrrrdbear, Titus, Vanderscamp

No leaves here, could be a tree or an arsonist in a brown jumpsuit

: Herta, Ircher, Porkens

We're back on!

Due to the recent site downtime, I will extend the Day deadline by 3 days.

I also will not issue prods for the next 3 days, after which I will prod anyone who did not post within the previous 36 hours.

It is lovely to see the site back up!

VOTE: Bear

If we aren't limming the whining player, then let's go after the sheep stirring up drama and sneaking his vote.

In post 256, Titus wrote:VOTE: Bear

If we aren't limming the whining player, then let's go after the sheep stirring up drama and sneaking his vote.

Don't like this

In post 257, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 256, Titus wrote:VOTE: Bear

If we aren't limming the whining player, then let's go after the sheep stirring up drama and sneaking his vote.

Don't like this

Don't care. I have been called rude and ignorant for stating my observations. I'll check my work my way.

Scum will favor lurker pushes here. Lurkers are more likely to give up if miseliminated. Only if scum can't get a lurker will they push active people. Hence why I FoS Bear there.

In post 259, Titus wrote:Scum will favor lurker pushes here. Lurkers are more likely to give up if miseliminated. Only if scum can't get a lurker will they push active people. Hence why I FoS Bear there.

Do you think Scrrrdbear 'couldn't get' Enchant/Porkens? I'm still voting Porkens

In post 254, furtiveglance wrote:We're back on!

I was worried it was just on my end!

In post 256, Titus wrote:VOTE: Bear

If we aren't limming the whining player, then let's go after the sheep stirring up drama and sneaking his vote.

Why?

Whew finally.

Ent chant and herta are the least townie to me right now because of their lack of content.

It's interesting we have same thoughts, i also townread Enchant

Entchant always has low content. What's the difference here Porkens?

We're all here. Thoughts on my treedlist (readlist)?

Can you quote it for me?

In post 265, Ircher wrote:Entchant always has low content. What's the difference here Porkens?

CHARISMA

In post 260, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 259, Titus wrote:Scum will favor lurker pushes here. Lurkers are more likely to give up if miseliminated. Only if scum can't get a lurker will they push active people. Hence why I FoS Bear there.

Do you think Scrrrdbear 'couldn't get' Enchant/Porkens? I'm still voting Porkens

Not without yelling and dominating. There's also the fact that Enchant is obvtown. Do you really expect Bear to be able to push a case where little to no evidence exists and there's meta evidence for town Enchant?

Porkens might be an easier sell but still would require a dramatic shift.

Third, hard pushing a lurker might draw them to play. Scum want lurkers to lurk.

In post 250, Vanderscamp wrote:

In post 246, Enchant wrote:Meta sucks though

It does but it's there whether we like it or not

This. You even used it to townread me.

In post 256, Titus wrote:VOTE: Bear

If we aren't limming the whining player, then let's go after the sheep stirring up drama and sneaking his vote.

If this is referring to me, the “whining” player, I’m going to very respectfully ask you to not engage in personal attacks, especially since you have refused to engage with any of my reasoning. I think it’s possible we have have possibly have a difference of opinion wrt to what an RVS vote is supposed to look like. I not too recently in a game received 3 votes based on activity in Turing test: 2 town/1 scum, so I do tend to either omguss activity votes or get pissed off. If that was actually a non-serious vote then maybe we misunderstood each other.

I did not interpret is as an RVS vote. I thought you were seriously sr me for not doing enough to obvtown and that’s why I mocked your read on me. The fact that Vanders also interpreted your vote as an RVS vote caused me to question this.

So did I in fact misinterpret an RVS vote as serious? Because that might be at the root of all of this. I am pretty much guaranteed to interpret anything that looks like a push based on my activity as scum indicative but if I misconstrued it, then maybe I jumped to some wrong conclusions.

I also was suss on the whole tree thing as well but it was the combo mostly. At any rate, I would greatly appreciate checking your attitude towards me, thanks.

~Nancy

In post 269, Titus wrote:

In post 260, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 259, Titus wrote:Scum will favor lurker pushes here. Lurkers are more likely to give up if miseliminated. Only if scum can't get a lurker will they push active people. Hence why I FoS Bear there.

Do you think Scrrrdbear 'couldn't get' Enchant/Porkens? I'm still voting Porkens

Not without yelling and dominating. There's also the fact that Enchant is obvtown. Do you really expect Bear to be able to push a case where little to no evidence exists and there's meta evidence for town Enchant?

Porkens might be an easier sell but still would require a dramatic shift.

Third, hard pushing a lurker might draw them to play. Scum want lurkers to lurk.

I like this post.

In post 253, furtiveglance wrote:My current thoughts:

Evergreen

: ENTchant, Don Draper x MisTREES

Showing signs of foliage

: Scrrrdbear, Titus, Vanderscamp

No leaves here, could be a tree or an arsonist in a brown jumpsuit

: Herta, Ircher, Porkens

I would include you in Evergreen.

I think that’s a pretty reason assessment.

:

DD x M
furtive
Enchant
Vanders
Titus

Sccrbear

Herta
Ircher
Porkens

I enjoyed your phrasing.