In post 24, Gamma Emerald wrote:But for real, either stop with the targeting or explain yourself
Well as i said i won't vote any of "masons" today for sure.
I also won't vote Rosen.
There's also specific members which i don't want to vote for example NM (also how NM and ... Which this one they both sumbitted 14 together i forgot nickname whatever)
OF GAMMA/DANNFLOR + PENGUIN/JOHNNY/KITTY ARE SCUM. IF THIS DRAFT SYSTEM HAS BEEN RUN BEFORE I'D LOVE TO SEE WHAT NUMBERS WERE CHOSEN BY SCUM IN THE PAST.
Wait what
Where you get this idea from, why scum would pick same number as teammates
In post 17, Gamma Emerald wrote:Enchant has some vague nondescript beef with me, I would rather he actually speak his mind rather than just target me nonsensically
In post 100, Yume wrote:Stealth hi bye
I got the role I wanted
What a ballsy intro I love it
_
In post 103, KittyTacky wrote:Yeah I feel like scum might very well have picked whatever would confuse town the most.
On top of that with the variable nature of this setup I'm sure I could come up with a reason why scum would pick every single option on this board
_
In post 112, KittyTacky wrote:I played a bunch with GE as both alignments and he usually isn't this... I don't know what it is I see in his posts but it's weird.
Gamma's big mad lately.
_
In post 126, northsidegal wrote:what's your interpretation of NK15's one post? do you think it's just NAI?
You didn't ask me this but solely popping in to push back on a townread seems more scummy than townie.
_
Lol porky agrees
_
In post 143, Dannflor wrote:in fact i think the process is like very marginally town indicative for nsg even though i disagree
I agree with this whole post
_
In post 161, JunkoChan wrote:By the way i'm usually more inclined to lynch more quiet people day 1 so I'm okay with Yume nk15 or not_mafia too at this point, might change my mind tho
@Junko
- do you review your posts before you submit them? Or do you just play more off the dome?
_
In post 243, Roden wrote:NM making exactly one post and then fucking off means he probably isn't having fun. Which could mean he can't troll anyone in a scum PT, so slight +town.
This is the best way to read NM I've ever encountered
Dannflor playing straight man to this whole clown thread is fun to read.
On Gamma vs. everybody: I'm just not feeling Gamma's wagon. I don't trust Bear or Junko atm, pengy is always a question mark. On top of that I don't know what is happening with Gamma lately but they seem troubled and it's coming through as aggressive exasperation over and over again in games lately. It's NAI and honestly hard to read around.
I'll basically vote Enchant whenever, they're a hard read.
Those are my thoughts off the dome. AMA
Johnny gets to be town for longer than a lot of the rest of you.
In post 17, Gamma Emerald wrote:Enchant has some vague nondescript beef with me, I would rather he actually speak his mind rather than just target me nonsensically
In post 100, Yume wrote:Stealth hi bye
I got the role I wanted
What a ballsy intro I love it
_
In post 103, KittyTacky wrote:Yeah I feel like scum might very well have picked whatever would confuse town the most.
On top of that with the variable nature of this setup I'm sure I could come up with a reason why scum would pick every single option on this board
_
In post 112, KittyTacky wrote:I played a bunch with GE as both alignments and he usually isn't this... I don't know what it is I see in his posts but it's weird.
Gamma's big mad lately.
_
In post 126, northsidegal wrote:what's your interpretation of NK15's one post? do you think it's just NAI?
You didn't ask me this but solely popping in to push back on a townread seems more scummy than townie.
_
Lol porky agrees
_
In post 143, Dannflor wrote:in fact i think the process is like very marginally town indicative for nsg even though i disagree
I agree with this whole post
_
In post 161, JunkoChan wrote:By the way i'm usually more inclined to lynch more quiet people day 1 so I'm okay with Yume nk15 or not_mafia too at this point, might change my mind tho
@Junko
- do you review your posts before you submit them? Or do you just play more off the dome?
_
In post 243, Roden wrote:NM making exactly one post and then fucking off means he probably isn't having fun. Which could mean he can't troll anyone in a scum PT, so slight +town.
This is the best way to read NM I've ever encountered
Dannflor playing straight man to this whole clown thread is fun to read.
On Gamma vs. everybody: I'm just not feeling Gamma's wagon. I don't trust Bear or Junko atm, pengy is always a question mark. On top of that I don't know what is happening with Gamma lately but they seem troubled and it's coming through as aggressive exasperation over and over again in games lately. It's NAI and honestly hard to read around.
I'll basically vote Enchant whenever, they're a hard read.
Those are my thoughts off the dome. AMA
thanks for joining in, sometimes I do, sometimes I don't, if you see any typo in my post I probably just wrote it and pushed the button, I often pedit my post too, if anything in the new posts changes my thoughts
In post 24, Gamma Emerald wrote:But for real, either stop with the targeting or explain yourself
Well as i said i won't vote any of "masons" today for sure.
I also won't vote Rosen.
There's also specific members which i don't want to vote for example NM (also how NM and ... Which this one they both sumbitted 14 together i forgot nickname whatever)
OF GAMMA/DANNFLOR + PENGUIN/JOHNNY/KITTY ARE SCUM. IF THIS DRAFT SYSTEM HAS BEEN RUN BEFORE I'D LOVE TO SEE WHAT NUMBERS WERE CHOSEN BY SCUM IN THE PAST.
Wait what
Where you get this idea from, why scum would pick same number as teammates
Me too NGL, the Gamma case feels a little forced. Intent to vote once I finish my backread.
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 4:35 pm
by KittyTacky
The sudden back-off just feels wrong too.
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 4:40 pm
by KittyTacky
VOTE: Porkens
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 4:40 pm
by JohnnyFarrar
So Junko, you were calling out inactives in 161 and I wasn't on the list, but Yume and NK were.
(I would argue that they had a decent amount of content in each of their posts, though granted they each only had one. Meanwhile I hadn't posted anything of consequense, and I would argue that -despite their post count- penguin and Enchant hadn't really posted any readable content either.)
BUT THEN, you later posted another lurker list that did have me on it in 227
Whyyyyyyy
I've come to one potential conclusion here but I'd like to hear it from you
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 4:41 pm
by JohnnyFarrar
Kitty talk to me about Porkens when you're done reading, I haven't quite landed on an opinion there
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 4:52 pm
by KittyTacky
In post 263, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Kitty talk to me about Porkens when you're done reading, I haven't quite landed on an opinion there
The case on Gamma gave me terrible vibes. Then they suddenly jumped off despite seeming pretty convinced.
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 5:01 pm
by JunkoChan
In post 262, JohnnyFarrar wrote:So Junko, you were calling out inactives in 161 and I wasn't on the list, but Yume and NK were.
(I would argue that they had a decent amount of content in each of their posts, though granted they each only had one. Meanwhile I hadn't posted anything of consequense, and I would argue that -despite their post count- penguin and Enchant hadn't really posted any readable content either.)
BUT THEN, you later posted another lurker list that did have me on it in 227
Whyyyyyyy
I've come to one potential conclusion here but I'd like to hear it from you
I forgot about you, you are reading too much into it
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 5:03 pm
by JohnnyFarrar
Ah, my self esteem
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 5:04 pm
by JunkoChan
I wouldn't call that "decent content" btw, could you tell me why you consider that not lurking?
dude, you literally said "hi"and yeeted until today in a 14 player game, only now I can remember the entire roster, I literally made a list in my notes to remember the player base and still forgot about you for some reason in that post
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 5:09 pm
by JunkoChan
well now that I think about it from you point of view, anything more than "hi" is decent...
