Mafiascum.net

In post 2497, TheButtonmen wrote:Counterpoint: I understood the reference.

I didn't.

In post 2491, Jake from State Farm wrote:except for that he isn't cocky

But he is, in the best way possible.

Okay. So by MAFIASCUM standards. Maybe his cockiness isn't maximum. It'd probably only be an 8 on a scale of HAHASORTAHUMBLEBUTNOTREALLY to Fate.

But that's because of the culture on MS.net; if he were as cocky as he is on another site, he'd definitely be considered cocky. (Again, in the best way possible. <3 AP.)

In post 2494, Psyche wrote:that's a pretty obscure reference

How the hell is it an obscure reference? I understood it instantly. (Granted, I have an edge over most people, having watched TNG obsessively as a kid, and being exposed to TVTropes, which quite accurately makes the statement that they've got an eerie similarity. )

Heh. I kinda like cocky as a title because it is fairly accurate (although my cockiness is oftentimes just a front) and TIL that male pigeons are called cocks. So the title works in a few ways which is cool.

Im shocked that "Foul Fowl" or something didn't get suggested first tbh and Im surprised OS proposed this. Although I guess I _was_ particularly cocky in mykonian's zombie extravaganza.

I read a lot of games, AP.

Counternom time:

I'm not sure smileys are allowed (or even technically doable) in titles. I can't think of a single example.

may be fine, but it looks terrible.

AngryPidgeon for Tongue in Beak?

In post 2507, xtopherusD wrote:AngryPidgeon for Tongue in Beak?

2nd. That one is quality.

I appreciate the pun, but why does that apply to AP?

In post 2505, Nobody Special wrote:I'm not sure smileys are allowed (or even technically doable) in titles. I can't think of a single example.

Hoopla.

In post 2507, xtopherusD wrote:AngryPidgeon for Tongue in Beak?

the previous suggestion is better, but both seemed forced imo

In post 2507, xtopherusD wrote:AngryPidgeon for

Tongue in Beak

?

I like this one.

In post 2510, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:

In post 2505, Nobody Special wrote:I'm not sure smileys are allowed (or even technically doable) in titles. I can't think of a single example.

Hoopla.

Even as I typed it, I was sure there was a counterexample. I just couldn't bring it to mind. Thanks!

Nominate Cabd for

In post 2514, GuyInFreezer wrote:Nominate Cabd for

Been there read that

Second. It's kinda scary.

He oh so rarely busts it out though.

In post 2509, quadz08 wrote:I appreciate the pun, but why does that apply to AP?

That's a requirement now?

So obviously it's referencing the emoticon and the whole, HAR HAR he's a bird.
And so I know that cocky and tongue-in-cheek can sort of go hand in hand. I was just hoping someone else would fill in that missing link, if it made sense for the guy.

Maybe if you were, like, kwadz08 instead? Seems to fit with the others, I mean.

......

it's . Of course it has to apply to him.

How the hell is it an obscure reference? I understood it instantly.

for some reason i think your being aware of some icon doesn't automatically mean it isn't obscure

In post 2519, quadz08 wrote:......

it's

his title

. Of course it has to apply to him.

Damn sarcasm. On my part. I know it's a requirement now. It was like the first requirement, so I'm good.

In post 2519, quadz08 wrote:......

it's

his title

. Of course it has to apply to him.

My title used to refer to Shea, strange things have happened.

In post 2520, Psyche wrote:

How the hell is it an obscure reference? I understood it instantly.

for some reason i think your being aware of some icon doesn't automatically mean it isn't obscure

I would think that fit is more relevant than obscurity or lack thereof. Given Bert's play style I really can't imagine a better fit.

In post 2517, Natirasha wrote:He oh so rarely busts it out though.

You must not be on the virtual twitterfeed.