Mafiascum.net

I feel like I'm asking reasonable questions. You calling me dense over them only makes me feel like you're dodging reasonable questions.

I realize it may be painful to deal with an intellect so low as mine, but if the questions I ask are so illogical, shouldn't it be easy to show that?

Why would I redirect TO scum.

I want to Redirect SCUM TO someone scum would NEVER KILL.

There's only ONE scum.

So the person I think is sucm is the person I'm REDIRECTING not the person I'm REDIRECTING TO.

How is this hard

In post 2500, northsidegal wrote:I feel like I'm asking reasonable questions. You calling me dense over them only makes me feel like you're dodging reasonable questions.

I realize it may be painful to deal with an intellect so low as mine, but if the questions I ask are so illogical, shouldn't it be easy to show that?

You're literally not reading my posts and posting things I have either already answered or ignoring what I am saying where it is fashionable for you to do so.

And then making posts like this.

In post 2494, Katsuki wrote:

In post 2485, Keychain wrote:

Katsuki wrote:I HOPE Y'ALL DONT GET SUCKERED BY LLD'S SWEET TONGUE

PART OF WHY I WANT HER DEAD TODAY IS BECAUSE I DONT TRUST THE REST OF YALL TO POWERLYNCH HER WITHOUT QUESTION AFTER MY TOWNFLIP

Whoa deja vu 1478

In post 2478, Katsuki wrote:irregardless

You're a fan of this word


Out of the 1v1, I'd much prefer to lynch LLD.

Maybe I do like it a bit much ^_^

OH THAT REMINDS ME

IF BY SOME INSANITY LLD/KATSUKI BOTH FLIP TOWN, MOLLA IS SCUM

If your town dude you played awful and I have no Ragrets

You’re

In post 2501, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Why would I redirect TO scum.

I want to Redirect SCUM TO someone scum would NEVER KILL.

There's only ONE scum.

So the person I think is sucm is the person I'm REDIRECTING not the person I'm REDIRECTING TO.

How is this hard

Can you redirect a player to themselves is NSGs questiob

In post 2505, BBmolla wrote:

In post 2501, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Why would I redirect TO scum.

I want to Redirect SCUM TO someone scum would NEVER KILL.

There's only ONE scum.

So the person I think is sucm is the person I'm REDIRECTING not the person I'm REDIRECTING TO.

How is this hard

Can you redirect a player to themselves is NSGs questiob

No. Against the rules, no redirector can do that what

How hurtful.

There's an obvious explanation for my play which can be given postgame.

Not sure why you expected me to have read the game in full upon replacing in tho, it's not like it's anything new after 8 years.

In post 2501, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Why would I redirect TO scum.

I want to Redirect SCUM TO someone scum would NEVER KILL.

There's only ONE scum.

So the person I think is sucm is the person I'm REDIRECTING not the person I'm REDIRECTING TO.

How is this hard

Obviously I realize that the person you're redirecting is meant to be scum. What I'm saying is that, given the goal of redirecting to someone scum would never kill, your target choice of redirecting ginngie doesn't make much sense to me.

In post 2508, northsidegal wrote:

In post 2501, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Why would I redirect TO scum.

I want to Redirect SCUM TO someone scum would NEVER KILL.

There's only ONE scum.

So the person I think is sucm is the person I'm REDIRECTING not the person I'm REDIRECTING TO.

How is this hard

Obviously I realize that the person you're redirecting is meant to be scum. What I'm saying is that, given the goal of redirecting to someone scum would never kill, your target choice of redirecting

to

ginngie doesn't make much sense to me.

I already explained why I chose Ginngie in a post on the last page.

If you don't understand that post, quoting it and explaining WHY, would help me believe you have any kind of reading comprehension.

In post 2479, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Literally, after I called her scum yesterday, I felt she would be the LAST PERSON scum would kill. My other thought was Aristophanes, but I felt that it was better to go with Ginngie, feels like a more "out there" kill.

Like, ginngie doesn't seem like a more "out there" kill to me than aristo at all.

In post 2507, Katsuki wrote:How hurtful.

There's an obvious explanation for my play which can be given postgame.

Not sure why you expected me to have read the game in full upon replacing in tho, it's not like it's anything new after 8 years.

You can just give it now unless it’s REDACTED for reasons

Don't feel like it.

join us for dota sometime btw

In post 2513, Katsuki wrote:join us for dota sometime btw

yeah, pls play dota with us :3

In post 2510, northsidegal wrote:

In post 2479, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Literally, after I called her scum yesterday, I felt she would be the LAST PERSON scum would kill. My other thought was Aristophanes, but I felt that it was better to go with Ginngie, feels like a more "out there" kill.

Like, ginngie doesn't seem like a more "out there" kill to me than aristo at all.

with me calling her scum, from the perspective of trying to frame me (Which is the only scenario where this matters)?

Shows over I’ll be on a lot more now

Katsuki if Me you and LLD are town who is scum?

In post 2515, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 2510, northsidegal wrote:

In post 2479, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Literally, after I called her scum yesterday, I felt she would be the LAST PERSON scum would kill. My other thought was Aristophanes, but I felt that it was better to go with Ginngie, feels like a more "out there" kill.

Like, ginngie doesn't seem like a more "out there" kill to me than aristo at all.

with me calling her scum, from the perspective of trying to frame me (Which is the only scenario where this matters)?

I don't understand what you're trying to say here.

In post 2517, northsidegal wrote:

In post 2515, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 2510, northsidegal wrote:

In post 2479, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Literally, after I called her scum yesterday, I felt she would be the LAST PERSON scum would kill. My other thought was Aristophanes, but I felt that it was better to go with Ginngie, feels like a more "out there" kill.

Like, ginngie doesn't seem like a more "out there" kill to me than aristo at all.

with me calling her scum, from the perspective of trying to frame me (Which is the only scenario where this matters)?

I don't understand what you're trying to say here.

The obvious kill is me.

The less obvious kill is [anyone else in the game].

Within that subset of [anyone else in the game] the motivation is clearly to try and get me lynched.

So, I presumed I would either

1) get the target right and live
2) die
3) get the target wrong, but live as a result of them choosing to kill someone else to lynch me

so in #1 and 2, I'm the target of the kill originally, but I either die or redirect it. In these cases, the person I redirect to does not matter.

In #3 I'm not the target of the kill, so it opens the possibility where I target someone, and then redirect that person to the person who scum chose to kill, which gives me a false positive.

False positives are deadly, so I tried to pick the player I thought scum would kill the least likely.

That player was Ginngie. Why? because if they go for plan 3, which includes "lynching LLD by framing her", they would need to make a kill that makes sense for LLD to make. Ginngie thought I was town, and I thought she was scum, and she even agreed to die later in the game if needed.

As a result, among all the kills I found her least likely, and so to avoid overlap and the false positive world, I chose her as the redirect target.

This seems like a lock you guys. I believe LLD.

Plus..Mulch was scum..and Kats is lurkerscum.
Plus...LLDscum fakeguilty at 7p doesnt make sense.
If she was pulling this in LYLO then obv, but here? No.

Oh hey Kats- you should fulclaim. Mulch was softing a bunch, so we know you are power.

In post 2519, camn wrote:This seems like a lock you guys. I believe LLD.

I do, too. Absolutely.

I'm ready to vote for Kats as soon as camn or LLD gives me the go-ahead, how's that?