Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 6:52 am
@Wave - I don’t think it’s a bad case; i just think it’s incorrect. It was actually a rather good case, better if he was scum, however I think the mindset and agenda behind it is coming from annoyed town.
Oh, this was referring to Hopkirk, wasn’t it? Hopkirk has a good case.In post 2489, wavemode wrote:bad case. most of it is oversimplification and ignoring nuance. I don't see anything there that's scum indicative, especially if you juxtapose kk's supposedly shallow engagement with that of a number of other players who are much worse. I still townread Kublai
Going over mentions/timings/when interactions began.In post 2496, JarJarDrinks wrote:because FL is interacting with him I suppose.
1742- Worth quoting. Defends Android/Wave saying FL is worse (hasn’t tried to start a FL wagon oddly).In post 1742, Kublai Khan wrote:Like, I don't know why people are whining about Android18 or wavemode or whoever else with Flavor Leaf around.
just feels like he's trying to provoke a reaction rather than directly attack youIn post 2442, Flavor Leaf wrote:You could say the exact same thing here, and literally just change that T to an S and does the same thing, if not more. This is projecty. However this does make me feel GROB and KK arent scum together.
thisIn post 2461, PenguinPower wrote:Creature replacing out nullifies my town read on his slot.
JJD is towny, KK is meh, FL is scummy.In post 2506, Hopkirk wrote:What are your reads looking like Ausuka? I know last list had JJD, KK, and FL all near/at the bottom.
How do you feel about KK/FL interactions.
all of this feels like town hopkirkIn post 2470, Hopkirk wrote:When I put the vote down, I'd looked at how you interacted with Android, Wave, Ausuka, Performer, Flavour (though less here), Ousuka, Almost50, and a couple of lurkers. That's the main part of the case and was enough for me to move you to scum. The rest I looked at to see if I got a similar sense of things.
This, if confirmation biased, is going to be equally confirm.biased whether I do it right after reading the first set of interactions, or a few days later. So timing shouldn't matter here.
Of course whether it was put together before or after I voted doesn't change whether the content is valid or not.
Interested in some kind of reads list, especially your thoughts on Wave, thoughts on lurkers and why flavour differs.
this is pretty damningIn post 2487, JarJarDrinks wrote:Since you decided to self meta mofo:
Here are examples of flavor leaf thinking things are "classic mafia" in other games:In post 2377, Flavor Leaf wrote:Also, JJ is letting KK Kubla Khan some more. They’re taking turns.Classic scum buddy move.
Spoiler:
Have you ever thought someone was classic scum when you were town bro?
my point is that you can only play the game that's in front of you. if a player is generally low-activity, there's less to engage with. your case selectively glosses over the areas where KK does engage more deeply with players who areIn post 2497, Hopkirk wrote:'Other people are engaging less' is pretty much textbook 'whataboutism' to detract from actually looking at an issue ('X is bad', 'Y is worse than X' doesn't mean X isn't concerning). Of course I'm also taking issue with how he's engaging/who he's engaging with- and maybe moreso, who he isn't engaging with. The critique isn't that he's not posting content, it's how he's posting and what he's not posting.
Even ignoring the fact that he later advocated for my lynch/vengekill (In post 2497, Hopkirk wrote:Do you feel like he was buddying you at all when he went hard against Ausuka/Performer while defending you when you were a leading dual wagon?
No, because the players across the game are not consistent in their levels of content with which to engage.In post 2497, Hopkirk wrote:Do you think he's consistent in how he engages across the game?
wavemode was possible PR when ausuka outed as IC & performer was vengeful; the rest of the hood had PR roles so why is it weird to think he might be PR as wellIn post 2473, JarJarDrinks wrote:when did wavemode become possible PR? Wavemode was a wagon on day 1. Seems weird to suggest he'd be a possible scum NK.In post 2365, Golden Robster wrote:scum had multiple potential NK targets such as ausuka (conf town), wavemode (neighbour + possible PR) and vax (claimed vig and implied shooting me or wavemode)
why would they avoid all of this in favor of killing a50?
piggy-backing on someone elses argument & reasoningIn post 2488, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Kublai Khan
I think this is a good case, and think that the points brought up are valid points.
talk to me why you believe this?In post 2474, Lalendra wrote:Mylo slipped down to scumlean on my list with that vote on PP. I don't see any reason for it at all, andit seemed like he was opportunistically picking on someone that he knew was not around when he was pressured to throw down a vote.
Your 2502 is conspicuously ignoring 2211. Do you disagree with his observation? Or do you just disagree with his conclusion that FL is scum (and why, I might ask)?In post 2516, Hopkirk wrote:@Wave, considering 2502 that I posted above, why do you think KK pushed FL while not mentioning Android. Bearing in mind that Android was a leading wagon at the time and FL had no votes on him?
and before you say he just came up with this reasoning today, he made the same observation in 1204In post 2519, wavemode wrote:Your 2502 is conspicuously ignoring 2211. Do you disagree with his observation? Or do you just disagree with his conclusion that FL is scum (and why, I might ask)?In post 2516, Hopkirk wrote:@Wave, considering 2502 that I posted above, why do you think KK pushed FL while not mentioning Android. Bearing in mind that Android was a leading wagon at the time and FL had no votes on him?
I feel it's clear I ignored everything after they started interacting since at that point either one of them could retroactively apply justification- and basically everything is justifiable in retrospect. He doesn't say that when he's pushing for a Flavour wagon D1.In post 2519, wavemode wrote:Your 2502 is conspicuously ignoring 2211. Do you disagree with his observation? Or do you just disagree with his conclusion that FL is scum (and why, I might ask)?In post 2516, Hopkirk wrote:@Wave, considering 2502 that I posted above, why do you think KK pushed FL while not mentioning Android. Bearing in mind that Android was a leading wagon at the time and FL had no votes on him?
Yeah and this is the crux of why I think your "case" is ridiculous. You look at certain posts and perspectives and selectively decide they are scum indicative, but you look at posts like 1204 and decide they're irrelevant. He's making the same arguments as a previous game where he was town? Eh, it's because he's scum and it's "fresh in his mind" lmao. It all feels rather arbitrary.In post 2523, Hopkirk wrote:I feel it's clear I ignored everything after they started interacting since at that point either one of them could retroactively apply justification- and basically everything is justifiable in retrospect. He doesn't say that when he's pushing for a Flavour wagon D1.
He mentioned it in 1204 but it went nowhere. Flavour replied on the same page and KK didn't respond to the reply. Isn't clear here he has a problem with it. He doesn't start treating Flavour differently to other lurkers at this point.
I don't know what KK thinks, you should ask him. Could you point me to where he said he thinks active lurking is fine?In post 2523, Hopkirk wrote:Are you saying KK thinks active lurking is fine, but calling attention to your own active lurking/not doing stuff D1 (he mentions this a couple of times, Flavour does it explicitly too) is scum indicative?
Not really, or I would have brought it up. Though at present I don't know what to think about FL. Unlike KK's "hard defense" of me as you call it, FL's 2378 felt really heavy-handed and unnecessary, and actually does feel like buddying. And this KK push stinks. I literally asked when the day started:In post 2523, Hopkirk wrote:On a similar note, do you have a problem with FL saying he didn't want to do stuff D1?
And nobody has yet given me an answer to that question that doesn't make me roll my eyes, hard.In post 2395, wavemode wrote:Why are people scumreading KK? I think I missed what the reasoning for that was