Page 101 of 164
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 7:58 am
by HeWhoSwims
Xyzzy > profii > A50 in terms of lynches. I suggested mine ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 7:59 am
by Chickadee
I also think popcorn is a bad idea. I think that the two people who get fruit claim it in their first post, and until then tomorrow, no one else even talks about fruit.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:28 am
by xyzzy
so I went kind of back and forth on this a couple times over the past couple days but I think I've settled on there being a greater than average chance that your interactions with dramonic were bussing yesterday. my feelings there have Rapidly Evolved but that's pretty much where I'm at.
the worst probably should've gone in the third group with Raskolnikov and HeWhoSwims, possibly ranking a little higher; I've just not really had many strong impressions of him this game and I've read a couple of critiques of him that I've found generally agreeable.
In post 2501, Chickadee wrote:I also think popcorn is a bad idea. I think that the two people who get fruit claim it in their first post, and until then tomorrow, no one else even talks about fruit.
I feel like that system is a lot more vulnerable to scum trying to exploit it? like if everyone claims fruit/no fruit in an order that scum can't directly control, it becomes much harder for them to try to outguess the fruit vendors.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:33 am
by Ausuka
How can scum exploit the current system?
Loyal fruit vends might be worth less now ftr since we don't know if mafia have a tracking role.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:34 am
by Inferno390
Will lynch xyzzy now. Game narrative is being completely ignored for the sake of thier reads.
@xyzzy: You do realize that TW CLAIMED THE SHOT ON DRAM, RIGHT?
VOTE: xyzzy
This is L-2.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:36 am
by Ausuka
Can you walk me through how xyzzy is completely ignoring the game narrative inferno?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:38 am
by Chickadee
In post 2502, xyzzy wrote:
so I went kind of back and forth on this a couple times over the past couple days but I think I've settled on there being a greater than average chance that your interactions with dramonic were bussing yesterday. my feelings there have Rapidly Evolved but that's pretty much where I'm at.
the worst probably should've gone in the third group with Raskolnikov and HeWhoSwims, possibly ranking a little higher; I've just not really had many strong impressions of him this game and I've read a couple of critiques of him that I've found generally agreeable.
In post 2501, Chickadee wrote:I also think popcorn is a bad idea. I think that the two people who get fruit claim it in their first post, and until then tomorrow, no one else even talks about fruit.
I feel like that system is a lot more vulnerable to scum trying to exploit it? like if everyone claims fruit/no fruit in an order that scum can't directly control, it becomes much harder for them to try to outguess the fruit vendors.
Fruit vendors can confirm their targets.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:51 am
by xyzzy
right, but if scum has good reason to believe they were targeted by a fruit vendor based either on their own role or on the lack of other players claiming having received fruit, that gives them a small chance to claim having received fruit. this is obviously incredibly unlikely to work, but why would we leave that possibility open when there's a system that removes it?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 8:53 am
by Ausuka
But how does this help? You still have people at the end of the chain being able to predict it. If we're really worried about this, nobody should post until whoever received fruit claims.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 9:08 am
by Chickadee
We know the fruit vendors. The fruit vendors know their targets. Counter claims should be easily resolved.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 9:24 am
by Gamma Emerald
we do normal popcorn strats where we make sure the scummiest claim first? Why are people being dense here
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 9:24 am
by brassherald
The scum would still have to guess which of them received fruit, its not like there's just one scum who can say "No one else received fruit, so, it must have been me!"
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 9:26 am
by profii
We seem to be making a meal of the fruit stuff - if we get 2 claims tomorrow and 2 confirmations, what’s the problem?
If scum try to fake it, a tracker _might_ catch one out _or_ someone in the loop will die and the flip will verify one of the vendors - at which point if scum tried to fake it, then we will catch 2 scum at once
The other risk is scum create a load of innos
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 9:27 am
by profii
In post 2511, brassherald wrote:The scum would still have to guess which of them received fruit, its not like there's just one scum who can say "No one else received fruit, so, it must have been me!"
Didn’t even think of that way haha ignore me
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 9:40 am
by Inferno390
In post 2505, Ausuka wrote:Can you walk me through how xyzzy is completely ignoring the game narrative inferno?
He says that TW and I are likely scum.
A) Once again, narrative explaining how my hardtunnel on Dram (especially after he claimed) that makes logical sense would be appreciated.
B) TW claimed the shot on Dram. Which means mechanically, he’s vig, SK, or he shot his partner...?
Or he’s looking for a CC, but given the gamestate, that’d be pretty much scumteam suicide.
So yeah. There’s some serious bull being spouted from xyzzy that I don’t like.
Also not liking their most recent stuff about fruit vendors. It 1) sounds way too convulted to come from a town standpoint, and 2) it feels like scum trying to set something up.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 9:50 am
by Inferno390
Yeah
We should have everyone except the vendors claim on fruit, THEN have the vendors claim.
Our loud person, if you’re a tracker or such or a protective, target one of the FV. If it’s a cop, preferably MoI, but that’s just me. If a tracker-like role, it doesn’t matter which unless you get info on who was targeting your target. I’m that I would suggest targeting Ausuka. That way if scum decides to shoot her for whatever reason, at least we know about it. Course, if your reads on these two slots are opposite mine, go ahead and do your thing. That’s just what I’d do in your shoes.
TW, can you shoot in a pool of A50, Profii, Sky, and any other lurkers at this point?
Gamma can do what he thinks best at this point unless anyone else has a suggestion.
I don’t know what your investigative is Andy, so I’m not gonna make any assumptions on what you should be doing.
Any thoughts on this?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 9:57 am
by Inferno390
On a final note, I don’t know why there are still people calling me probscum. Like, I’m acutely aware of the fact that my playstyle is scummy anyways, but unless someone can actually bring a reasonable, fleshed out narrative on how my associations with dram is scum, please buzz off. And if you do, I’d love to hear it.
Because at this point I don’t even see how that accusation makes sense atp.
Also, I’ve decidedly that I’ve been using a term wrong. I’m not conftown. I’m just NARRARTIVELY IMPOSSIBLE TO BE SCUM.
Which is the same thing, but hey.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 10:24 am
by Chickadee
yall rea;ize only one person is getting fruit right?
They just have to claim it.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 10:31 am
by Inferno390
True.
I still think that we should follow that plan though, because like as Brass said, if Ausuka manages to hit someone on the scumteam (assuming she’s not lying ofc), we have the possibility of catching the scumteam that way.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 10:34 am
by brassherald
In post 2517, Chickadee wrote:yall rea;ize only one person is getting fruit right?
They just have to claim it.
Why'd you say that? I was hoping the scum would forget that only one of us is supposed to get fruit tomorrow or think we forgot and then we get an easy lynch!
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 10:58 am
by the worst
profii is still scum right?
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 11:10 am
by Skygazer
i really wish the profii wagon hadn't disintegrated
i still think xyzzy is not the best option here, although i haven't been liking their latest posts as much to be honest
VOTE: HWS
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 11:10 am
by Inferno390
Possibly.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 11:12 am
by Chickadee
In post 2519, brassherald wrote: In post 2517, Chickadee wrote:yall rea;ize only one person is getting fruit right?
They just have to claim it.
Why'd you say that? I was hoping the scum would forget that only one of us is supposed to get fruit tomorrow or think we forgot and then we get an easy lynch!
Because it seemed everyone had lost their minds.
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2018 11:25 am
by profii
I figured I was either getting lynched or you’re shooting me tonight hence why I’ve just ducked out this game more or less
One of the reasons I said kill me isn’t so bad is because I’m just a VT so if it helps the game move from me being the distraction I still say go for it - I’m still calling it now that you are SK even if you do shoot me out the lynch pool for leash cred
See yall in dead thread