so I thought I'd respond to the substance of this point:NorwegianboyEE wrote:Mena i don't get your thought process here.In post 1791, Menalque wrote:because it was an atrocious claim and he chose not to target the conf!town N2?
Apparently it was a "bad claim" because i claimed when it was looking like i was very close to getting lynched. So what you're saying is that i should claim when i only have 2 or 3 votes on me? Why in the actual fuck would i claim a power role and expose myself to the mafia when there's still the possibility i don't need to? This is such a retarded way of thinking i just don't get how you're still hammering this point like it holds any value.
Also the fact that there WAS another protective role that wouldn't roleblock Chemist on N2, but he stupidly chose to defend me for some dumb reason.
the reason I thought it was a bad claim is that I thought any protectives should have always been on chemist as he was conf!town and had the ability to nail further scum meaning scum were basically never leaving him alive
I didn't want you to claim immediately or anything, but I found it really suspect that you hadn't crumbed until later as I think later game crumbing s more indicative of mafia bc mafia potentially have to claim around how the game state has evolved rather than just true claiming their role regardless
therefore it's harder for mafia to crumb in let's say the first 100-150 posts bc they'd have to predict accurately which claim they'd need for later on. yes, this can somewhat be avoided by crumbing multiple roles, but that's also risky bc if it gets noticed then you're p much outed imo
there's also another reason why I was sticking hard to my guns: I was under a reasonable amount of suspicion at this point, if memory serves me right, so I needed to double down on the argument to show that I mislynched you out of genuine conviction that you were scum instead of scum!me mislynching you to eliminate a widely TR player