Hmm, does scum!skitt ever claim vig here and then try to explain a missing NK every night until she gets lynched? I feel like the answer is probably not and also I kind of doubt scum let vig!skitt live multiple nights due to the strength of her reads and that even as SK she would have to turn on them I think tonight if she wanted to win
In post 2516, lilith2013 wrote:there’s a 50% chance of there being an SK.... vs like a 5% chance of a vig. like in most universes we do have an SK?
I don't get where you got those %ages, but I'd say the Vig has a way higher probability than 5%. Just ONE rolle of a K (10% each roll * 7 rolls = 70%, then divided by 2 because it's a 50-50 Vig/Vengeful = 35%. Assuming one K was rolled (10%) another K is 60% (60% total) but in that case we would be guaranteed BOTH Vig AND Vengful, but I'm not going to take this into account. Just the first part tells me we have
at least
a 35% chance of having a Vig in play).
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:25 am
by Menalque
Inb4 skitter retracts and claims VT at like 5 days to deadline (love u turkey)
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:25 am
by Datisi
menaaaaaaaa don't make me start scumreading youuuu
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:25 am
by lilith2013
okay according to my math there’s approximately a 3.3% chance of there being a vig in this setup so clearly i went wrong somewhere
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:26 am
by lilith2013
welp clearly i’ve been thinking about this setup completely wrong
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:26 am
by Menalque
Okay, so taking it as given that skitter is a vig, that means that we’re in a setup with at least 2 tpr right? So we’re looking for setups which are TTTTT or lower for scum power
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:26 am
by skitter30
yeah as soon as i rolled vig i was p sure i'd be getting things like that no matter what i did so i just kinda wanted to substantiate the role existing and try to minimize collateral damage
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:26 am
by Menalque
In post 2528, Datisi wrote:menaaaaaaaa don't make me start scumreading youuuu
Huh
What?
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:27 am
by Something_Smart
In post 2522, Menalque wrote:That’s a bold claim for skitt to be making here if she’s SK, not that it makes it impossible
"Bold" is not the word I would use. I prefer "stupid".
Because at 3 TPR it switches to a JOAT and doesn’t change back until you get to like 5 TPRs in the game
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:34 am
by skitter30
i mean we don't know if those other prs dont' exist yet, we wouldn't exactly see the outcome of those actions
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:35 am
by Menalque
Like 4 Ts or 3Ts are the most likely outcomes, yes? I’m pretty sure bingle/ddl ran the math on that in C9++
So if we’ve ruled out that we’re in 7 or 6 Ts and we know that 0 or 1 Ts are unlikely, it means that unless we’re in 2 or 5 there’s no bus driver
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:36 am
by Menalque
In post 2544, skitter30 wrote:i mean we don't know if those other prs dont' exist yet, we wouldn't exactly see the outcome of those actions
Unless we’re in a 5T scenario I think it’s unlikely we have a bus driver
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:36 am
by skitter30
ok but we dont' know that yet so i don't want to rule out those things yet
i know i'm a pr
there's likely a doc/commuter/etc
so two PR's, and TTTTT or fewer, and that's all i'm comfortable assuming just yet
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:37 am
by skitter30
and i need people to help me optimize who to vig except i'll probably only listen to the people i townread
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:37 am
by Menalque
In post 2542, Datisi wrote:idk they sound like those convoluted "hmm i wonder if this is happening" posts that scum!mena makes
Well err, they’re not? They’re me trying to work through the new information that we supposedly have a town vig and whether I think skitt would claim that as SK or as groupscum at this point in the game