I am hereby claiming a
So yeah, elimming me today would be....very dumb.
I'll accept your apology.In post 2527, NorwegianboyEE wrote:That still doesn't change the fact that your case on Duppin was bad.
consider me committed lad!In post 2531, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You might just be faking it to gain momentum for your push here, but eh.
You'll have to commit yourself either way.
okay i thought this was a pretty funny read actually and i dont mean that in a condescending way, i just remember someone else pointing out my usage of to be honest a while ago.In post 2481, Battle Mage wrote:i tried to case duppin, but too many scummy posts to count. like, read his bloody ISO for goodness sake. If you can't seeduppin is obvscum, no amount of coaching from me is gonna help you like every post oozes it.
i'll be honest scumtells and a couple other randoms
In post 613, duppin wrote:i believe he said he was from another site but yes i think it is fairly obvious it is an alt and most likely someone from MS, but i dont think that is a reason for me to be more open to the idea of selfvotingto be honestIn post 597, duppin wrote:In post 364, Redados wrote:I'm semi-upset that we're on page 15 and it feels like we just left RVS. Not cool.i have to admitthat i really dislike this post. also credited Shelly for finally moving the game out of rvs in 154, i can appreciate the fact that perhaps the game didn't move in the direction you wanted but yeah.
overall you come across as really careful to me which i find suspiciousIn post 1020, duppin wrote:hmI am going to be honestNoraa, if you are town you are mislynch bait.
60% of your posts are fluff and the rest of your play is just reactionary which I'd normally consider to be a scumtell. You're not really doing anything proactive whatsoever, the readlist you just gave before gives the impression you're not really trying to figure out peoples alignment (like mixing me and bugspray up at this point is really weird to me). It doesnt really feel like youre putting in an effort to solve peoples alignment, however I am not convinced you are scum at all as this could indeed just come from a new player as well but yea if you are town then I sincerely hope you can be a bit more proactiveIn post 1482, duppin wrote:your progression on me is really difficult to followIn post 1473, shellyc wrote: will tentatively jump on duppin wagon since after revisiting their ISO didn’t look very good. they’re a big null and I want to pressure themto be honest, but i will bite. Why do you think my ISO looks bad?In post 1507, duppin wrote:no matter what your alignment is I really think you need to drop the role fishing angle because no one talked about roles until you brought it up the second time i asked you if you were going to follow up on your statement since you said you would do so. you were the first and only one to indirectly paint yourself as a role, i have not asked for your role at any point all I did was ask you if you were going to follow up on your claim saying that your confidence had nothing to do with your alignment which to me indicated that it had nothing to do with your role either, so i have no idea how you could reach the conclusion it could be rolefishing the second timeIn post 1504, shellyc wrote:jester + duppin role fishing scum?
I explicitly softed hard that I was an Informed Townie to find those ROLEFISHERS
in all honestness it’s just a play style choice. jesters right, im trying to be more assertive to push my reads harder and be more convincing as town?to be honest.In post 1509, duppin wrote:oh you said it was a playstyle choice. if that is the case then I think this was a weird playto be honestIn post 2081, duppin wrote:honestly i wouldstill like to hear from mundivore and plus before hammering
yuck, keeping your options open to elim a town PR? gross[/quote]In post 2138, duppin wrote:tayl0r i just read your claim and while i am not entirely sure i believe it, it is definitely enough for me to not want to lim you. would you still like me to respond to your posts?
i mean sure you could maybe argue for this if you ignore the context. it was a response to tayl0r saying people to let her speak before hammering in 2110.LAMISTIn post 2120, duppin wrote:i have no intention of quickhammering, ill respond to all of your posts as soon as possible probably in 30 min or so
i have absolutely no idea what you think this is thoughIn post 1710, duppin wrote:by the wayi genuinely thinkthe spam in this game has been a bit too much but perhaps thats just me, but keep in mind this is with 1 player being vl/a, 1 replacement and 1 slot still waiting to be replacedIn post 618, duppin wrote:I decided to go ISO Jester one more time.
I doactuallybelieve he is town. I absolutely hate his self voting and I hope he stops doing it, but I am not interested in creating unnecessary distractions by pushing a policy lynch apparently no one else agrees with when I believe the player is most likely town.
UNVOTE:
wait what if you are town then this is a ridiculous thing to say, since from your point of view you should know that you are town so even if you mislim to me you should not just accept being limmed the next day for being wrong when your case is so weak, makes no sense to do such a play on day 1.In post 2509, Battle Mage wrote:could i make you a deal that if duppin flips town today, i promise you can flip me tomorrow?
well he claims to be a pr that can confirm himself which i am unsure what to think of. its a very vague claim and i am unsure as to what he means with confirming himselfIn post 2540, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Duppin, is BM scum or town.
But see the issue with you not providing any reasoning besides a meta read that has already been proven to be wrong, people have already pushed on me several times today making up their opinion on my slot, so if you are town why would they from your point of view change their opinion just because of a wrong meta read? (also if you are town and you end up mislimming me today you probably need to look at people being swayed by this since it is proven to be wrong)In post 2545, Battle Mage wrote:hi Duppin, I don't have much time atm, but just to conclude with a couple things:
1. From my early impressions, I respect you as a player regardless of what you flip, and don't think you've played badly here.
2. I think the points you have made above are broadly fair, and I'm not going to pick them apart with a fine toothcomb.
3. My reasons for suspecting you are much more than I've posted in thread, but I don't want to over-effort this. People will come to their own views.
and that is another issue - if you are so confident I am scum why are would you not try to present a proper case on me to lim me? i dont think your attitude really lines up with your apparent read on me4. I'm going to try and elim you today, as my gut is you are scum. It's not a personal thing.
mon amiIn post 2547, duppin wrote:But see the issue with you not providing any reasoning besides a meta read that has already been proven to be wrong, people have already pushed on me several times today making up their opinion on my slot, so if you are town why would they from your point of view change their opinion just because of a wrong meta read? (also if you are town and you end up mislimming me today you probably need to look at people being swayed by this since it is proven to be wrong)In post 2545, Battle Mage wrote:hi Duppin, I don't have much time atm, but just to conclude with a couple things:
1. From my early impressions, I respect you as a player regardless of what you flip, and don't think you've played badly here.
2. I think the points you have made above are broadly fair, and I'm not going to pick them apart with a fine toothcomb.
3. My reasons for suspecting you are much more than I've posted in thread, but I don't want to over-effort this. People will come to their own views.
and that is another issue - if you are so confident I am scum why are would you not try to present a proper case on me to lim me? i dont think your attitude really lines up with your apparent read on me4. I'm going to try and elim you today, as my gut is you are scum. It's not a personal thing.
no not really, not because i dont want to but more so because my reads would really depend on how this goes down. As stated above if I get mislynched due to a player refusing to present an actual case and instead going with a meta read that another player has already proven is wrong, then it does not seem reasonable to me that town would be swayed by it (well if they do then that's really poor of them), id reckon it is more likely scum would.In post 2546, Battle Mage wrote:did you want to do a final readslist beforehand? - if you flip town and I'm around tomorrow, I commit to giving it due consideration.