Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2020 11:27 am
benhalkum has been prodded
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
That's just me taking the piss out of this lim and nothing else, everything following that I maintain wrt my current position in the threadIn post 2517, notscience wrote:And this whole “you’re better than that”
“I’m just a martyr”
“We’re back at square one” is AtE and I refuse to believe a logical player like yourself would resort to AtE as town.
why's pooky red? most i've seen you say is he was being "weird" which doesn't really equate to a fullblown scumcase against him. you believe Vax is scum because he's UTR and not really strongly pushing his reads?In post 2467, unwnd wrote:Here's where I stand from doing a bit of digging.
MOD/Notsci
DGB
Peta
Bork
--
Ffery
Cabd
Skitter
Elements
Prism
Ben
--
Pooky
Vax
The area in the middle is what I'm most interested in solving. Three of those players are here to solve and then the rest are not. The three that are here to solve are each placed just based on their tone mostly. I would say Ffery is probably null-lean town out of the bunch with Cabd still sitting null and Prism being placed there because I am choosing to reset myself. When it comes to Ben/Elements/Skitter, just from ISO'ing the slots I felt Ben had the least amount to say. Not in the same fashion of Vax, but where his last post was that he was gonna make a post that never happened. This reads to me like a potential scum who is making broken promises, and I thought earlier on when I was peeking into the thread where he was getting a good amount of pressure was a good look. The only problem though is my read is based on about...18 posts? I don't remember the exact number. My read becomes situational but I think that dragging someone like him out of the spotlight works in the same way the others do. I felt Skitter was being sensible and I appreciate the clarity, but found myself that her responses were ultimately leaning null. Elements is put there for being on the player-list and I have no further thoughts on them. I think where I stand right now is that I'm probably wrong somewhere in my top-half but confidence assures me no less than one, with the rest of the game being sorted in my nulls and below.
Do you consider all except votes on either unwnd or prism vanity votes? Because I don't want to vote either of them.In post 2521, notscience wrote:All of these vanity votes need to pick a side.
I am not capable of doing thisIn post 2531, notscience wrote:Then you need to be trying to convince people not to vote them.
i guess i understand on vax and do think he should be in the poe still but is not high priority for meIn post 2529, unwnd wrote:My read on Vax is not necessarily UTR. I think that Vax is not going to be pressured to do anything in this environment. He remains UTR because we've let him be, and as I explained before I find his words to be very self-aware but also condescending in a way. Like how he came in and told us to stop arguing and go somewhere or that he didn't get a chance to player or whatever. He's just going to keep doing that and I wanted to bring attention to it. Pooky is not necessarily associative of Vax but there were just some gut tells I got from his early content that never got solved, and put him down there because since that content he's only tapered off and not really done anything to get better. When it comes to Ffery being shaded towards green I explained it a bit earlier
I've been attempting to shift my playstyle away from mega-easy day 1 miselim which has generally involved me being less in everyone's face and thus less of an entity.In post 2535, notscience wrote:I don’t remember you being this much of a nonentity, elements. It’s concerning.
The amount of effort Prism put into their clash with Bork. They even said Bork was trying to back out of it and kept pushing. That amount of effort for something that clearly wasn't enjoyable doesn't come from scum.In post 2534, fferyllt wrote:Talk about why you don't want to vote them?
I made a case but everyone said he was townIn post 2528, petapan wrote:the point about ben promising content and not delivering is a good one, that is one of my own big tells as scum, it's harder to kick into gear to fabricate something.
Extremely so.In post 2539, notscience wrote:Rising.
In post 2536, Cabd wrote:Rising.
what does this mean?In post 2539, notscience wrote:Rising.
Scum meta in 2020. Planning or lack thereof.In post 2543, Elements wrote:In post 2536, Cabd wrote:Rising.what does this mean?In post 2539, notscience wrote:Rising.