Page 102 of 139

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 1:54 pm
by Cape90
In post 1587, Titus wrote:
In post 1583, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1581, Frogsterking wrote:VOTE: pooky
Oh hell no

I don’t want Pooky anymore
Case in point.

Your Pooky read is dependent on your Frogsterking read. Data isn't changing and you aren't investigating.

You're fitting actions to your theory, which makes everyone eyeroll.
This was definitely correct

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 1:58 pm
by Cape90
I think Titus does look better actually
Also yes I do acknowledge Titus went back on the Pooky wagon after a while after that, and I do Indeed sign the paper of acknowledgement there

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 2:20 pm
by Enchant
I will update my list tomorrow, tired now

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 2:45 pm
by Not_Mafia
Nice

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 2:50 pm
by MathBlade
In post 2526, Not_Mafia wrote:Nice
Enjoy conf townieness NM.

Hopefully even though my reads were terrible we can use you + me + Titus (maybe?) and start a townblock

Scum are already at two forced night kills me and you

If we get them up to impossible levels invests will win.

Part of me says we should use our abilities on Titus/vocal people to give scum no quarter and if scum want to shoot Titus it goes to BGC.

I also expect a lot of invest dumping since I wasn’t blocked I doubt a blocker unless they knew the result which tells a lot.

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 3:15 pm
by marcistar
my results useless

but yes u did visit pooky

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 3:34 pm
by MathBlade
I guess we should probably use “heal” tags for a secondary vote.

This would be who BGC/NM/me visit tonight as another cop check.

I kinda wanna try for town today to confirm NM doesn’t visit and BCG does.

Anyone wanna go Titus?

She could go mechanically either way. If two town rolecops exist then that’s kinda weird but best to resolve Titus now.

Then she and NM can run the table.

And we also need a confirm visit from BGC to confirm likely loyal.

Like I think Titus BGC (if she has a shot)
Marci BGC (if she has a shot)
NM Titus
Me Titus
BGC Titus

Might just get us a third/fourth townfirm.

NM from the vig
Titus from lack of second death
BGC from visit on my result + Titus rolecop

If BGC is loyal and I see BGC visit Titus and neither are dead
Then BGC + Titus + NM all town

I kinda doubt the loyal claim and I would like to do this if Titus is down as this game would be horribly broken by mass claim.

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 3:37 pm
by Not_Mafia
I'm just gonna sheep you

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 3:42 pm
by MathBlade
In post 2530, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm just gonna sheep you
Mechanically sure

I am still resetting reads

I think the mech plan is sound but as for who is scum

Error 404: MathBlade rebooting

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 3:58 pm
by Big Chungus Gaming
VOTE: titus

i "visited"

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:00 pm
by MathBlade
In post 2532, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:VOTE: titus

i "visited"
Why are you voting Titus?

Weren’t you supposed to visit Pooky?

Of whom you didn’t visit?

I am so confused.

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:01 pm
by Big Chungus Gaming
I did visit pooky.

i think you fail to connect the dots of frogster's flip

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:01 pm
by Big Chungus Gaming
i said "visited" because it failed bc i obviously visited an illegal target

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:01 pm
by MathBlade
This you not visiting makes sense because if you are loyal and submitted an action to Pooky and you’re town you never “visit” so I don’t see it.

How does any of that result in a vote on Titus who I am suggesting the same tonight on?

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:02 pm
by MathBlade
In post 2534, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:I did visit pooky.

i think you fail to connect the dots of frogster's flip
Connect them for me?

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:03 pm
by Big Chungus Gaming
pooky claimed that frogster was clear somehow off an investigative action that pooky supposedly confirmed.

titus was claiming an action that implied frogster was 100% clear

there are too many investigatives here + i think the whole claim was suspicious around it

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:04 pm
by Big Chungus Gaming
well u better hope im not 1 shot, even night, or roleblocked tonight if u wanna do ur plan

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:06 pm
by Titus
In post 2538, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:pooky claimed that frogster was clear somehow off an investigative action that pooky supposedly confirmed.

titus was claiming an action that implied frogster was 100% clear

there are too many investigatives here + i think the whole claim was suspicious around it
This is incorrect. I visited MalcolmTucker n1. He's vanilla. I did get a result n2.

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:06 pm
by MathBlade
In post 2538, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:pooky claimed that frogster was clear somehow off an investigative action that pooky supposedly confirmed.

titus was claiming an action that implied frogster was 100% clear

there are too many investigatives here + i think the whole claim was suspicious around it
I think that mechanically Titus is suspicious because dual role cop.

But by play she really isn’t.

So by you me and NM doing the mass visit again if Titus is scum we aren’t spending pages and pages with Titus to sort her. We just use mech to do it.

If she’s town she won’t die and you won’t die

It’s the same thing as the Pooky plan.

Then we will know her rolecops are legit or not

I agree this level of invests is sus.

But scum killed Frogger over breaking up this conf town chain for a reason.

It’s either to sus Titus or protect her I think.

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:07 pm
by MathBlade
In post 2539, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:well u better hope im not 1 shot, even night, or roleblocked tonight if u wanna do ur plan
If you were those things you’d say so as to not waste the coordination.

So are you?

Should we just be aiming for scum?

I figured you’d love a townfirm.

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:07 pm
by Big Chungus Gaming
In post 2540, Titus wrote:
In post 2538, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:pooky claimed that frogster was clear somehow off an investigative action that pooky supposedly confirmed.

titus was claiming an action that implied frogster was 100% clear

there are too many investigatives here + i think the whole claim was suspicious around it
This is incorrect. I visited MalcolmTucker n1. He's vanilla. I did get a result n2.
you assumed i was clear because of frogster. this is incongruent.

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:08 pm
by Big Chungus Gaming
In post 2542, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2539, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:well u better hope im not 1 shot, even night, or roleblocked tonight if u wanna do ur plan
If you were those things you’d say so as to not waste the coordination.

So are you?

Should we just be aiming for scum?

I figured you’d love a townfirm.
idk if i want to to force scum to play around it

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:09 pm
by MathBlade
In post 2544, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:
In post 2542, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2539, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:well u better hope im not 1 shot, even night, or roleblocked tonight if u wanna do ur plan
If you were those things you’d say so as to not waste the coordination.

So are you?

Should we just be aiming for scum?

I figured you’d love a townfirm.
idk if i want to to force scum to play around it
?? Elaborate please

You don’t want to force scum to have to have less options?

I don’t follow

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:09 pm
by Big Chungus Gaming
mech wifom (:

Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2022 4:10 pm
by MathBlade
In post 2540, Titus wrote:
In post 2538, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:pooky claimed that frogster was clear somehow off an investigative action that pooky supposedly confirmed.

titus was claiming an action that implied frogster was 100% clear

there are too many investigatives here + i think the whole claim was suspicious around it
This is incorrect. I visited MalcolmTucker n1. He's vanilla. I did get a result n2.
Awesome. :) Are you gonna share or holding until midday?