Page 103 of 139
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:27 am
by ReaperCharlie
Darox wrote:ooba wrote:Robo:
I personally feel you're a recruit since the hop on-to my wagon was too easy. Wouldn't you rather try for the opposite recruiter?
I despise this sentence with every fibre of my being. I'd be willing to vote you based on this alone if the singer business made any sense.
Yes. Somebody else saw it too.
LMAO PLANE
Die plz ooba. thx.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:29 am
by ooba
ReaperCharlie wrote:ooba's 2541 is ridiculously terrible.
1. Tries to throw more dirt on my case by saying I shouldn't be paid any attention to because I am biased because of SW mafia.
But did I mention SW mafia in #2500? no. This is a poor excuse to stop his wagon from going through.
2. Asks Robocopter whether he'd rather vote for the "opposite" recruiter. As in, the recruiter that is not him. Scumslip.
Love,
-Reaper
1. The fact that you mentioned it only highlighted my attention to it .. You refer to "Have you seen ooba scum?" many times over .. If that isn't paranoia then I don't know what is .. You ignore all posts - you see what you want to see in a post .. Heights of selection bias if town ..
2. Read properly.
"Robo: I personally
feel you're a recruit
since the hop on-to my wagon was too easy. Wouldn't you rather try for the
opposite recruiter
?" - If he's a recruit, he should be gunning for the opposite recruiter ..
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:38 am
by Darox
ooba wrote:Read properly.
"Robo: I personally
feel you're a recruit
since the hop on-to my wagon was too easy. Wouldn't you rather try for the
opposite recruiter
?" - If he's a recruit, he should be gunning for the opposite recruiter ..
Saw that, still sounds scummy as hell.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:43 am
by Darox
I just noticed that the 3 claimed LC/4 LC actions discrepancy would explain the singer/ooba confusion, so unless Yosarian comes and tells me cults have the ability to night kill, I'm suddenly more amendable to lynching Ooba.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:51 am
by ooba
Darox wrote:ooba wrote:Read properly.
"Robo: I personally
feel you're a recruit
since the hop on-to my wagon was too easy. Wouldn't you rather try for the
opposite recruiter
?" - If he's a recruit, he should be gunning for the opposite recruiter ..
Saw that, still sounds scummy as hell.
Not really .. I was trying to figure out why each person was voting me and convincing each of them .. Robo's jump looked like "Hey. Here's an easy mislynch" scum jump .. Vezo's actions gave me a clear non CR read -> There recruit .. Thought the only way to appeal to a recruit is to tell him I'm not the opposite CR he's looking for and ask him to jump on ..
Darox: If the 4th LC is a part of the bigger cult group (Possible since Me=Weird is the only unclaimed LC action), why in gods name would he claim when there's an easy mislynch on me ..
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:52 am
by ooba
ebwop: jump off ..
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:56 am
by ReaperCharlie
Darox wrote:I just noticed that the 3 claimed LC/4 LC actions discrepancy would explain the singer/ooba confusion, so unless Yosarian comes and tells me cults have the ability to night kill, I'm suddenly more amendable to lynching Ooba.
That's what I've been waiting for too. *waits for Yos*
And btw Darox, you saying this makes me believe you are town. Finally.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:59 am
by ooba
ReaperCharlie wrote:Darox wrote:I just noticed that the 3 claimed LC/4 LC actions discrepancy would explain the singer/ooba confusion, so unless Yosarian comes and tells me cults have the ability to night kill, I'm suddenly more amendable to lynching Ooba.
That's what I've been waiting for too. *waits for Yos*
And btw Darox, you saying this makes me believe you are town. Finally.
Selection bias in action .. Ignoring the spec darox points to for ooba=recruiter confirmation while ignoring the counter ..
Darox: If the 4th LC is a part of the bigger cult group (Possible since Me=Weird is the only unclaimed LC action), why in gods name would he claim when there's an easy mislynch on me ..
And you really weren't waiting for Yos to confirm anything .. Stop lying ..
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:02 am
by ReaperCharlie
Yes, I am very selective.
Yes, I am very biased.
Yes, I am very opinionated.
Any questions?
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 9:54 am
by Robocopter87
ooba wrote:
Robo:
I personally feel you're a recruit since the hop on-to my wagon was too easy. Wouldn't you rather try for the opposite recruiter?
*Chokes Laughing*
God you gotta be kidding me.
Ok ok, I'm sorry I doubted you RC.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:09 am
by Darox
ooba wrote:Darox wrote:ooba wrote:Read properly.
"Robo: I personally
feel you're a recruit
since the hop on-to my wagon was too easy. Wouldn't you rather try for the
opposite recruiter
?" - If he's a recruit, he should be gunning for the opposite recruiter ..
Saw that, still sounds scummy as hell.
Not really .. I was trying to figure out why each person was voting me and convincing each of them .. Robo's jump looked like "Hey. Here's an easy mislynch" scum jump .. Vezo's actions gave me a clear non CR read -> There recruit .. Thought the only way to appeal to a recruit is to tell him I'm not the opposite CR he's looking for and ask him to jump on ..
Ok now it looks less scummy as hell, just poorly worded.
Also, I just noticed that the 3 claimed LC/4 actions thing still doesn't incriminate Ooba outright because it doesn't explain where the fourth action comes from. Unless of course, Yos comes in and tells us if cults can or can not decide to perform night kills.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 11:29 am
by Yosarian2
Darox wrote:I just noticed that the 3 claimed LC/4 LC actions discrepancy would explain the singer/ooba confusion, so unless Yosarian comes and tells me cults have the ability to night kill, I'm suddenly more amendable to lynching Ooba.
I'm not sure what you're saying here.
I'm also not sure how ooba could possibly be a recruiter here. I just don't get it, at all. I get the cop thing, but I don't at all understand how he knew the vigs were called "loose cannons" on day 1. The theory that he knew that because he recruited singer night zero and then used that to breadcrumb day 1 seems really iffy, especially considering how long singer was voting for ooba during a part of day 2 while ooba was in real danger; a recruit bussing her recruiter on day 2 doesn't make any sense at all.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 11:38 am
by ReaperCharlie
What do you make of the two investigations on ooba that both gave non-results?
Do cult factions have a means to nightkill...
other
than recruited Loose Cannons?
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 11:38 am
by ReaperCharlie
^ @ Yos2.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 12:02 pm
by Darox
Yosarian2 wrote:Darox wrote:I just noticed that the 3 claimed LC/4 LC actions discrepancy would explain the singer/ooba confusion, so unless Yosarian comes and tells me cults have the ability to night kill, I'm suddenly more amendable to lynching Ooba.
I'm not sure what you're saying here.
I'm also not sure how ooba could possibly be a recruiter here. I just don't get it, at all. I get the cop thing, but I don't at all understand how he knew the vigs were called "loose cannons" on day 1. The theory that he knew that because he recruited singer night zero and then used that to breadcrumb day 1 seems really iffy, especially considering how long singer was voting for ooba during a part of day 2 while ooba was in real danger; a recruit bussing her recruiter on day 2 doesn't make any sense at all.
This is why I was against lynching Ooba. If there was a fourth LC (And the kills suggest that), then Ooba as recruiter could have instead recruited them and thus learned what he needed to know to fakeclaim. (Couldn't have recruited Zwet because duh)
That sequence of events doesn't explain there being 4 LC actions taken though, so the only possible way Ooba is scum is if cults have a way to commit night kills without using a LC.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 12:03 pm
by Darox
On review that's kinda ambigious. Yosarians points are why I was (and still kinda am) against lynching Ooba. The rest is separate from that statement.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 5:27 pm
by gandalf5166
I think......... ooba is Yos's cult leader. That's why he's not answering our question, is because he knows it's incriminating.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 5:42 pm
by singersigner
We should really just lynch ooba already. I think that'll answer a lot of questions, and if we're wrong, certainly more questions will be answered through ooba's lynch than anyone else's at this point.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 6:06 pm
by Darox
I think the people currently pushing the Ooba lynch are dumb, lazy, or recruited.
Pick any combination of the three.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 6:31 pm
by singersigner
Darox wrote:I think the people currently pushing the Ooba lynch are dumb, lazy, or recruited.
Pick any combination of the three.
While I appreciate everything you came into the game with, and how you so quickly caught up/formed opinions, I don't actually see you placing a vote on someone yet.
Now, does that make you dumb, lazy, or recruited?
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 6:32 pm
by Darox
It makes me undecided.
But if it'll help you sleep at night, I'll vote RC because I still think he is a legitimate lynch choice today.
Aim: ReaperCharlie
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:30 pm
by Yosarian2
ReaperCharlie wrote:What do you make of the two investigations on ooba that both gave non-results?
I already said that I have no explanation for this. I don't get what's going on there. I just don't see how ooba could be a recruiter and claim the way he did.
Do cult factions have a means to nightkill...
other
than recruited Loose Cannons?
this is like the 23rd time I've been asked this question, and I still don't see any reason to answer it.
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:07 pm
by Porochaz
Darox wrote:It makes me undecided.
But if it'll help you sleep at night, I'll vote RC because I still think he is a legitimate lynch choice today.
Aim: ReaperCharlie
With Andrus's innocent on him? Unfortunately not.
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:39 am
by Darox
Have you even read my posts against him?
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:40 am
by Porochaz
Andrius has an innocent on him. That is enough for me.