Mafiascum.net

That can't be, she's obviously villager****

Claims for no reasons results in clusterfucks. No way.

Both of the last 2 pages are almost completely useless.

Rach, yes that's the game. Elyse claimed JK. Six wanted Elyse lynched, so he fakeclaimed doc. Six got lynched because his claim looked fake. He was VT. Everyone got pissed and Six continued to defend his play in the dead QT.

Okay, make that 4 pages... seriously what are you guys doing.

Im not interested in either of those wagons.

In post 2552, Egg wrote:Rach, yes that's the game. Elyse claimed JK. Six wanted Elyse lynched, so he fakeclaimed doc. Six got lynched because his claim looked fake. He was VT. Everyone got pissed and Six continued to defend his play in the dead QT.

And what's the big deal about that? At least I had a laugh
+ Town won anyway, just a game ^^

We have less than two days to deadline Way

If you really are town you need to help us lynch one of the other two larger wagons.

In post 2554, SiX wrote:

In post 2552, Egg wrote:Rach, yes that's the game. Elyse claimed JK. Six wanted Elyse lynched, so he fakeclaimed doc. Six got lynched because his claim looked fake. He was VT. Everyone got pissed and Six continued to defend his play in the dead QT.

And what's the big deal about that? At least I had a laugh
+ Town won anyway, just a game ^^

Yeah I'm avoiding playing future games with you.

In post 2540, DeasVail wrote:

In post 2518, TheWayItEnds wrote:Seriously, if you guys didn't understand how sarcasm works you should have said something a week and a half ago.

Post 1977 has 2 sections. Theres the sarcastic mocking section, and the actual content section. If you replaced everything in that post other than the first and last lines with "this reasoning is bad and you should feel bad for using it" that post would literally have the same meaning.

If you guys are going to read sarcastic posts literally then you might as well lynch me because we are not going to get along.

I like that your attack on post 2117 is about faking sarcasm.

*WARNING THIS IS SARCASM AND NOT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY*
It's a good thing you've just demonstrated how great your grasp is on the use of sarcasm that you've graduated directly into determining alignment based upon it. I'm sure that will be wonderfully accurate.

My post was pretty obviously not taking your sarcasm literally so the fact that you're trying to make it sound like I was is pretty odd!

Yeah. You did. Every part of you talking about 1977 was you taking sarcastic comments at face value.

In post 2553, TheWayItEnds wrote:Okay, make that 4 pages... seriously what are you guys doing.

Im not interested in either of those wagons.

You should be voting no lynch then because that's what you are effectively doing.

In post 2555, RachMarie wrote:We have less than two days to deadline Way

If you really are town you need to help us lynch one of the other two larger wagons.

ThAds town im not voting him.

Voting for matt is the same thing as voting for a lurker.

You guys are welcome to join me for AP or PV though.

Theway, why is lurking a town tell?

About projectmatt. I've ISO'ed him and I still can't get a good read on him. I could easily go him either way. I also ISO'ed two past games of him, one town and one scum and the only conclusion I could reach was that he is disengaged. IMO, lyching him is a shot in the dark. What's the case on him even?

2275 shows that he knows he's coasting, and knows that it's making him suspected. But he doesn't really change this. This shows that the coasting is irrelevant to alignment at the very least. You could also possibly argue that scum would be more motivated to make the time to look town, but this is possibly player-dependent.

2217 comes across as genuine. I feel that scum would actually make more effort to have proper scumreads, whereas I can definitely relate to the difficulty in forming scumreads as town.

I feel like scum could easily have a more reasonably short PoE list in 2002 than PMatt has done. This comes across as someone who is genuinely struggling to keep up with the game and form reads etc.

The above are the recent posts of PMatt's that I find town. The read is still relatively weak, but I wouldn't be happy lynching him.

In post 2557, TheWayItEnds wrote:Yeah. You did. Every part of you talking about 1977 was you taking sarcastic comments at face value.

That's different from thinking you're scum faking the sarcasm, which is what I was arguing, and what you recognised to be my argument, so

ummm Six. Rach and I have no qt. Rach is mod confirmed town 'cause the mod sent me a message the last night that told me so. TBH, I don't see any difference between you calling yourself conf town and Rach calling herself town. The only difference is that I KNOW rach is town. If you want to argue that I'm not town then fine but then I'm confused WHY you find me scum 'cause the only reason you mentioned it that my whiteknighting of Rach was scummy but now you know why I was so....What am I scummy for now?

Deas, you are assuming that projectmatt plays scum a certain way. Snow's meta of him suggests he doesn't play scum the way you assume he would.

DV
That was your argument for 2177. That didnt appear to be your argument for 1977.


Egg:
Lurking isnt a towntell. People with content are easier to find scum in rather than rolling the dice on a lurker.

I actually think PM is more likely to flip scum than town, but I'm REALLY sure that AP and PV will.

Is there anything in projectmatt's posts that you find town? If not, you are inadvertently using lurking as a town tell.

In post 2564, Egg wrote:Deas, you are assuming that projectmatt plays scum a certain way. Snow's meta of him suggests he doesn't play scum the way you assume he would.

Is PMatt's scum meta 'pretend to be struggling with reads'. If so I'll reconsider my read. If not, I won't.

PEdit: I'm not. I don't know what else to say...

I agree with TWIE. I could be completely wrong about Pmatt but he's a lurker and a dice roll.

In post 2567, DeasVail wrote:

In post 2564, Egg wrote:Deas, you are assuming that projectmatt plays scum a certain way. Snow's meta of him suggests he doesn't play scum the way you assume he would.

Is PMatt's scum meta 'pretend to be struggling with reads'. If so I'll reconsider my read. If not, I won't.

PEdit: I'm not. I don't know what else to say...

Is his town meta to be more proactive?

I think he probably lurks regardless of alignment. I think he's scum because he's scared to call anyone scum.

In post 2564, Egg wrote:Deas, you are assuming that projectmatt plays scum a certain way.

Snow's meta of him suggests he doesn't play scum the way you assume he would.

Huh? What did my meta on him suggest?

In post 2565, TheWayItEnds wrote:DV
That was your argument for 2177. That didnt appear to be your argument for 1977.

The only line I can see interpreted as taking your sarcasm at face value is this:

The mocking tone of both the first line and 'GG town. Yates just broke this game wide open.' make it sound like he thinks Yates is town, but then there's the weird vote thing?

and I think it's pretty obvious I'm assuming it's sarcasm.

PEdit: Town meta doesn't matter. People play differently as town all the time. The problem is that you're arguing my defense is invalid because of PMatt's meta, but the 'probably' in the second line reveals you don't know what it is.

What I do know is that PMatt is experienced enough that he wouldn't be scared to call people scum. And my townread isn't because of his lurking, it's because of what he says in the posts he does make.

Does anyone have meta on Matt?

Way basically I do not see this town able to move on to a lynch today on anything but the top wagons. When you NL early in the game, you prevent town from having info, and you basically give scum a free kill or in some cases 2 free kills

A NL should be used only in special circumstances primarily in a MYLO situation.

Theres 2 days left. Stop acting like deadline is in 20 minutes.

Less than 2 days and we need nine votes, I have seen NL days from too many wagons, especially large games.