Mafiascum.net

I could see Curros finally spelling my name right


But neither of those two things are true, eh Chruos?

In post 2550, eyestott wrote:Chruos?

Charles

I thought I would be the one to decide LyLo but I'm glad I can apparently pass the curse to Paragon in this gamestate.

I'm beginning to feel silly talking about eyesott, and right now I think Taly might be town because this is making more sense as [Eyesott, Alo] rather than [Taly, Eyesott].

I think it's up to Paragon to decide between [Churros, Eyesott] and [Taly, Alo] here.

If I may say something though, [Churros/Taly] is a pretty ridiculous team when you take a look at this game past days, really.

In post 2432, Paragon wrote:

In post 2425, Taly wrote:Maybe question PR claims after we lynch someone 4+ people agree is probable scum?

I'm not questioning them, I'm saying this lynch is fine because there's no way all 3 PR claims are fake given everyone else has claimed VT.

Something_Smart, do you believe this setup is balanced?

• 1 mafia rolecop
  
• 1 mafia goon
  
• 1 town 1-shot vig
  
• 1 town 2-shot BP
  
• 1 town novice 1-shot gunsmith
  
• 7 VT

Plus 1 town neapolitan. I'm not sure how he left that out. I'm also not sure how he assumes a mafia rolecop.

Anyway, one of these PRs has to be fake. That's just too much power for Town.

In post 2554, Aloratom wrote:

In post 2432, Paragon wrote:

In post 2425, Taly wrote:Maybe question PR claims after we lynch someone 4+ people agree is probable scum?

I'm not questioning them, I'm saying this lynch is fine because there's no way all 3 PR claims are fake given everyone else has claimed VT.

Something_Smart, do you believe this setup is balanced?

• 1 mafia rolecop
  
• 1 mafia goon
  
• 1 town 1-shot vig
  
• 1 town 2-shot BP
  
• 1 town novice 1-shot gunsmith
  
• 7 VT

Plus 1 town neapolitan. I'm not sure how he left that out. I'm also not sure how he assumes a mafia rolecop.

Anyway, one of these PRs has to be fake. That's just too much power for Town.

excuse you, do you think used his check N3 effectively?

instead of saying then make a declarative statement or assessment that provides insight about the claims.

In post 2553, Churros wrote:I thought I would be the one to decide LyLo but I'm glad I can apparently pass the curse to Paragon in this gamestate.

I'm beginning to feel silly talking about eyesott, and right now I think Taly might be town because this is making more sense as [Eyesott, Alo] rather than [Taly, Eyesott].

I think it's up to Paragon to decide between [Churros, Eyesott] and [Taly, Alo] here.

If I may say something though, [Churros/Taly] is a pretty ridiculous team when you take a look at this game past days, really.

lmfao is the most dysfunctional trio ever as all-town

i can believe it.

In post 2555, Taly wrote:

In post 2554, Aloratom wrote:

In post 2432, Paragon wrote:

In post 2425, Taly wrote:Maybe question PR claims after we lynch someone 4+ people agree is probable scum?

I'm not questioning them, I'm saying this lynch is fine because there's no way all 3 PR claims are fake given everyone else has claimed VT.

Something_Smart, do you believe this setup is balanced?

• 1 mafia rolecop
  
• 1 mafia goon
  
• 1 town 1-shot vig
  
• 1 town 2-shot BP
  
• 1 town novice 1-shot gunsmith
  
• 7 VT

Plus 1 town neapolitan. I'm not sure how he left that out. I'm also not sure how he assumes a mafia rolecop.

Anyway, one of these PRs has to be fake. That's just too much power for Town.

excuse you, do you think

eye

used his check N3 effectively?

instead of saying

"these PRs all are town but that's too much power"

then make a declarative statement or assessment that provides insight about the claims.

That's what I'm saying. I don't know why you use it on a VT claim. He would have been better suited to confirm Churros.

In my eyes it has to be the Bulletproof or the Neapolitan that doesn't exist.

I'm really coming around to [Eyestott/Churros], [Paragon/Eyestott], [Paragon/Churros].

[Taly/Eyestott] can't work because taking out both Town PRs doesn't make sense.

Alora, I’ve cleared Paragon. He cannot be scum
Unless you think he’s on a team with me

Alora, Neapolitan doesn’t work how you think it works


Scum Churros will return a result of not a vannjjla townie
PR Churros will return a result of not a vanilla townie
Why would I target him?

In post 2558, Aloratom wrote:In my eyes it has to be the Bulletproof or the Neapolitan that doesn't exist.

I'm really coming around to [Eyestott/Churros], [Paragon/Eyestott], [Paragon/Churros].

You say that either the BP or Nea that doesn't exist but you're putting me in two different scum teams and not mentioning Taly at all?

In post 2561, eyestott wrote:Alora, Neapolitan doesn’t work how you think it works


Scum Churros will return a result of not a vannjjla townie
PR Churros will return a result of not a vanilla townie
Why would I target him?

Ahh... I see. I had to go hunt it down in the wiki. That changes things somewhat.

The only correct choices to target would’ve been either paragon or yourself.
Do you think I should’ve targeted you?
If so, why not ask me to target you during D3?

In post 2561, eyestott wrote:Alora, Neapolitan doesn’t work how you think it works


Scum Churros will return a result of not a vannjjla townie
PR Churros will return a result of not a vanilla townie
Why would I target him?

I understand you now I think. Why did you pick Paragon and not Something_Smart or me?

Ok, I just realized I think it's very probably scum!Alo right now.

I think eyesott/Alo are trying to fake spew each other by confusing a role that was already explained in the past pages. Even from a 3rd pov, It doesn't matter who was scum between me/Taly, we would have explained or talked about it in scum PT given that we were just discussing the role now.

Alo literally would need to not have read the game or if scum to have a partner out of [Taly, Churros] for him to confuse it again like that.

It makes a lot of sense that eyesott would see me confuse it and would say to alo to confuse it as well, and they would interact as if the claim wasn't planned what would look like...fairly anti-spew...exactly what they would be gunning for?

Idk I'm not really feeling Taly as eyesott partner anymore

In post 2564, eyestott wrote:The only correct choices to target would’ve been either paragon or yourself.
Do you think I should’ve targeted you?
If so, why not ask me to target you during D3?

I actually thought you'd be the NK.

In post 2566, Churros wrote:Ok, I just realized I think it's very probably scum!Alo right now.

I think eyesott/Alo are trying to fake spew each other by confusing a role that was already explained in the past pages. Even from a 3rd pov, It doesn't matter who was scum between me/Taly, we would have explained or talked about it in scum PT given that we were just discussing the role now.

Alo literally would need to not have read the game or if scum to have a partner out of [Taly, Churros] for him to confuse it again like that.

It makes a lot of sense that eyesott would see me confuse it and would say to alo to confuse it as well, and they would interact as if the claim wasn't planned what would look like...fairly anti-spew...exactly what they would be gunning for?

Idk I'm not really feeling Taly as eyesott partner anymore

To be honest, I haven't caught up, which is my fault. I thought it was pretty important to get a foothold before something bad happened.

If you're right, eyestott, and I think you may be, then the Bulletproof doesn't really make sense.

In post 2564, eyestott wrote:The only correct choices to target would’ve been either paragon or yourself.
Do you think I should’ve targeted you?
If so, why not ask me to target you during D3?

You could have picked Something_Smart also, right?

In post 2570, Aloratom wrote:

In post 2564, eyestott wrote:The only correct choices to target would’ve been either paragon or yourself.
Do you think I should’ve targeted you?
If so, why not ask me to target you during D3?

You could have picked Something_Smart also, right?

I could’ve, but with him being the NK, that would’ve been the incorrect decision

Is churros actually defending Taly's slot now after pushing him earlier?

In post 2569, Aloratom wrote:If you're right, eyestott, and I think you may be, then the Bulletproof doesn't really make sense.

In post 2565, Aloratom wrote:

In post 2561, eyestott wrote:Alora, Neapolitan doesn’t work how you think it works


Scum Churros will return a result of not a vannjjla townie
PR Churros will return a result of not a vanilla townie
Why would I target him?

I understand you now I think. Why did you pick Paragon and not Something_Smart or me?

Paragon showed the initiative and asked me to check him, whereas it didn’t seem like you were putting as much effort into the game during day 3.
I felt having a sure read on Paragon would be a win either way, cause I would either get to force a lynch between he and I or have someone I can work together with effectively.

I see. That makes sense.