Mafiascum.net

In post 2547, Datisi wrote:

In post 2354, jjh927 wrote:That's a lot of posts and not a lot of things happening

i'm trying to use my brain for long enough to catch up on what i missed, and this is pretty close to my thoughts so far

i now remember why i don't play in large games

In post 2548, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Ircher
I don’t get how bad ratmans vote is meant to transition into voting Ircher but okay. And yeah if ratmans is sus of y’all’s read on me that should make me town? And what makes GLB’s vote good there? I don’t rlly see scum agenda in it but there’s so many questions that need to be answered there

In post 2551, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2548, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Ircher
I don’t get how bad ratmans vote is meant to transition into voting Ircher but okay. And yeah if ratmans is sus of y’all’s read on me that should make me town? And what makes GLB’s vote good there? I don’t rlly see scum agenda in it but there’s so many questions that need to be answered there

EBWOP

In post 2550, Cheeky Wings wrote:No brain cells required. Vote Ircher 2021.

In post 2555, Datisi wrote:

In post 2550, Cheeky Wings wrote:No brain cells required. Vote Ircher 2021.

please explain this in the simplest way possible pls

In post 2559, Datisi wrote:i need explanation on why i should do that, i'm digging my current vote

also i still feel like ydrasse needs a nice amount of votes but i'm not even gonna pretend to try to push that

In post 2560, Ydrasse wrote:Give me until tomorrow and then i will activate

In post 2178, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 2176, Loftwing wrote:So you're saying that we should kill players who we aren't sure either way are town or scum because of their low content output, rather than extremely scummy players who output a lot of content?

no

i just disagree with what cheeky said lol


im not saying we shouldnt ignore those scummy players but we also shouldnt ignore thsoe ppl i pointed out

In post 2527, ratmans wrote:

In post 2400, Deimos27 wrote:Here's the thing about the post restriction.
We've seen some posts from Victorine that don't appear post restricted at all.
We've seen some posts with apparent restrictions that immediately vanish and different ones appear thereafter.
Either there really exists some general post restriction that encompasses all the variety in posts we've seen from Victorine (press x to doubt) or RC is like actively changing Victorine's post restrictions (which would be an insane amount of work, so... press x to doubt)

But would scum faking a post restriction make it look so chaotic as to be unbelievable?

In post 2539, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2175, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 2100, Cheeky Wings wrote:

In post 2098, Gamma Emerald wrote:Even if it’s a joke it (as in, the post) still deserves death I think
Compare how he’s acting here to how he acted in this game, then try and tell me don’t understand why I’m being very critical of what Loft is doing.

Gamma I just think killing loft who is a claimed miller and low content slot, just doesn't help us much at this stage. If they keep it up in coming phases sure. Toog could've sorted them for us but c'est la vie.
~C

eh not rlly -- there is 17 ppl .


i rather get rid of the low content ppl and ppl who just troll around rather than get distracted with possible openwolf and warlocking

Hang on how do you know about warlocking

In post 2546, Cheeky Wings wrote:FTR ratmans scumreads are
"The hydra talk too much, one must be scum"
"I suss CWs read of gamma" and votes there when gamma happens to be the biggest wagon, after pushing grandpamo...
*3d chess helmet breaks*
Dammit.
~C

In post 2569, Gamma Emerald wrote:warlocking

In post 2572, Gamma Emerald wrote:That’s a term used like exclusively by 1 player who hasn’t been playing like anywhere for a while iirc